Los Angeles Times

Why won’t Nancy Pelosi stop emailing me?

- NICHOLAS GOLDBERG @Nick_Goldberg

thought that when the midterm elections were over, when Nov. 8 came and went, the barrage of political fundraisin­g emails would stop. Who was I kidding? They kept on coming because in the modern era of permanent campaigns, spam, digital fundraisin­g and general shamelessn­ess, that’s just the way it is. There’s no rest for the weary or the tapped out.

Not only did the emails not stop coming, they seemed to ratchet up from a previous level of frantic anxiety to a new plateau of panic and hysteria. Presumably, if they didn’t, you might shrug it off and fail to rush for your wallet and your Xanax.

“This is absolutely critical, Nick,” says one email I received from Nancy Pelosi. “I cannot overstate the severity of this situation.”

“Things have taken a dire turn,” says another.

The fundraisin­g pleas I get are mostly from the Democratic Congressio­nal Campaign Committee and from a handful of politician­s whose lists I’ve somehow fallen onto. They’re sent under the names of members of Congress such as Pelosi, Adam Schiff and Hakeem Jeffries, with cameos from Barack Obama, Joe Biden and others. If I choose to contribute, my money is routed through the digital donation platform ActBlue.

I’ve never signed up to be on their lists. I’ve never donated to the candidates in question. But they keep trying. “Nick, this is the single biggest announceme­nt we have ever made.”

“We’re asking — no we’re downright begging you — to step up.” “This is your last chance, Nick.” Yeah, right.

I’m supposed to be flattered, I guess, that these bigwigs are taking time to write to me personally, relying on the use of first names to sound chummy. “Adam suggested I get in touch with you,” wrote Stacey Abrams, when she was running for governor. “Nick, I’m disgusted,” wrote Pelosi. “I wanted to tell you personally.”

The calls to action are desperate: They’re “begging” for my help, they’re “pleading,” they’re “imploring.”

I’m supposed to be ashamed when they’re “disappoint­ed” in me. As in, “Nick we’ve reached out 19 times… Now is not the time to ignore our emails, Nick.”

Actually, it was that last one that put me over the edge. I mean, if the week between Christmas and New Year’s isn’t the time to ignore their emails, when is? Answer: Never, of course.

I don’t know who writes this hyperbolic crap. Not Nancy, Hakeem or Barack, that’s for sure. But I guess it does the trick.

During the 2022 election cycle,

more than 7.4 million unique donors gave 86 million contributi­ons to 27,000 Democratic campaigns and progressiv­e organizati­ons totaling $3.5 billion through the ActBlue platform, the company says. Since 2004, it has raised $11.7 billion.

And why should that bother me? I’m generally sympatheti­c to Democrats. I know they need money to win their races.

Probably I should be grateful that ActBlue (and its counterpar­t WinRed, which offers similar services for Republican­s) encourages small donations from ordinary voters to compete with the billionair­es, unions and corporatio­ns that increasing­ly fund our elections.

But I’m bothered neverthele­ss by the glib clickbait of the endless solicitati­ons. As former Rep. Steve Israel of New York noted: “Isn’t democracy in enough trouble without reducing it to a speed date?”

Political spam has become too cheap and easy to send out. Billions of political messages are dispatched by the candidates’ campaigns each year in email, text and robocalls. For us recipients, it’s none too easy to opt out. While commercial solicitati­ons by email and text are subject to certain basic rules — they must have clear opt-out mechanisms and must identify who is sending the message, for instance — political email is less tightly regulated.

“The politician­s who write the rules have exempted themselves from a lot of the rules that could apply,” Ellen Wintraub, the Federal Election Commission­er, told the Washington Post. That was in October when Google was launching a pilot program to allow campaign emails to bypass the spam filters that protect Gmail users from junk mail.

How do you get on the radar of politician­s who want your money? Their campaigns buy voter registrati­on lists and trade databases with other groups. You’re selected not because you’ve expressed interest in donating but based on your data, such as party registrati­on, income, age, debt level, history of donating, religion and whether you own a gun.

In 2021, four state attorneys general opened investigat­ions into political fundraiser­s’ use of prechecked boxes that signed people up automatica­lly to pay recurring donations when they had only intended to contribute once. ActBlue (and WinRed) was investigat­ed amid fraud allegation­s and refund demands; now it says it no longer uses prechecked boxes.

And, oh sure, you can click “Unsubscrib­e” if you can find the tiny link way down at the bottom. But actually getting off the list is another story. As ActBlue says: “In general, you can usually find an ‘Unsubscrib­e’ link at the end of most emails that should take you off of that specific email list.”

Have you ever read a sentence with more qualifiers?

Don’t hold your breath. Nothing is more important than money to candidates. A week before the election, Open Secrets, which tracks money in politics, projected that all state and federal 2022 campaign spending would reach $16.7 billion. According to fivethirty­eight.com, more than 90% of House candidates who outspend their opponents win.

It’s a bad, broken, corrupt system in which money plays far too big a role.

And I’m tired of being barraged day in and day out by patronizin­g, cheesy solicitati­ons. Nancy, Hakeem, Adam, Stacey, this is absolutely critical. I’m begging you to take me off your lists. I’m pleading. I’m imploring!

 ?? ??
 ?? J. Scott Applewhite Associated Press ?? ONE OF MY most frequent email correspond­ents.
J. Scott Applewhite Associated Press ONE OF MY most frequent email correspond­ents.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States