Why Murdaugh case resonated so widely
Focus on trial ending with lawyer in prison for life offers insights into human psyche.
WALTERBORO, S.C. — Leading up to Alex Murdaugh’s conviction Thursday on two counts of murder, public attention on the case had intensified.
Investigations stemming from the June 7, 2021, shooting deaths of Murdaugh’s wife and son Paul revealed that the prominent South Carolina lawyer had stolen millions of dollars from largely poor clients’ settlements and had staged an attempt on his life so his surviving son could get a $12million life insurance payout, according to authorities.
True-crime enthusiasts, concerned onlookers and others were fascinated by the years-long unraveling of the mystery that jurors weighed in the six-week trial.
Experts say the small town saga’s transformation into an international point of intrigue highlights insights into the human psyche: People are drawn to events that inform their perceptions of threat. And some legal observers have found an important opportunity for education.
Coltan Scrivner, a researcher at the Recreational Fear Lab at Aarhus University in Denmark, said the human desire to avoid being duped has developed into a natural curiosity about signs of danger. Those cues, he said, are especially strong when the schemes involve the rich and powerful, like the Murdaugh family.
“We put it in our Rolodex of possible simulations of what could happen in a bad situation,” Scrivner said.
Amanda Vicary, a psychology professor at Illinois Wesleyan University, said the popularity of true crime is largely driven by women interested in its self-protective lessons. Many followers of the case might subconsciously be asking themselves what they need to watch out for in their own lives, she said.
Plus, the many aspects of the Murdaugh case — mystery, forensics, family, finances — appeal to a variety of interests.
“Most popular true crime stories might only have one or two of those elements,” Vicary said, whereas the Murdaugh case “has a little something” for everyone.
Stephanie Truesdale, a South Carolina teacher whose crocheted dolls of prominent figures in the case went viral on social media, said the combination of a wealthy family’s fall from grace and the case’s many unexpected developments piqued her attention from the start. She said she was particularly interested to see how the state’s legal system would treat “one of their own.”
Although the dolls garnered praise, some other displays of public interest in the case have been less wellreceived. Several trespassers were found last weekend taking selfies outside the feed room where Paul Murdaugh died, according to defense lawyer Dick Harpootlian. He described it as the “most distasteful thing” he had ever seen.
“If people are really paying attention, they could really learn a lot from what’s going on right now, instead of just the more gruesome aspect of things,” Truesdale said.
Sarah Ford, legal director for the South Carolina Victim Assistance Network, said she’d found that people want to better understand legal processes in connection to the case. She and former state lawmaker Mandy Powers Norrell hosted Twitter spaces to answer questions about the proceedings, and recently drew 600 people for an hourlong YouTube Live conversation.
Ford said the trial spurred conversations that could change common misconceptions about crime, raising awareness of issues such as the prevalence of domestic violence, she said.
Ford recognized the importance of community engagement, but cautioned: “You don’t want this to be something that takes over someone’s life as entertainment. Because it’s not. These are real people. These are real crimes. These have true, chilling, tragic effects for real people.”
It’s not the first time a double murder trial in South Carolina has reverberated so widely. It was big news when Susan Smith was convicted of the 1994 drowning deaths of her two young children and sentenced to life in prison.
State Rep. Tommy Pope, who was the lead prosecutor in the Smith case, said he thinks people are drawn to the Murdaugh saga because of its “truth is stranger than fiction” aspects.
“It’s like a soap opera, but it’s really happening with real people,” said Pope, adding, “This is not entertainment. It is a tragedy, and lives were lost.”
Pope said the Murdaugh case offered an opportunity to educate the public about the justice system. An analyst on Court TV during the trial, Pope said media coverage probably helped viewers reach their own conclusions and understand the legal system’s “positives” as well as its “warts.”
Streaming services also took notice of the case. Discovery released a three-part series a year after Maggie and Paul Murdaugh were killed; HBO Max launched a three-part documentary on the case in November; and Netflix released “Murdaugh Murders: A Southern Scandal” for U.S. audiences last week. The latter’s creators told Vanity Fair they had unearthed additional crimes in the process of making it.
About 100 other charges, including financial crimes — for which lead prosecutor Creighton Waters drew admissions of guilt from Murdaugh last week — have yet to go to trial.
Many South Carolinians’ interest in the case comes from a strong desire to see justice served to a wellconnected man who only recently acknowledged lies and abuses of power that had long gone unchecked.
In addition to intense online and media attention, the trial drew daily crowds outside the courthouse since it began on Jan. 25.
Among several dozen who gathered there Thursday before the verdict was the Rev. Raymond Johnson, a civil rights activist who led others in a prayer and carried a sign reading, “Justice coming soon.”
A jury took under three hours to find Alex Murdaugh guilty on Thursday. He was sentenced Friday to spend the rest of his life in prison.