Los Angeles Times

State lowers reservoir levels to prevent overflow

- Times staff writers Jessica Garrison and Susanne Rust contribute­d to this report.

tential to be a dangerous situation, particular­ly in areas that had experience­d flooding before.”

Officials activated the State-Federal Flood Operation Center on Thursday morning, Nemeth said, which indicates an elevated level of coordinati­on and monitoring before the storm.

Yet another atmospheri­c river is expected to follow early next week, and there is a potential for a third around March 19, according to state climatolog­ist Mike Anderson.

“We were well on our way to a fourth year of drought” at the beginning of January, Anderson said. “We’re in a very different condition now.”

The incoming storm will fall atop soaked soils and some of the deepest snowpack California has recorded. Both can exacerbate the potential for runoff and erosion.

The conditions are in some ways akin to those that led to a near-catastroph­ic failure of the Oroville Dam in 2017, when heavy rains damaged an emergency spillway and threatened to send floodwater­s down to communitie­s below.

Officials on Thursday said there is no danger of a similar event now since the spillway has been reconstruc­ted with several feet of thick concrete. However, the second-largest reservoir in California is about 60 feet below its maximum elevation, said Ted Craddock, DWR’s deputy director of the State Water Project, and operators have begun releasing water to ensure room for incoming flows.

Increased releases from Oroville’s Hyatt Power Plant started Wednesday, Craddock said, with more to begin Friday from its gated spillway at a combined rate of 15,000 cubic feet per second from both facilities. It will mark the first use of the main spillway since April 2019.

“This is a relatively small release out of the spillway, and as we look further into the forecast, with the possibilit­y of additional storms, we will be adjusting releases from the lake,” Craddock said.

Officials from the DWR, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamatio­n and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are also ramping up releases at other locations before the storm, including Lake Shasta and Millerton Lake, said Levi Johnson, deputy operations manager of the Central Valley Project with the Bureau of Reclamatio­n.

Folsom Lake — which primarily acts as a f lood control system for the Sacramento area — still has “quite a bit of storage space,” Johnson said, but officials are anticipati­ng flows there will increase with the current storms. Releases went up to about 15,000 cubic feet per second Thursday, and will increase to 30,000 on Friday.

“These releases are in anticipati­on of the inflows due to these storms,” Johnson said. “We will be prepared to increase further if needed and as we see how the inflows from these storms shape up.”

Despite assurances, some people in the Central Valley said they’re concerned about the risks of devastatin­g floods in the coming days.

“I am fearing levee failures and flooded homes,” said John Ennis, a civil engineer who owns a consulting firm in Fresno.

Ennis said he’s worried that “there’s just going to be too much water on top of the snowpack, and it all dissolves at once” — a scenario that could send floodwater­s roaring down from Sierra Nevada into the Central Valley.

Anne Lynch, integrated water management lead with the consulting firm GHD, said it’s good news that the state’s reservoirs are being actively managed for flood control, especially in areas that saw flooding previously.

“They’re managing for our water supply, which has also got to be front-of-mind, but they’re also managing for the ability to not have reservoirs overtoppin­g,” she said. “It’s a complicate­d thing.”

Some areas that flooded during the previous storms, such as Wilton, are “natural flow areas” that almost always flood during heavy rains and are likely to flood again, Lynch noted. Although some incidents are inevitable, she said, such events are also reason to invest in infrastruc­ture.

“There’s the things that are outside of our control, and then the things that haven’t been built,” she said.

In high-elevation areas, the biggest threat from the storm will probably be structural damage as rain makes the snowpack even heavier, UCLA climate scientist Daniel Swain said during a briefing. The state has seen a spate of roof collapses from heavy snow, including a grocery store providing crucial supplies in Crestline.

“The bigger concern with flooding is actually at lower to medium elevations,” Swain said. That includes areas at about 5,000 feet and below in Central California and the southern Sierra.

“There really will be significan­t melting of the snowpack — which is substantia­l at those elevations — as heavy rain falls into it,” he said. “But really, the main flood threat is coming from the fact that the storm is just going to bring a significan­t amount of rainfall in its own right.”

According to the National Weather Service, some of the highest flood risk will be in coastal areas from Salinas to San Luis Obispo, and throughout the Central Valley.

Officials in Fresno, Madera, Modesto and Santa Cruz counties have issued evacuation warnings for some communitie­s due to likely flooding. San Luis Obispo County, which saw significan­t flooding during the January storms, has the “potential for similar impacts” from the incoming system, the weather service said.

Crews are “battening down the hatches and getting ready for the storm series,” said Mark Bingham, fire protection district chief in the Santa Cruz mountain town of Boulder Creek. “We’re hopefully ready for what Mother Nature throws at us.”

In the Merced County town of Planada, officials went door to door to many homes Wednesday and Thursday to warn of possible disaster. The town was almost entirely flooded after a levee broke in January.

“People are full of fear,” County Supervisor Rodrigo Espinosa said from his car as he returned from watching crews lay sandbags at nearby Bear Creek. He hoped that the sandbags, debris clearance and other infrastruc­ture improvemen­ts would prevent a worst-case scenario.

Swain said that some effects of the storm may not be felt right away, but that the state’s heavy snowpack “is all going to have to come downhill eventually.”

“Even though the flood peaks don’t look extremely high on any individual river system with this event, what’s going to start to happen is we’re going to see now elevated flows on a lot of major rivers for a very prolonged period of time — so not just for hours or even days, but very possibly more like days to weeks or longer,” he said.

Adding to the challenge are unpredicta­ble patterns driven by climate change, as well as the difficulti­es of securing funding for flood control projects in an often bone-dry state, said Lynch, of consulting firm GHD. Warm rain-on-snow events and other extreme weather can upend the natural timing of snowmelt that state water managers have long relied on.

“The amount of snow we got this year was awesome, but it has its own challenges for the system, because we designed it and built it for one kind of reality, and we’ve got a changing reality that we’ve got to move to address,” she said.

Ennis, the Fresno resident, works with developers and farmers and said he’s concerned about potentiall­y dangerous circumstan­ces, including sudden levee breaks that could put people at risk.

“There’s only one thing that keeps me up awake at night as a civil engineer, and it’s water. It’s this kind of situation,” he said. “You’re potentiall­y talking about insane volumes of water.”

 ?? Los Angeles Times Vanessa Martínez ??
Los Angeles Times Vanessa Martínez

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States