Warm tides are eating vast holes into a major Greenland glacier
Oceans fueled by climate change are a ‘powerful mechanism’ for accelerating ice melt, study finds.
Daily tides stoked with increasingly warm water have eaten a hole taller than the Washington Monument at the bottom of one of Greenland’s major glaciers in the last couple of years, accelerating the retreat of a crucial portion, a study found.
Scientists worry that the phenomenon isn’t limited to this one glacier, raising questions about previous projections of melting rates on the world’s vulnerable ice sheets.
The rapid melt seen in this study took place in the far northwest of Greenland, on Petermann Glacier. If it is happening in the rest of Greenland and the larger Antarctic ice sheet, then global ice loss and the sea level rise could jump as much as twice as quickly as previously thought, according to the study in Monday’s Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
“It’s bad news,” said study author Eric Rignot, a glaciologist at UC Irvine.
“We know the current projections are too conservative. We know that they have a really hard time matching the current [melt] record.”
He said the newly found consequence of tidal activity “could potentially double the projections” of global melt.
The study looks at the grounding line area of glaciers on ice sheets — that’s the point where glaciers go from being on land to floating on water. Previous studies show it’s a key spot for rapid ice loss.
At remote Petermann, which has no base camps and has seen few visitors, that grounding line zone is more than six-tenths of a mile wide and could be as much as 3.7 miles wide, the study said.
Scientists used to think the daily tides weren’t a big deal on melt. The snow added atop the glacier compensated for the tides moving farther in, said Rignot, the day before he left for an expedition to Petermann. But with an ocean that’s warmer because of climate change, the tides became “a very powerful mechanism,” Rignot said.
“The sea water actually goes much farther beneath the grounded ice [than previously thought] — kilometers, not hundreds of meters,” Rignot said. “And that water is full of heat and able to melt the glaciers vigorously. And it’s kind of the most sensitive part of the glacier.”
Using satellite altitude measurements, Rignot’s team found a 669-foot tall cavity at the grounding line where the melt rate was 50% higher in the last three years than it was in 2016-19. Previous models forecast zero melt there.
The melting in Petermann has accelerated in the last few years, later than the rest of Greenland. This is probably because the glacier is so far north that the water melting it from underneath is from the North Atlantic and takes longer to reach there, Rignot theorized.
Rignot this month is exploring Petermann to get more ground-based measurements using ultrasound. He hasn’t been there since 2006, a decade before the changes were seen via satellite. Visiting Petermann, even before the glacier’s retreat accelerated, Rignot noticed movements that make it seem like a living thing, he said.
“When you are standing on that shelf or sleeping on the shelf, you hear noise all the time, loud noises from deep inside cracks forming,” Rignot said. “That’s where the concept of a glacier being alive starts getting to you.”
Greenland ice researcher Jason Box of the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, who wasn’t part of the research, called Rignot’s technique clever and said the study makes sense, showing “that ocean heat delivery to tidewater glacier grounding lines represents a potent destabilizing effect.”
Box, who uses a different technique to calculate how much ice is no longer being fed by glaciers and is doomed to melt, something called “zombie ice,” figures that 434 billion metric tons of ice on Petermann are already committed to melting.
The study provides strong evidence that models need to include these tidal effects deep inland, and if they don’t, they are underestimating future sea level rise, said Pennsylvania State University glaciologist Richard Alley, who was not part of the Rignot study.
‘It’s bad news. ... That water is full of heat and able to melt the glaciers vigorously. And it’s kind of the most sensitive part of the glacier.’
— Eric Rignot, glaciologist at UC Irvine