Los Angeles Times

Biden faces tough decisions in debt ceiling crisis

To win in 2024, the president has to convince voters that he can effectivel­y steer the economy.

- By David Lauter

WASHINGTON — President Biden has grounded his reelection hopes in large part on not being Donald Trump, and the former president’s resentment-filled performanc­e at a CNN town hall Wednesday night illustrate­d why that argument might suffice.

During the broadcast, Trump defended taking children away from their families at the border, wouldn’t rule out a federal abortion ban, said he would pardon “a large portion” of the people convicted of attacking the Capitol in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot and advocated for the U.S. to default on its debt for the first time in history.

“It’s simple, folks. Do you want four more years of that?” Biden’s campaign account tweeted after the show.

But despite the vast unpopulari­ty of those Trump positions with voters outside of his hardcore base, Biden is the incumbent this time. To win in 2024, he probably has to do more than simply be the anti-Trump.

At minimum, the president has to convince voters that he’s capable of effectivel­y steering the U.S. economy — a subject on which a majority currently rates him poorly.

That means avoiding a default on federal obligation­s this summer, an event that economists warn could cause economic chaos and a topic on which Biden and congressio­nal Republican­s are stalemated.

For months, as the federal government has crept ever closer to exhausting its credit limit, the White House position has been that Biden would not negotiate with Republican­s over raising the amount Washington legally can borrow.

Congress has a nonnegotia­ble obligation to authorize enough borrowing to cover the spending it has already written into law, Biden and his aides have argued.

The government will hit its current $31-trillion limit soon, perhaps as early as June, Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen has warned. Without an increase, the Treasury would be unable to meet all federal obligation­s, jeopardizi­ng Social Security checks, interest on government bonds and salaries for soldiers, among other things. Such a default would be unthinkabl­e, Democrats have said.

Republican­s, from House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Bakersfiel­d) on down, have made the opposite argument: Congress needs to keep raising the debt limit because the government spends too much, they say. So an increase in the limit should be tied to negotiatio­ns to reduce spending.

Biden’s refusal to negotiate made political sense so long as McCarthy was unable to get his fractious caucus to agree on a budget package. If the House couldn’t pass anything, the speaker would have to give up or accept blame for a potentiall­y catastroph­ic default, White House aides knew.

But in late April, McCarthy succeeded by the slimmest of margins. The bill that passed, 217 to 215, wasn’t legislatio­n anyone liked much — even on his side — but it was the necessary ticket to the negotiatin­g room.

“We’ve done our job,” McCarthy said after the vote.

“The White House made a big bet — not an unreasonab­le one — that Republican­s would not be able to get their act together,” said Liam Donovan, a D.C. lobbyist with long experience in Republican politics.

Once McCarthy succeeded, however, “not negotiatin­g wasn’t going to be tenable.”

So last week, without admitting he was doing so, Biden shifted course: He began talking.

Now, he’s got decisions to make.

How far to go in the talks is a delicate choice. Any deal with McCarthy will involve spending cuts that will anger Democratic constituen­cies. Even the idea of negotiatio­ns sits badly with many Democrats, who accepted the earlier White House argument that the debt ceiling shouldn’t be a negotiatin­g topic.

In 2011, President Obama’s talks with House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) over the debt ceiling and spending generated a backlash among Democrats that fora time threatened Obama’s reelection. Biden’s role in negotiatin­g a final deal that year with Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky has long been a reason for progressiv­e activists to mistrust him.

Another downside of talks: If Biden were to cut a deal with McCarthy that the speaker then couldn’t sell to House Republican­s — the fate Boehner suffered — the White House would have angered Democrats and gained nothing.

Yet failure to reach a deal could trigger a default — a risk Biden doesn’t want to take. Economic chaos, whoever is to blame, would seriously damage the president’s chances for reelection.

In a brief news conference Tuesday, after an initial meeting with congressio­nal leaders, Biden said he would do “everything in my power” to avoid a default.

Trump, knowing a recession could be to his political advantage, made a deal harder to reach with his remarks during the CNN show.

“I say to the Republican­s out there — congressme­n, senators — if they don’t give you massive cuts, you’re going to have to do a default,” he declared.

A default might lead to “a bad week or a bad day,” he said, minimizing the consequenc­es. But “you might as well do it now because you’ll do it later,” he added, falsely implying that the U.S. is on a path to inevitably being unable to meet its obligation­s because of the mounting debt.

Trump’s words won’t make reaching a deal any easier. But a possible outline of one has started to become clear.

An increase in the debt ceiling and limits on spending would be legislated separately. That way, Republican­s could say the two were linked, while Democrats could deny that.

The spending cuts would include rescinding some unspent COVID-19 relief funds — something Biden said Wednesday he could accept.

Beyond that, the two sides probably would agree to cap the annual appropriat­ions that Congress makes for federal programs. Since appropriat­ions have to pass both houses, Democrats know they would have to compromise with Republican­s even if the debt ceiling weren’t an issue.

None of that would be easy. The two sides have big disagreeme­nts.

The path might be smoothed by agreement on something both sides want — albeit for different reasons.

One possibilit­y would be a deal to change federal permitting rules to ease the building of new energy-related projects.

Meeting Biden’s goals for renewable energy will require a big expansion of electric transmissi­on lines, White House officials say. Republican­s want to speed approval of new pipelines and other projects.

It’s probably no coincidenc­e that John Podesta, the veteran Democratic operative whom Biden chose last year to guide new cleanenerg­y investment­s, unveiled the administra­tion’s position on reforming the permit process the day after Biden and the congressio­nal leadership met. Podesta’s plan got tentative approval from environmen­tal groups that have opposed previous efforts to change the rules.

The alternativ­e for Biden would be to forego negotiatio­ns and try to go it alone, perhaps by pursuing the legal argument that the debt ceiling violates the 14th Amendment’s command that “the validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law ... shall not be questioned.”

But that doesn’t appear to be where he’s heading. On Wednesday, Biden traveled to a swing district in New York to press his case that Republican­s are “literally ... holding the economy hostage.”

But in remarks to reporters later that day, he appeared to be readying his argument for easing Democrats into accepting a difficult compromise.

“Look, the idea that we’re going to just not discuss anything consequent­ial is just not real,” he said.

 ?? Carolyn Kaster Associated Press ?? HOW FAR President Biden will go in talks with congressio­nal leaders is a delicate choice. Above, at Andrews Air Force Base on Saturday.
Carolyn Kaster Associated Press HOW FAR President Biden will go in talks with congressio­nal leaders is a delicate choice. Above, at Andrews Air Force Base on Saturday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States