Los Angeles Times

Reporter fights order to turn over her notes

Bakersfiel­d writer is found in contempt of court for withholdin­g a jailhouse interview. She’s appealing.

- By Grace Toohey

A reporter at the Bakersf ield California­n found in contempt of court Wednesday for refusing to turn over her unpublishe­d notes from a jailhouse interview has appealed the decision — saying she worries the ruling could undermine her journalist­ic integrity.

“We’re f ighting this because it’s so important for people to know we are not an arm of any government agency,” Ishani Desai, a 24year- old journalist covering Kern County courts and public safety for the California­n, said in an interview with The Times. “We want to protect our independen­ce.”

Earlier this month, Kern County Superior Court Judge Elizabet Rodriguez ruled that Desai must provide her notes from an interview with one of the co- defendants in a murder case to the other co- defendant. According to the California­n’s reporting on the decision, Rodriguez determined that “there is a possibilit­y” Desai’s unpublishe­d notes could help the other man’s defense.

But Desai and the newspaper’s attorney, Thomas R. Burke with the f irm Davis Wright Tremaine, said the possibilit­y of useful informatio­n in her notes does not meet the standard required by the state’s shield law for a journalist to turn over documentat­ion to a criminal defendant.

“You need to show a probabilit­y that [ the notes are] going to be beneficial to the defense,” Burke said. “All we heard was speculatio­n. ... You’ve got to have something … or you’re going to invade the privilege [ of journalist­s].”

Davis Wright Tremaine also provides regular legal counsel for The Times.

California’s shield law protects reporters from having to fulfill any subpoenas related to civil cases or from

prosecutor­s in criminal cases. However, if a subpoena comes from a criminal defendant — like in this case — case law has found that protection must be balanced with a defendant’s right to a fair trial, and certain requiremen­ts must be met to issue such subpoenas.

“It just can’t be enough that the defense is just f ishing for potential” informatio­n, said David Loy, legal director for the First Amendment Coalition. “That’s not how the shield law factors work.”

Desai has been reporting for months on the 2022 killing of a state prison counselor, in which two men — Sebastian Parra, 23, and Robert Roberts, 29 — have been charged.

Desai published an article in February based on a jailhouse interview with Parra. Afterward, Roberts’ attorney, Deputy Public Defender Alexandria Blythe, sought a subpoena seeking notes of the conversati­on.

Blythe did not return requests for comment Wednesday.

“Everything of consequenc­e is in the story, everything you might need to know is in the story,” Desai said.

Anything published is not protected by the state’s shield law, Burke said, noting that, “The article is there to be had.”

Burke said he requested late Wednesday that the 5th District Court of Appeal grant an immediate stay on the lower court’s ruling and grant their motion to quash the subpoena.

Burke said he expects a decision from the appeals court to come quickly, as the murder trial is scheduled for early June.

“You want reporters doing what they’re supposed to be doing, which is covering trials, not being a part of them,” Burke said.

Loy pointed out that protecting reporters from revealing their unpublishe­d notes or transcript­s is important not just for how the public perceives journalist­s, but also as a practical matter.

“If I’m a reporter and I’m going to talk to people and interview them … they may be more reluctant to talk to me if they know my notes from this conversati­on can be subpoenaed in court,” Loy said.

Desai said she respects why the trial court ruled the way it did — and understand­s the gravity of the case in question — but said she’s concerned about the implicatio­ns.

“We’re just trying to do our jobs, we’re just trying to inform the public,” Desai said. “We’re not interested in going to jail, we’re not interested in being f ined, even just being held in contempt … but we feel like we have to do this in order to stand up for what’s right and what’s important for the future of news in this community.”

‘ We’re just trying to do our jobs, we’re just trying to inform the public. ... We feel like we have to do this in order to stand up for what’s right.’ — I shani Desai,

Bakersfiel­d California­n reporter

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States