U.S. set to rejoin U.N. cultural organization
Move aims to counter China’s influence and ends a decade-long fallout over inclusion of Palestinians.
PARIS — The United Nations’ cultural and scientific agency, UNESCO, announced Monday that the U.S. plans to rejoin — and will pay more than $600 million in back dues — after a decade-long dispute that stemmed from the organization’s move to include the Palestinian territories as a member.
U.S. officials say the decision was motivated by concern that China is filling the gap left by the U.S. in UNESCO policymaking, notably in setting standards for artificial intelligence and technology education around the world.
The move will face a vote by UNESCO’s member states in the coming weeks. But approval seems a formality after the resounding applause that greeted the announcement in UNESCO’s Paris headquarters Monday. Not a single country raised an objection to the return of a nation that was once the agency’s single biggest funder.
The U.S. and Israel stopped funding UNESCO after it voted to include the Palestinian territories as a member state in 2011, and the Trump administration decided in 2017 to withdraw from the agency altogether the next year, citing longrunning anti-Israel bias and management problems.
UNESCO’s director general, Audrey Azoulay, has worked to address those concerns since her election in 2017, and that appears to have paid off.
“It’s a historic moment for UNESCO,” she said Monday. “It’s also an important day for multilateralism.”
U.S. Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Richard Verma submitted a letter last week to Azoulay formalizing the plan to rejoin. Verma noted progress in de-politicizing debate about the Middle East at UNESCO and reforming the agency’s management, according to the hand-delivered letter, which was obtained by the Associated Press.
The decision is a big financial boost to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, known for its World Heritage program as well as projects to fight climate change and teach girls to read.
Although Palestinian membership in UNESCO was the trigger for the U.S. fallout with the agency, its return is more about China’s growing influence.
Undersecretary of State for Management John Bass said in March that the U.S. absence from UNESCO has strengthened China and “undercuts our ability to be as effective in promoting our vision of a free world.”
He said UNESCO was key in setting and shaping standards for technology and science teaching around the world, “so if we’re really serious about the digital-age competition with China ... we can’t afford to be absent any longer.”
The U.S. decision doesn’t address the status of the Palestinians. Despite membership in UNESCO, the Palestinians are further away from statehood than ever. There have not been serious peace talks in more than a decade, and Israel’s new government is filled with hard-liners who oppose Palestinian independence.
The Palestinian ambassador didn’t comment on the U.S. decision. The only envoy who wasn’t gushing with praise was China’s ambassador, Jin Yang. He noted the negative effects of the U.S. absence, and expressed hope that the move means Washington is serious about multilateralism.
“Being a member of an international organization is a serious issue, and we hope that the return of the U.S. this time means it acknowledges the mission and the goals of the organization,” the ambassador said.
Since her election in 2017, Azoulay has worked to address the reasons the U.S. left, through budget reforms and building consensus among Jordanian, Palestinian and Israeli diplomats on sensitive UNESCO resolutions. Azoulay — who is Jewish — won praise from UNESCO ambassadors for her personal efforts to address U.S. concerns over Israel in particular.
The U.S. decision to come back “is the result of five years of work, during which we calmed tensions, notably on the Middle East, improved our response to contemporary challenges, resumed major initiatives on the ground and modernized the functioning of the organization,” Azoulay said.
She met with Democrats and Republicans in Washington to explain those efforts, according to a UNESCO diplomat. Thanks to those bipartisan negotiations, UNESCO diplomats expressed confidence that the U.S. decision to return is for the long term, regardless of who wins next year’s presidential election.
The diplomats were not authorized to be publicly named in discussing the behind-the-scenes work that led to the U.S. decision.
Under the plan, the U.S. government would pay its 2023 dues, plus $10 million in bonus contributions this year earmarked for Holocaust education, cultural heritage preservation in Ukraine, journalist safety, and science and technology education in Africa, Verma’s letter says.
The Biden administration has already requested $150 million for the 2024 budget to go toward UNESCO dues and arrears. The plan foresees similar requests for the ensuing years until the full debt of $619 million is paid off.
That accounts for a big chunk of UNESCO’s $534-million annual operating budget. Before leaving, the U.S. contributed 22% of the overall funding.
One diplomat expressed hope that the return of the U.S. would bring “more ambition and more serenity” — and energize programs to regulate artificial intelligence, educate girls in Afghanistan and chronicle victims of slavery in the Caribbean.
The diplomat said that the agency would also “welcome” Israel back if it wanted to rejoin. There was no immediate response from the Israeli government.
Israel has long accused the United Nations of antiIsrael bias. In 2012, over Israeli objections, the Palestinian territories were recognized as a nonmember observer state by the U.N. General Assembly. The Palestinians claim the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza Strip — territories captured by Israel in the 1967 Middle East War — for an independent state. Israel says the Palestinians’ efforts to win recognition at the U.N. are aimed at pressuring Israel into making concessions.
The U.S. previously pulled out of UNESCO under the Reagan administration in 1984 because it viewed the agency as mismanaged, corrupt and used to advance Soviet interests. It rejoined in 2003.