Los Angeles Times

Joshua trees helped under new law

-

are required to mitigate losses due to constructi­on by paying fees of up to $1,000 for each Joshua tree 16 feet or higher taken, and $2,500 for any taken within two miles of Joshua Tree National Park.

For all other projects, such as massive renewable energy facilities, there is no limit on take, although developers are required to demonstrat­e they have minimized the number that would be killed and pay fees for all of them removed.

Nearly half of the Joshua tree’s range is on private land that includes the rapidly growing communitie­s of Palmdale, Lancaster, Hesperia, Victorvill­e and Yucca Valley, where home builders already are planning to pass the additional costs on to their clients.

The new protection was authored by the Newsom administra­tion and based on input from stakeholde­rs including conservati­onists, lawmakers, tribal leaders, property owners, renewable-energy companies, labor organizati­ons and the constructi­on industry, officials said.

It was prompted by the California Fish and Game Commission’s inability to act on a petition filed nearly four years ago by the Center for Biological Diversity seeking to list the living symbols of the Mojave Desert as threatened under the California Endangered Species Act.

The commission a year ago deadlocked on whether to make the protection permanent.

“This bill ends the debate over whether Joshua trees should be protected,” said Brendan Cummings, the Center for Biological Diversity’s conservati­on director and a resident of the community of Joshua tree, “and launches us down an unpreceden­ted path on collective­ly working to save this iconic and irreplacea­ble species in the face of climate change.

“If we do what’s necessary to save the Joshua tree,” added Cummings, author of the petition, “we will also make Southern California’s high desert and the communitie­s within it a better, more sustainabl­e place for all of us.”

The commission’s stalemate reflected a politicall­y charged reality: The western Joshua tree requires a new era of regulation and conservati­on in an increasing­ly unforgivin­g ecosystem.

Opponents of the petition warned that listing the

species could discourage the building of much-needed homes, stifle economic investment, hamper job creation and increase developmen­t costs in a region regarded as a last vestige of affordable housing in Southern California.

“This is not a good law, and the Joshua tree is not an endangered species,” said Madelaine LaVoie, a real estate agent in the high desert city of Yucca Valley. “All it is going to do is add building costs that will be passed down to customers.”

The renewable-energy industry, while under fire for gobbling up desert land, maintains that by helping to eliminate greenhouse gas emissions, it is helping to mitigate climate change and the threat it poses to sensitive desert species such as the western Joshua tree.

“The administra­tion has done a fine job here,” said Shannon Eddy, executive director of the Large-scale Solar Assn.

“We’re living in a time when we have to think harder about how we structure our renewable energy goals and conservati­on protection­s,” she added. “The governor’s approach gets us to that nexus between climate action and conservati­on.”

At stake are living symbols of the Mojave Desert, many of them dying off due to hotter, drier conditions,

with fewer young Joshua trees becoming establishe­d. Conservati­onists fear that without special state protection­s, the species could lose 90% of its range, including within Joshua Tree National Park, by 2100.

Opponents including the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisor­s, however, preferred to leave the plant’s fate up to local jurisdicti­ons, where many residents and policymake­rs believe the species scientists know as Yucca brevifolia is already protected in many city and county native plant ordinances, and within 800,000-acre Joshua Tree National Park.

They also point out that state wildlife biologists a year ago recommende­d against listing the species after concluding that claims in the petition about the effects of climate change on the large yuccas were premature.

They questioned the reliabilit­y of computer models suggesting the species is in decline throughout its range. That’s because, they said, while there has been a decline in the western Joshua tree population in certain portions of its historic range, in other areas the species is abundant.

Earlier this month, Assemblyma­n Tom Lackey (RTwentynin­e Palms) urged lawmakers on the floor to vote against the bill he described

as “wholly unnecessar­y given data illustrate­s that this species is not at risk for the next hundred years.”

Critics fear that the law imposes costs that eventually will make clusters of high desert communitie­s in areas such as Morongo Valley affordable only to the most well-to-do transplant­s from urban areas.

Whether that will impede growth, however, remains to be seen. “This region is exploding with urbanites wanting to get out of the rat race,” said Chris Ligman, a building contractor in the city of Yucca Valley, about 120 miles northeast of Los Angeles. “Home builders are loving it.”

Joshua trees, which grow in the Mojave Desert and nowhere else, have become mainstays for movies, fashion shoots, advertisin­g campaigns and wedding ceremonies.

They were named for the biblical figure Joshua by members of a band of Mormons traveling through the Cajon Pass back to Utah in 1857, who imagined them as shaggy prophets, their outstretch­ed limbs pointing the way to their promised land.

The western Joshua tree is one of two geneticall­y distinct species that occur in California.

It has a boomerangs­haped range that extends westward from Joshua Tree

National Park to the northern slopes of the San Bernardino and San Gabriel mountains, then northward along the eastern flanks of the Sierra Nevada and then eastward to the edges of Death Valley National Park.

The eastern Joshua tree’s range in California is centered in the Mojave National Preserve and eastward into Nevada. As many as 1 million eastern Joshua trees were incinerate­d by the 2020 Dome fire in the preserve.

The fate of the western species, which reaches about 40 feet in height and lives about 200 years, is most in doubt.

The plant’s blossoms, roots, inner chambers and angular boughs sustain a great abundance and diversity of desert life: yucca moths, bobcats, desert night lizards, kangaroo rats and 20 species of birds, including Scott’s orioles, ladder-backed woodpecker­s and great horned owls.

But drought, extreme heat, brush fires and developmen­t sprawl are taking a heavy toll on the Joshua trees and the species they support. Some stands have not produced new plants in decades.

“While the western Joshua tree is the first species protected in California due to climate change,” Cummings said, “unfortunat­ely, it may not be the last one.”

 ?? Robert Gauthier Los Angeles Times ?? CHIP AND BARBARA Gross stop for photos at a grove of Joshua trees in the national park. Under the new law, developers of some projects will pay $2,500 for plants 16 feet or higher taken within two miles of the park.
Robert Gauthier Los Angeles Times CHIP AND BARBARA Gross stop for photos at a grove of Joshua trees in the national park. Under the new law, developers of some projects will pay $2,500 for plants 16 feet or higher taken within two miles of the park.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States