Los Angeles Times

Children with fever must stay home

-

surprise of some parents, but we have always been informed as a school system by the expert voices of medical entities,” Carvalho said Friday. “Times have changed. Conditions have changed and the recommenda­tions of protocols have shifted as well.”

He painted something of a back-to-normal pre-pandemic outlook, when it would make sense to keep a child with a fever at home.

“We’re back at a point — based on high levels of vaccinatio­n, therapeuti­cs available and children’s higher resiliency than most — where if a child is mildly sick — no fever, just maybe the sniff les — it is OK for them to go to school,” he said. “There are ways of mitigating against that: some good meds, a mask and monitoring.”

Carvalho said the tradeoff of erring too much on the side of caution is great.

“The physical threat of COVID has been by far replaced with the mental consequenc­es as attached to the lack of consistent attendance in school,” he said. “We cannot continue in an environmen­t where 40% of our kids are chronicall­y absent.”

He listed the mentalheal­th harms of being out of school that have been cited by authoritie­s, including U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy: “Anxiety, depression, social-emotional stressors, suicidal ideation.”

The superinten­dent also noted a financial impact. If the current 90% daily attendance rate rose to 95% — which it was pre-pandemic — the result, he said, would be $300 million more in state funding, which is largely based on attendance.

Carvalho spoke on a day when he took part in two home visits in North Hollywood with students who had poor attendance last year, including an eighth-grader who missed 40 days of school.

Her mother, Marissa Garcia, said both of her daughters had trouble keeping up with studies during the pandemic and also adjusting once school resumed. But the single mother said she and her daughters would redouble efforts to get the most out of school.

Carvalho’s message had support from a local pediatrici­an who is a spokespers­on for the American Academy of Pediatrics.

“Kids will get many mild illnesses throughout the school year and — just as I always said prior to the pandemic — if we kept kids home every time they had the sniffles, they’d miss too much school,” said Dr. Tanya Altmann, a Calabasas pediatrici­an. “Of course the pandemic changed things the past two years, but now that the serious threat of severe illness with COVID has passed, we need to get back to keeping kids in school and not being afraid of every cough and sneeze.”

Veteran L.A. school nurse Stephanie Yellin-Mednick supported Carvalho’s overall message but added that it remained important for families to test for COVID when students have symptoms — and to keep students home for five days if they test positive.

A teachers union spokespers­on said Carvalho should have put more emphasis on wearing a mask when sick.

People “could have sniffles because they have COVID — or because they have a cold, beginnings of the flu, etc.,” said Vice President Julie Van Winkle. “Either way, we think it’s important for the leader of our district to encourage everyone who isn’t feeling 100% to wear a mask to limit the spread of any illness they may be carrying.”

She added: “Of course, we want students to attend school whenever possible, but we also want to make sure that all our students and employees — including those who are immune-compromise­d — are safe at school. COVID didn’t go away — nor did other illnesses — and there are still folks reeling from long-term health impacts.”

The immediate reaction from parents and employees was varied.

If her third-grader has a cold but feels fine, “she will go to school,” said Basia Richard. “If she has a fever, she stays home until feverfree for 24 hours .... If she has a cold but doesn’t feel strong, she stays home. I would end all COVID measures!”

“The dividing line he proposes makes sense,” said Pam Schmidt, who is raising grandkids and is wary of children exaggerati­ng mild symptoms so they can stay home.

“Children who are sick should be kept home, especially the littles,” said Crystal Rios, a parent and district instructio­nal aide. “It breaks my heart when they can’t even talk, participat­e, or play without having a cough attack or boogies constantly running down their noses.”

“I will keep my son at home if he is under the weather … period!” said Kim Serrano.

“If there has to be a dividing-line metric, I think having a fever is a good one,” said Davida Ross, parent of a 10th-grader. “I would also include vomiting and discolored mucus but recognize those may be harder to quantify than a fever. Now that being said, there are plenty of parents who pump their kids up with fever-reducing medication and send them in.”

A longtime substitute teacher said she thinks that “kids should test and should not come if sick with COVID or sick coughing, sneezing, temperatur­e or not.” She recounted how she contracted COVID while filling in for a teacher who had left the day earlier with the illness.

“Many parents make decisions to the extremes,” said Elizabeth Gay Lannon, who is helping raise two grandchild­ren. “Some keep every sneeze home. Some send them to school after they threw up and have a 101 temp. Our elementary school has not had a nurse more than one to two days per week, so office staff and teachers have to decide.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States