Los Angeles Times

A liar or just a math nerd? Trial of FTX founder opens

Prosecutor­s and defense attorneys in the fraud case present conflictin­g portraits of Sam Bankman-Fried.

- By Bob Van Voris, Yueqi Yang and Ava Benny-Morrison Voris, Yang and Benny-Morrison write for Bloomberg.

Sam Bankman-Fried “lied to the world” as he built his cryptocurr­ency empire at FTX, telling only his friends and girlfriend the truth about what was happening, prosecutor­s said on the first day of a historic fraud trial.

Nathan Rehn, an assistant U.S. attorney, painted a picture of the 31-year-old as a calculated criminal who used investor deposits at FTX as a personal bank account before the company collapsed into bankruptcy a year ago. He said only Bankman-Fried’s small inner circle knew that he was taking customer money to fund his lifestyle.

“He had wealth, he had power, he had influence, but all of that was built on lies,” Rehn told jurors in federal court in Manhattan, N.Y., on Wednesday. “He was committing a massive fraud and taking billions of dollars from thousands of victims.”

Prosecutor­s included several references to former Alameda Research co-Chief Executive Caroline Ellison in their opening statements as one of the individual­s who knew what was going on behind the scenes. Ellison, Bankman-Fried’s former girlfriend, is the government’s star witness after reaching a cooperatio­n deal last year. Gary Wang, former FTX chief technology officer, and Nishad Singh, FTX’s former engineerin­g director, are also expected to take the stand as cooperatin­g witnesses.

The case, which the government has labeled one of the biggest financial crimes in the country’s history, will explore how an awkward 20somethin­g from California came to run and allegedly ruin one of the largest crypto exchanges in the world. The MIT graduate faces a maximum prison term of 20 years for each of the five most serious charges against him.

Bankman-Fried was expression­less as Rehn spoke, but briefly looked at the jury as the government lawyer emphasized “billions of fraud,” before turning back to stare at his laptop. The former crypto executive’s parents, a pair of Stanford University law professors, sat in the gallery behind their son.

Bankman-Fried’s lawyers said Rehn portrayed their client as a “cartoon” villain, rather than the “math nerd” he truly was.

“The evidence will give you different context — that Sam works very hard, didn’t drink or party, and went to MIT,” his lawyer Mark Cohen said during his opening arguments. “Sam didn’t intend to defraud anyone. There was no theft.”

Cohen said the “rise and fall” of FTX, and Alameda Research, an affiliated hedge fund, mirrored the wider crypto industry, which was battered by fast-changing market conditions in 2022.

“The case in many ways is about crypto from 2017 to 2022,” Cohen said. “You will learn that crypto is not for everyone.”

Bankman-Fried is accused of taking customer funds from FTX and using them to engage in speculativ­e trading through Alameda. Cohen said his client had “reasonably believed” that loans provided by Alameda were permitted and backed by collateral.

Cohen explained that FTX grew to have 350 employees, that a risk management team was not yet built and that Bankman-Fried and others executives made hundreds of decisions a day, which mean that “some things were overlooked.”

“Running a startup was like building a plane while you’re flying it,” he said.

John Reed Stark, a former SEC enforcemen­t attorney and crypto critic, said on the social media platform X, formerly Twitter, that the prosecutio­n’s “stockpile of cooperatin­g prosecutio­n witnesses is arguably unpreceden­ted for a financial fraud trial.”

“For the past year or so, these three informants together with a legion of other informants, turncoats and whistleblo­wers (who are also similarly desperate to save their own skin), have been providing the prosecutio­n with a roadmap of SBF’s alleged criminal activities,” said Stark, who now runs his own consulting company.

FTX’s terms of service as well as old Bankman-Fried tweets ensuring customers that their money was safeguarde­d were among the examples Rehn touched upon to indicate to the jury that FTX engaged in fraud.

Rehn said FTX misleading­ly told customers that the money belonged to them, not the company. “FTX’s advertisin­g slogan was about how customers could trust it,” he said.

He made reference to a Bankman-Fried tweet — “FTX has a long history of safeguardi­ng assets and that remains true today.”

“Statements about FTX keeping customer money safe were lies,” Rehn said.

 ?? Craig Ruttle Associated Press ?? JOSEPH BANKMAN and Barbara Fried arrive at a Manhattan courthouse for their son’s trial. The two Stanford law professors sat in the gallery behind him.
Craig Ruttle Associated Press JOSEPH BANKMAN and Barbara Fried arrive at a Manhattan courthouse for their son’s trial. The two Stanford law professors sat in the gallery behind him.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States