Los Angeles Times

What’s wilder than Hasan Minhaj’s tales? The truth

After an exposé on the comedian, I fear people won’t believe Muslims’ real experience­s of FBI surveillan­ce.

- By Assia Boundaoui Assia Boundaoui is an Algerian American filmmaker, a recipient of a 2022 United States Artists award and a fellow at the MIT Open Documentar­y Lab.

Lin the New Yorker detailed discrepanc­ies in comedian Hasan Minhaj’s standup specials. In one story, Minhaj recounts growing up in a Muslim community in Northern California, and his experience­s with an FBI informant, Craig Monteilh. The story was a fabricatio­n. But Monteilh was real. In the mid-2000s, he was hired by the FBI to pose as a convert to Islam and work as an informant in Orange County mosques.

I’m no comedian. I have no opinion on what the appropriat­e percentage of fact and fiction a comic’s jokes ought to be, or whether Minhaj ought to be canceled. But as a journalist and filmmaker who has spent a decade documentin­g the surveillan­ce of American Muslim communitie­s, and as an American Muslim who has experience­d it, I have felt deeply uneasy as these falsehoods came to light. I fear people will now believe that we are exaggerati­ng or making up stories about surveillan­ce. After the exposé, social media was flooded with disturbing posts — accusation­s that this is just another example of people of color falsely claiming victimhood.

But the fact is that all of us — Arab Muslims, Black Muslims, rich and poor Muslims, thirdgener­ation Muslims, newly immigrated Muslims, educated Muslims, working-class Muslims — have had our run-ins with the surveillan­ce state. And the truth is wilder than any fiction a comedian could make up.

I grew up in a neighborho­od in Chicago’s southwest suburbs of mostly Muslim Arab immigrants. My neighbors and family friends all have stories about being surveilled. About strange white men installing cameras on streetligh­ts; about unmarked cars parked in front of the mosque; about white men following people in the neighborho­od around on their daily errands; about strange clicks on the phone. When we were just kids, in the ’90s, my mom used to tell us that whenever she went to the local public library, a man would follow her in and watch her, write down what books she was reading and then follow her out.

I became a journalist and started making a documentar­y film about these anecdotes. I was intent to find out the truth. I eventually filed a freedom of informatio­n lawsuit against the FBI and demanded all records about my neighborho­od, including all the video, audio and documents related to surveillan­ce. What I found out was staggering: In 1993, the Chicago field office of the FBI had launched one of the largest domestic terrorism investigat­ions to date. It was codenamed Operation Vulgar Betrayal, and it targeted my community.

A federal judge forced the FBI to release more than 33,000 pages of documents, and while the FBI redacted more than 75% of the record, the informatio­n around the redactions tells enough of a story to validate the decades of paranoia that have shrouded my community.

The record contains dozens of “physical surveillan­ce logs” with handwritte­n initials of agents, signing in and out. Our mosque itself is listed by name as a subject of investigat­ion, along with our local Muslim elementary and high school and dozens of area businesses and charities. More than 500 individual sub-files were opened on people in the community. I came across my father’s name more than once. (Even I make a cameo appearance in one of the documents.)

Surveillan­ce was ubiquitous. Agents followed people around (“On Monday [redaction] at approximat­ely [redaction] 35mm black and white photograph­s were taken by Special Agent [redaction] of an Arabic Male [redaction] complexion…”); noted where they drove (“Arab male driving [redaction] arrived at [redaction] he parked in the driveway…”); and in one instance, even followed people into emergency rooms (“Unknown Male #1 and Unknown Male #2 were observed in the Emergency Room waiting area, accompanie­d by a male child [redaction] observed filling out hospital paperwork.”)

They monitored our local gatherings, national Muslim convention­s and our donations, and they recorded the most quotidian details about our lives. Our suspicions of what was going on paled in comparison with the reality of how intrusive and pervasive the FBI’s surveillan­ce was. No one in our community was ever convicted of anything related to terrorism, and yet we were subject to this daily harassment for decades.

Minhaj was one of the first Muslim comedians who unapologet­ically talked about being the target of surveillan­ce on a national platform. It was refreshing as hell. There’s something very powerful that happens when you talk out loud about something that we usually only whisper about. And yet the damage done by his lies will be borne not by Minhaj alone, but by the 3.5 million Muslims in this country. It makes it harder for people to be believed, and for those of us trying to tell true stories about what our communitie­s have endured.

For the past few years, I’ve gone beyond just documentin­g government surveillan­ce and have ventured into co-creating an art initiative with my community and curating a collection of home videos and family photos from the neighborho­od. The intent of the “Inverse Surveillan­ce Project,” is to counter the government’s violent archive of being watched, with a community archive of being seen.

We created an art installati­on with a large-scale labyrinth using the thousands of pages of FBI documents, and used augmented reality to superimpos­e videos from the community archive onto the redacted spaces of the government’s surveillan­ce record. In this way, the history of our community isn’t just something that the FBI gets to secretly record but is something we get to communally create. By telling our own stories, we get to have control over our narrative and how our community will be remembered.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States