‘Fortnite’ maker beats Google in antitrust suit
Jury sides with Epic Games and says app store has a monopoly. Ruling could cost the tech giant billions.
Google’s mobile app store maintains a monopoly in the market for distribution of programs and payments on its Android software, a federal jury in California has decided, dealing a blow to the technology giant in a high-stakes antitrust battle with Epic Games Inc.
The internet giant’s Play store willfully wields monopoly power through the Alphabet Inc. unit’s anti-competitive conduct, jurors found Monday after deliberating less than four hours following a nearly monthlong trial in San Francisco.
The ruling could potentially jeopardize billions of dollars of revenue generated by Google’s app store. Epic largely lost a similar challenge to Apple Inc.’s app store two years ago.
U.S. District Judge James Donato, who oversaw the trial, will decide whether Google must open the door for payment and app distribution methods outside its own app store after the verdict that Google Play policies are unlawful.
Google, whose shares slipped 0.8% Tuesday to $133.64, said it plans to challenge the verdict.
“Android and Google Play provide more choice and openness than any other major mobile platform,” said Wilson White, Google’s vice president of government affairs and public policy. “The trial made clear that we compete fiercely with Apple and its App Store, as well as app stores on Android devices and gaming consoles.”
Tim Sweeney, chief executive of Epic, flashed a slight smile as he sat in the front row of the public seating area of the courtroom after the verdict was read.
Sweeney quickly hailed the ruling on social network X, writing: “Victory over Google! After 4 weeks of detailed court testimony, the California jury found against the Google Play monopoly on all counts. The Court’s work on remedies will start in January. Thanks for everyone’s support and faith! Free Fortnite!”
Stanford University law professor Mark Lemley said the verdict “has the potential to be a very big deal — not just for Epic, which will get the ability to sell directly on Android phones, but for the entire internet.”
“The last two decades have seen a profound shift away from the open internet towards walled gardens,” he said. “That is one of the things that has kept the internet market so concentrated. This verdict just knocked a big hole in the garden wall.”
Lawyer Paul Swanson, a partner at Holland & Hart who specializes in technology and antitrust law, said “a sweeping verdict like this is going to be hard for Google to undo.”
Epic sued Google three years ago, alleging the company monopolized the Android app distribution market for more than a decade by striking side deals with rivals and using its resources to thwart competition.
Google contended that its partnerships help phones that run on the Android system better compete against Apple’s iPhone.
“Epic wants you to give them a deal that they don’t have and they haven’t been able to get anywhere else,” Jonathan Kravis, a lawyer for Google, said in his closing argument. “A deal that would effectively let them use the Play store for free.”