Los Angeles Times

House GOP backs Biden impeachmen­t inquiry

Vote is a formality, but it puts Republican­s in competitiv­e 2024 races on record for supporting the move.

- By Erin B. Logan and Matt Hamilton

WASHINGTON — House Republican­s on Wednesday voted to formalize an impeachmen­t inquiry against President Biden, intensifyi­ng their investigat­ion into unproven allegation­s that the president benefited from his son’s overseas business dealings.

The vote is a formality, but it puts the House GOP — including vulnerable California members who face competitiv­e reelection contests next year — on record in support of moving toward impeaching Biden. ThenSpeake­r Kevin McCarthy (R-Bakersfiel­d), egged on by former President Trump and the most far-right members of his caucus, launched the inquiry without a vote in September.

The inquiry has yet to produce evidence that proves the GOP’s longstandi­ng, unproven claim that Biden benefited from his son Hunter’s overseas business dealings.

The Constituti­on does not require the chamber to vote to launch an impeachmen­t inquiry, legal experts told The Times. Still, Republican­s have sought to portray formalizin­g the inquiry as a way to aid investigat­ors.

“Short of declaring war, impeachmen­t is the most serious act Congress can take,” Tom McClintock (RElk Grove), said in a floor speech before the vote. “We owe it to the country to get to the bottom of these allegation­s. And that requires the House to objectivel­y invoke its full investigat­ory powers, respect the due process

rights of all involved and lay all of the facts before the American people.”

The 221-212 vote strictly along party lines.

Ahead of the floor vote, Rep. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, which is leading the inquiry, decried the investigat­ion, calling it a partisan move that will waste taxpayer dollars to appease the far right.

“After 11 months nobody can tell you what Joe Biden’s alleged crime is, where it happened, what the motive was or who the victims are,” the Maryland Democrat said at a news conference before the vote.

He added: Republican­s have a “mountain of evidence, but all the evidence shows that Joe Biden is not guilty of any presidenti­al offenses.”

House Republican­s have been calling for Biden’s impeachmen­t since Trump left office in 2021. One day after the president’s inaugurati­on, then-freshman Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (RGa.) filed the first impeachmen­t articles against Biden. fell

She and other far-right lawmakers and GOP operatives have tried connecting the president with his son Hunter’s foreign business dealings. Though Hunter Biden is under federal indictment for unrelated crimes, House investigat­ors have not produced evidence to charge the president with malfeasanc­e.

It is unclear when the House inquiry will end or whether it will produce charges the lower chamber will vote on. If the House votes to impeach Biden, the Democratic-controlled Senate will hold a trial, which requires a two-thirds majority to convict. The Senate has never removed a president from office.

Rep. James Comer (RKy.), chairman of the House Oversight Committee, told reporters after the vote that he “would love to finish [the inquiry] as soon as possible.”

“We have people we need to depose, then we’ll issue a report,” he said, adding that the committee’s goal is not necessaril­y to impeach Biden but to investigat­e, issue a report and “pass influencep­eddling

legislatio­n.”

Some Republican­s in both chambers have expressed skepticism about the inquiry. So has the White House, which has been working in overdrive to bash the GOP for what administra­tion officials have characteri­zed as a baseless inquiry designed to appease Trump, who was twice impeached by House Democrats.

President Biden denounced the vote. “Instead of doing their job on the urgent work that needs to be done, [House Republican­s] are choosing to waste time on this baseless political stunt that even Republican­s in Congress admit is not supported by facts,” he said in a statement.

In 2019, the Democratic­controlled House impeached Trump for abuse of power and obstructin­g Congress’ impeachmen­t inquiry into his threats to withhold military aid from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky unless Zelensky launched an investigat­ion of Biden, then a candidate for president. The House in 2021 again impeached Trump for inciting the Jan. 6 insurrecti­on. (The Senate twice declined to convict.)

The Wednesday vote will probably aid Republican­s in deep red districts in fending off challenges from far-right candidates by helping them prove their loyalty to Trump. The vote is also likely to aid Democratic challenger­s in competitiv­e districts who are eager to win over moderates by tying GOP incumbents to the former president, who is unpopular among swing voters.

The vote could come back to haunt swing-district Republican candidates. A majority of voters in competitiv­e districts view the investigat­ion as baseless, according to an early December survey commission­ed by Congressio­nal Integrity Project, a Democratic­aligned nonprofit, and conducted by Public Policy Polling.

The survey found that 52% of voters saw the impeachmen­t inquiry as designed to damage Biden politicall­y. Most Trump voters — 85% — said the investigat­ion was more about finding the truth. Fifty-six percent of people who declined to back either presidenti­al candidate in 2020 characteri­zed the inquiry as more of a serious effort to investigat­e important problems.

The Congressio­nal Integrity Project recently launched a “seven-figure campaign” in California and other competitiv­e districts targeting Republican­s who backed formalizin­g the inquiry, according to Matthew Herdman, a spokesman for the nonprofit.

The group purchased digital ads and mobile billboards targeting vulnerable Republican­s, including Reps. John Duarte of Modesto, Mike Garcia of Santa Clarita, Young Kim of Anaheim Hills, Michelle Steel of Seal Beach and David Valadao of Hanford. Their races are rated as competitiv­e by the Cook Political Report, a nonpartisa­n outfit that focuses on congressio­nal races.

Digital ads going after candidates such as Garcia say that House Republican­s have struggled to “pass a budget or desperatel­y needed aid in Ukraine” and have instead focused on formalizin­g a “bogus impeachmen­t inquiry into President Biden without a single shred of evidence that the president did anything wrong.”

“Mike Garcia promised to focus on real priorities, not political stunts,” one ad said.

Ben Petersen, a spokesman for the National Republican Congressio­nal Committee, defended the GOP in a statement. The vote “grants Congress necessary investigat­ive tools to properly conduct its critical oversight role,” Petersen said. “Americans demand a government free from corruption and they are concerned Joe Biden does not meet that standard.”

As part of the inquiry into Biden family members’ business dealings, House investigat­ors subpoenaed Hunter Biden last month to testify Wednesday morning in a private deposition. In advance of the deposition, the younger Biden’s lawyers repeatedly sought to hold the questionin­g in public, arguing that an open proceeding would prevent selective leaks of his remarks.

Hunter Biden defied the subpoena and instead held a news conference outside the Capitol in which he reiterated his desire for a public hearing and attacked Republican­s for “distortion­s, manipulate­d evidence and lies.”

He has pleaded not guilty to the charges in Delaware. In the California case, his lawyers have emphasized that their client had long ago paid his tax debts and that his mishandled financial affairs coincided with the depths of his drug and alcohol addiction.

 ?? Tom Williams CQ-Roll Call ?? REPS. Michelle Steel (R-Seal Beach), left, Mike Garcia (R-Santa Clarita) and Young Kim (R-Anaheim Hills) are among those in competitiv­e reelection races.
Tom Williams CQ-Roll Call REPS. Michelle Steel (R-Seal Beach), left, Mike Garcia (R-Santa Clarita) and Young Kim (R-Anaheim Hills) are among those in competitiv­e reelection races.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States