Los Angeles Times

House vote to impeach Mayorkas fails

A few Republican­s refuse to go along with their party to punish the Homeland Security secretary.

- By Lisa Mascaro Mascaro writes for the Associated Press.

WASHINGTON — In a dramatic setback, House Republican­s failed Tuesday to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro N. Mayorkas, forced to shelve a high-profile priority — for now — after a few GOP lawmakers refused to go along with the party’s plan.

The stunning roll call fell just a few votes short of impeaching Mayorkas, stalling the Republican­s’ drive to punish the Biden administra­tion over its handling of the U.S.-Mexico border. With Democrats united against the charges, the Republican­s needed almost every vote from their slim majority to approve the articles of impeachmen­t.

The House is likely to revisit plans to impeach Mayorkas, but next steps are highly uncertain.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said he personally spoke to the GOP holdouts, acknowledg­ing the “heavy, heavy” vote as he sought their support.

“It’s an extreme measure,” Johnson said. “But extreme times call for extreme measures.”

Not since 1876 has a Cabinet secretary faced impeachmen­t charges — 148 years ago, Secretary of War William Belknap resigned just before the vote.

The impeachmen­t charges against Mayorkas come as border security is fast becoming a top political issue in the 2024 election, a particular­ly potent line of attack being leveled at President Biden by Republican­s, led by the party’s front-runner for the nomination, former President Trump.

Record numbers of people have been arriving at the southern border, many fleeing countries around the world, in what Mayorkas calls an era of global migration. Many are seeking asylum and being conditiona­lly released into the U.S., arriving in cities underequip­ped to provide housing and other aid while they await judicial proceeding­s, which can take years to determine whether they may remain.

The House Democrats united against the two articles of impeachmen­t against Mayorkas, calling the proceeding­s a sham designed to please Trump, charges that do not rise to the Constituti­on’s bar of treason, bribery or “high crimes and misdemeano­rs.”

“A bunch of garbage,” Rep. Jim McGovern (DMass.) said. He called Mayorkas “a good man, a decent man,” who is simply trying to do his job.

Even if Republican­s are eventually able to impeach Mayorkas, he is not expected to be convicted in a trial in the Senate, where Republican senators have been cool to the effort. The Senate could simply refer the matter to a committee for its own investigat­ion, delaying immediate action.

The Mayorkas impeachmen­t proceeding­s landed quickly onto the House agenda after Republican efforts to impeach Biden over the business dealings of his son, Hunter Biden, hit a lull, and the investigat­ion into the Biden family drags.

The Committee on Homeland Security under Chairman Mark Green (RTenn.) had been investigat­ing the secretary for much of the last year, including probing the flow of deadly fentanyl into the U.S. But a resolution from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), a Trump ally, pushed it to the fore. The panel swiftly held a pair of hearings in January before announcing the two articles of impeachmen­t against Mayorkas.

Unlike other moments in impeachmen­t history, the arguments played out to an almost empty chamber, without the fervor or solemnity of past proceeding­s.

Republican Rep. Eli Crane if Arizona said Mayorkas had committed a “derelictio­n of duty.”

Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said the Mayorkas impeachmen­t vote was a stunt designed by Republican­s to sow “chaos and confusion” and appease Trump, rather than to govern.

“No reasonable American can conclude that you’re making life better for them by this sham impeachmen­t,” Jeffries said.

A former federal prosecutor, the secretary never testified on his own behalf but submitted a rare letter to the panel defending his work.

Tuesday’s vote arrived at a politicall­y odd juncture for Mayorkas, who has been shuttling to the Senate to negotiate a bipartisan border security package, earning high marks from a group of senators involved.

But that legislatio­n, which emerged Sunday as one of the most ambitious immigratio­n overhauls in years, is heading toward instant defeat in a Wednesday test vote. Trump sharply criticized the bipartisan effort, other Republican­s are panning it, and Speaker Johnson says it’s “dead on arrival.”

In the impeachmen­t vote, California Republican Rep. Tom McClintock of Elk Grove announced his opposition, saying the charges “fail to identify an impeachabl­e crime that Mayorkas has committed.”

The conservati­ve McClintock said in a lengthy memo that the articles of impeachmen­t from the committee explain the problems at the border under Biden’s watch. But, he said, “they stretch and distort the Constituti­on.”

Another Republican, retiring Rep. Ken Buck of Colorado, also said he was against impeaching Mayorkas.

Impeachmen­t, once rare in the U.S., has been used as both a constituti­onal check on the executive and increasing­ly as a political weapon.

The House Republican­s this session of Congress have put a priority on impeachmen­ts, censures and other rebukes of officials and lawmakers, setting a new standard that is concerning scholars and others for the ways in which Congress can dole out punishment­s for perceived transgress­ions.

Experts have argued that Mayorkas has simply been snared in a policy dispute with Republican­s who disapprove of the Biden administra­tion’s approach to the border situation.

Constituti­onal law expert Jonathan Turley said impeachmen­t is not to be used for being “a bad Cabinet member.” Lawyer Alan Dershowitz wrote, “Whatever else Mayorkas may or may not have done, he has not committed bribery, treason, or high crimes and misdemeano­rs.”

Scholars point out that the Constituti­on’s framers initially considered “maladminis­tration” as an impeachabl­e offense, but dropped it over concern of giving the legislativ­e branch too much sway over the executive and disrupting the balance of power.

Three former secretarie­s of the Department of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff, Janet Napolitano and Jeh Johnson, said in a letter Tuesday that impeaching the Cabinet official over policy disputes would “jeopardize our national security.”

Trump was twice impeached — first in 2019 on a charge of abuse of power over his phone call with the Ukrainian president seeking a favor to dig up dirt on thenrival Biden, and later on the charge of inciting the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrecti­on at the Capitol. He was acquitted on both impeachmen­ts in the Senate.

 ?? HOMELAND SECURITY Susan Walsh Associated Press ?? Secretary Alejandro N. Mayorkas didn’t testify on his own behalf but submitted a letter defending his work.
HOMELAND SECURITY Susan Walsh Associated Press Secretary Alejandro N. Mayorkas didn’t testify on his own behalf but submitted a letter defending his work.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States