Los Angeles Times

New attempt to ban tampons with PFAS

After Newsom veto last year, state lawmakers introduce another bill targeting ‘forever chemicals.’

- By Mackenzie Mays

SACRAMENTO — A new bill could ban the sale of tampons and other menstrual products that contain potentiall­y toxic chemicals in California, reigniting a push by women’s rights groups and environmen­talists that Gov. Gavin Newsom rejected last year.

Under a proposal introduced by Assemblyme­mber Diane Papan (D-San Mateo), the state would be required to identify and assess the hazards of perfluoroa­lkyl and polyfluoro­alkyl substances, or PFAS, in menstrual products and make that informatio­n available to the public.

Exposure to some PFAS — deemed “forever chemicals” because of their indestruct­ibility — has been tied to kidney cancer, increases in cholestero­l, liver dysfunctio­n and preeclamps­ia, a serious pregnancy complicati­on, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recent research has found those chemicals in some brands of popular tampons and pads.

“This is a step in protecting women from PFAS in one of the most intimate ways that it can be exposed to our bodies,” Papan said at a news conference last week at the state Capitol.

A similar bill introduced last year saw bipartisan support and not a single “no” vote in the Legislatur­e but Newsom vetoed it, despite saying he “strongly” supported its intent. The Democratic governor, who has otherwise championed policies protecting women’s health, said such chemical bans have proved difficult to implement and caused confusion.

“I am concerned that this bill falls short of providing enhanced protection to California consumers due to lack of regulatory oversight,” Newsom said in his veto message last year, adding that there have been “inconsiste­nt” interpreta­tions of existing laws by manufactur­ers regarding restrictio­ns.

Newsom has signed laws that prohibit PFAS in food packaging and in cosmetics but vetoed other proposals to ban the chemicals in cleaning products and artificial turf, citing similar regulation problems.

The new iteration of the bill known as the Tampon Act directs the California Department of Toxic Substances Control to engage with industry leaders before issuing regulation­s in response to Newsom’s concerns.

“We feel that that is definitely something that will put the veto message to bed,” Papan said.

If approved by the Legislatur­e and governor, the law would go into effect in 2027 and impose fines for companies found to violate the new prohibitio­n and allow a path for consumers to sue.

Papan said that there is no cost associated with the bill and that it could generate funding for the state by collecting fines from tampon producers found in violation of the new law.

One consumer study conducted in 2022 found that out of 23 tampon brands tested, 22% contained indication­s of PFAS. The study, conducted by the environmen­tal watchdog group Mamavation in partnershi­p with Environmen­tal Health News, found traces of forever chemicals in some Playtex and Tampax products, as well as some tampons labeled as organic.

PFAS have also been found in nonstick cookware and drinking water, according to the Environmen­tal Protection Agency.

“We have to figure out the regulatory side of this issue ... because we can’t choose not to address it,” Assemblyme­mber Pilar Schiavo (DChatswort­h) said last week.

Tampons have been a point of legislatio­n in California before. In 2021, Newsom signed a bill into law that requires public schools to offer free menstrual products. In 2019, he temporaril­y eliminated a sales tax on menstrual products.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States