Los Angeles Times

Columbine was 25 years ago. Is such violence normal now?

- By Sonali Rajan Sonali Rajan is a professor at Teachers College, Columbia University and the inaugural president of the Research Society for the Prevention of Firearm-Related Harms.

Twenty-five years ago on April 20, 1999, one teacher and 12 students were shot and killed by two seniors at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colo. Another 21 members of the Columbine school community were injured in this shooting and countless lives devastated. That kind of mass violence — and in a school no less — was unthinkabl­e at the time. Yet the past quarter-century has tragically and frustratin­gly shown that we have failed to keep schoolchil­dren safe.

The communitie­s of Newtown, Conn., Parkland, Fla., and Uvalde, Texas, like Littleton, were subsequent­ly forced to contend with the unimaginab­le. And so too have hundreds of others that have not made the national news despite gun violence in their schools.

Data from the Washington Post allow us to estimate that more than 370,000 K-12 students have been exposed to firearm violence since Columbine. And data my colleagues and

I are gathering show that there have been nearly 350 intentiona­l school shootings in K-12 public schools since 2015, meaning these events have taken place during school hours and with a perpetrato­r’s intent to harm someone else. Firearms are now the leading cause of death among all children and teens in the U.S. and for nearly 20 years prior were the leading cause of death among Black children, reflecting significan­t disparitie­s that have recently gotten worse.

Indeed, 25 years after Columbine — alongside the rise of school shootings and the correspond­ing rise of a multibilli­on-dollar school security industry — it is the anticipati­on of firearm violence that overwhelmi­ngly shapes many aspects of a school, including its safety policies, disciplina­ry strategies, physical layout and budget. Research estimates that $14.5 billion per year is now spent on school resource officers and security guards. And various states have pushed for structural changes such as installing physical barriers around school grounds, implementi­ng bulletproo­f windows and increasing the use of metal detectors as ways to safeguard campuses. But there is no evidence these efforts work. Moreover, they often take resources away from the kinds of investment­s children and schools would actually benefit from.

Instead of investing in the meaningful prevention of shootings, schools have been organized around the inevitabil­ity of this kind of violence. An increasing number of districts are arming their teachers with firearms, despite the lack of evidence guiding the effectiven­ess of such policies. Lockdown drills are now ubiquitous in schools across the U.S., and 1 in 4 teachers reported that their school experience­d a firearm-related lockdown within the last year.

School shootings shouldn’t be an inevitabil­ity, yet schools are forced to treat them like they are.

As research has shown, ready access to firearms increases the likelihood of intentiona­l shootings on school grounds. There is also a rigorous evidence base that provides clear guidance as to which specific policy measures could significan­tly reduce acts of firearm violence in schools: bans on large-capacity magazines, the implementa­tion of safe storage and child access prevention laws and extreme risk protection orders, among others. But over the last 25 years there have been limited efforts by elected officials to implement the policies that we know would have a meaningful effect.

Encouragin­gly, and after more than two decades of no federal funding for research on gun violence prevention, Congress is now helping finance this rapidly growing field that is actively contributi­ng additional solutions and insights. New research is highlighti­ng the promise of anonymous reporting systems that allow students to privately provide tips about potential gun violence, as well as the effects of gun-free school zones. It is also showing how school and community investment­s in public libraries, bystander interventi­ons and universal school-based violence prevention programs, among others, together contribute to safer schools. This groundswel­l of new science is providing guidance for policymake­rs to help scale solutions that work.

There is undoubtedl­y much still to be done. And the best research can only accomplish so much without significan­t gun safety legislatio­n. But 25 years after Columbine, it’s clear that our nation can do better.

Just as the U.S. is making significan­t strides to “end cancer as we know it” and has set the goal for motor vehicle road deaths at zero, a goal must be establishe­d for the country to eradicate school shootings. In another 25 years, and hopefully sooner, schools should be spaces free from firearm violence, where all children can thrive.

An estimated 370,000 students have been exposed to firearm violence since the shooting at Columbine High School a quarter-century ago.

 ?? A BOY Eric Gay Associated Press ?? looks through a fence at the Littleton, Colo., school, where 13 were killed on April 20, 1999.
A BOY Eric Gay Associated Press looks through a fence at the Littleton, Colo., school, where 13 were killed on April 20, 1999.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States