Marin Independent Journal

Climate change imperils 60% of Superfund sites

- By Ellen Knickmeyer The Associated Press

WASHINGTON >> At least 60% of U.S. Super fund sites are in areas vulnerable to flooding or other worsening disasters of climate change, and the Trump administra­tion’s reluctance to directly acknowledg­e global warming is deterring efforts to safeguard them, a congressio­nal watchdog agency says.

In a report issued on Monday, the Government Accountabi­lity Office called on Environmen­tal Protection Agency Administra­tor Andrew Wheeler to state directly that dealing with the rising risks of seas, storms or wildfires breaching Superfund sites under climate change is part of the agency’smission.

The findings in the report, obtained earlier by The Associated Press, emphasize the challenges for government agencies under President Donald Trump, who frequently mocks scientists’ urgent warnings on global heating. Wheeler’s highest-profile public remarks on the matter came in a March CBS interview, when he called global heating “an important change” but not one of the agency’s most pressing problems.

“Most of the threats fromclimat­e change are 50 to 75 years out,” Wheeler said then, rejecting conclusion­s by scientists that damage to climate from fossil fuel emissions already is making natural disasters fiercer and more frequent.

Largely avoiding the words “climate change,” the agency in a formal response rejected the GAO finding that the agency was making a mistake by not spelling out that hardening Superfund sites against a worsening climate was part and parcel of the EPA’s mission.

The EPA believes “the Superfund program’s existing processes and resources adequately ensure that risks and any adverse effects of severe weather events, that may increase in intensity, duration, or frequency, are woven into risk assessment­s,” assistant EPA administra­tor PeterWrigh­t wrote the GAO in response.

The GAO review comes after a 2017 review by The Associated Press found that 2 million people in the U.S. live within a mile (1.6 kilometers) of 327 Superfund sites in areas prone to flooding or vulnerable to sea level rise caused by climate change. The AP analyzed national flood zone maps, census data and EPA records in the wake of Hurricane Harvey, which flooded more than a dozen Superfund sites in the Houston area, with breaches reported at two. At the time, an EPA spokesman derided AP’s reporting as “fear-mongering.”

GAO investigat­ors looked at 1,571 Superfund sites, contaminat­ed locations that, according to the EPA website, exist nationally due to hazardous waste being dumped, left out in the open or otherwise improper ly managed. That number does not include Superfund sites owned by the Defense Department and other federal agencies.

At least 945 of them are in areas that scientists have identified as at greater risk of floods, storm surge from major hurricanes, wildfires or sea-level rise of 3 feet (0.9 meters) or more, the GAO says.

Broken down, that includes 783 Superfund sites at greater risk of flooding under climate change, 234 Superfund sites at high or very high risk from wildfires and 187 sites vulnerable to storm surge from any Category 4 or 5 hurricane, the researcher­s said.

Senate Democrats asked for the review of how ready EPA’s Superfund program is for climate change.

Sen. TomCarper of Delaware, the senior Democrat on the Senate’s Environmen­t and Public Works Committee, urged the agency to follow the GAO’s recommenda­tions.

“By refusing to address the worsening impacts of climate change— from flooding to wildfires to more frequent extreme weather events — at our nation’s Superfund sites, this EPA is putting public health at risk,” Carper said.

GAO investigat­ors cited California’s 150- yearold Iron Mountain mine, where Superfund operators daily prevent tons of toxic sludge from pouring into the Sacramento River system, source of one-fifth of the state’s water.

Scientists say that the state’s increasing, and increasing­ly intense, wildfires are a sign of what the country will be seeing as the climate deteriorat­es. Onemajor wildfire last year overran the Iron Mountain Superfund site, nearly destroying its water-treatment system and risking a massive, poisonous explosion if f lames reached the heart of the mine, the GAO said. Firefighte­rs used special gear to stop the flames. Operators of the Superfund site have since swapped out PCB pipes carrying away the toxic waste for flameresis­tant steel ones.

And east of Houston along the San Jacinto River, record rains under Hurricane Harvey in 2017 again dissolved part of a temporary cap on a 40- acre (16-hectare) Superfund site, exposing contaminat­ed material. EPA testing there afterward found dioxin at more than 2,000 times the maximum recommende­d level.

When it comes to climate change, Superfund sites in that coastal part of Texas “are incredibly vulnerable,” said Jackie Young, head of the Texas Health and Environmen­t Alliance advocacy group. While the EPA has since directed that the toxic waste at the damaged site be moved to higher ground, other Superfund sites in the area are still at risk, Young said.

“It’s highly unacceptab­le that our communitie­s and our first responders” in hurricanes and other disasters “may be exposed to contaminan­ts someone left decades prior,” Young said Friday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States