Marin Independent Journal

Getting vaccinatio­n should be personal choice

-

The COVID-19 vaccine is here. There are many who can benefit. However, the general public has never been given accurate informatio­n on vaccine safety. In the 1980s, the federal government establishe­d the National Vaccine Injury Compensati­on Program for those injured by vaccines.

The purpose of the fund is to shield pharmaceut­ical companies from liability. Because there are no lawsuits against pharmaceut­ical companies for vaccine injury, the general public has little understand­ing of vaccine risks. Instead we read and watch news stories denouncing “anti-vaxxers” as kooks and conspiracy theorists.

I was injured by a diphtheria booster shot in 2019. I’m not alone; I now belong to a Facebook group with almost 250,000 members — people who have been injured by vaccines or have relatives who have been injured.

Vaccines trigger the immune system. This can lead to chronic autoimmune problems, not just an “allergic reaction” that lasts a few hours or days. I wasn’t screened, nor was I counseled on risks and benefits. All medical interventi­ons are supposed to be preceded by a discussion of risks and benefits. This informatio­n is supposed to come from the doctor ordering the interventi­on and the patient is supposed to have an opportunit­y to ask questions. Without a discussion of risks and benefits there is no informed consent, which is malpractic­e.

COVID-19 is devastatin­g to some people. It’s true that it cannot always be predicted who will die or become very sick. But it should be a personal decision whether to have the vaccine. The right to refuse a medical interventi­on is a basic right. All people should receive accurate informatio­n on any medical interventi­on they are contemplat­ing. The general public also deserves to know whether the vaccinated might still get a contagious mild or asymptomat­ic case of COVID-19.

— Anne Rettenberg, San Rafael

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States