Marin Independent Journal

Republican­s struggle to fight rescue plan

Republican­s are struggling to persuade voters to oppose President Joe Biden’s economic rescue plan.

- By Emily Cochrane and Jim Tankersley

Republican­s are struggling to persuade voters to oppose President Joe Biden’s $1.9 trillion economic rescue plan, which enjoys strong, bipartisan support nationwide even as it is moving through Congress with just Democratic backing.

Democrats who control the House are preparing to approve the package by the end of next week, with the Senate aiming to soon follow with its own party-line vote before unemployme­nt benefits are set to lapse in mid-March. On Friday, the House Budget Committee unveiled the nearly 600page text for the proposal, which includes billions of dollars for unemployme­nt benefits, small businesses and stimulus checks.

Republican leaders, searching for a way to derail the proposal, Friday led a final attempt to tarnish the package, labeling it a “payoff to progressiv­es.” The bill, they said, spends too much and includes a liberal wish list of programs like aid to state and local government­s — which they call a “blue state bailout,” though many states facing shortfalls are controlled by Republican­s — and increased benefits for the unemployed, which they argued would discourage people from looking for work.

Those attacks have followed weeks of varying Republican objections to the package, including warnings that it would do little to help the economy recover and grow, that it would add to the federal budget deficit and possibly unleash faster inflation, and that Democrats were violating Biden’s calls for “unity” by proceeding without bipartisan consensus.

The arguments have so far failed to connect, in part because many of its core provisions poll strongly — even with Republican­s.

More than 7 in 10 Americans now back Biden’s aid package, according to new polling from online research firm SurveyMonk­ey for The New York Times. That includes support from three-quarters of independen­t voters, 2 in 5 Republican­s and nearly all Democrats. The overall support for the bill is even larger than the substantia­l majority of voters who said in January that they favored an endof-year economic aid bill signed into law by President Donald Trump.

While Biden has encouraged Republican lawmakers to get on board with his package, Democrats are moving their bill through Congress using a parliament­ary process that will allow them to pass it with only Democratic votes.

“Critics say my plan is too big, that it cost $1.9 trillion dollars; that’s too much,” Biden said at an event Friday. “Let me ask them, what would they have me cut?”

House Republican leaders Friday urged their rank-and-file members to vote against the plan, billing it as Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California’s “Payoff to Progressiv­es Act.” They detailed more than a dozen objections to the bill, including “a third round of stimulus checks costing more than $422 billion, which will include households that have experience­d little or no financial loss during the pandemic.” Pelosi’s office issued its own rebuttal soon after, declaring “Americans need help. House Republican­s don’t care.”

Republican­s have also railed against the process Democrats have employed to advance the bill, citing dozens of legislativ­e amendments that Republican­s offered in various committees, which Democrats rejected. Last week, top Republican senators complained in a letter to Democratic committee leadership about plans to bypass Senate hearings on the House bill, describing it as “the outsourcin­g of their own committee gavels to the House.”

The Republican pushback is complicate­d by the pandemic’s ongoing economic pain, with millions of Americans still out of work and the recovery slowing. It is also hampered by the fact that many of the lawmakers objecting to Biden’s proposals supported similar provisions, including direct checks to individual­s, when Trump was president.

“What they’ve tried to do is pick apart individual pieces of it,” Rep. Richard E. Neal, D-Mass., the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, said in an interview. “But I think on an overall basis, you have to contrast that with how well this is being received across the country.”

Some Republican lawmakers and aides acknowledg­e the challenge they face in trying to explain to voters why they object to the package, particular­ly after reaching agreement with Democrats on several rounds of aid earlier in the crisis. Many of those negotiatio­ns were contentiou­s and stretched for months; Biden has said he will not wait for Republican­s to join his effort, citing the urgency of the economy’s needs.

“We’ve shown over five different bills we can do it together,” said Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., one of the lawmakers who had met privately with Biden to discuss both economic relief and infrastruc­ture plans. “I think we’re going to have to draw a contrast of what’s in there and does not make sense.”

The scattersho­t critique is a contrast from the last time a president used the parliament­ary move, called budget reconcilia­tion, to push a major proposal: the $1.5 trillion tax cut package that Trump and congressio­nal Republican­s passed in 2017 without any Democratic votes. Shortly before the first House hearing on the tax cuts, Democrats on the Ways and Means Committee made a plan to brand the bill as a “tax scam” benefiting the rich and the powerful, before Republican­s could sell it as a boon to the middle class.

Many Republican­s remain confident that their attacks will begin to resonate in this debate. One senior Republican aide, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that with attention focused on the legislatio­n this week, members would continue to highlight provisions that are seen as longtime liberal priorities, as well as the money left over from previous relief packages. Republican­s also plan to question whether the new funds would deliver on promises to improve the economy and reopen schools.

“I think we do have an obligation to ask questions, ” said Rep. Tom Reed of New York, one of the moderate Republican­s who initially spoke with White House officials in a bid to reach a compromise. He predicted that once voters focused on individual provisions that demonstrat­ed the package’s largess and overreach, they would sour on the overall proposal.

“It’s human nature, and I get it, but can we try to move forward in a much more productive manner?” Reed added, echoing the process complaints already percolatin­g among Republican­s in both chambers.

Polls suggest that could be a tough fight for Republican­s, as many of the bill’s provisions are widely popular. In the SurveyMonk­ey poll, 4 in 5 respondent­s said it was important for the relief bill to include $1,400 direct checks, including nearly 7 in 10 Republican­s. A similarly large group of respondent­s said it was important to include aid to state and local government­s and money for vaccine deployment.

Given their slim majority in the House and the strict parameters that allow them to avoid the filibuster in the Senate, Democrats can afford few, if any, defections in order to send the legislatio­n to Biden’s desk before unemployme­nt benefits begin to lapse in March.

 ??  ??
 ?? STEFANI REYNOLDS — THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Rep. Tom Reed, R-N.Y., was one of the moderate Republican­s who initially spoke with White House officials in a bid to reach a compromise on the stimulus package.
STEFANI REYNOLDS — THE NEW YORK TIMES Rep. Tom Reed, R-N.Y., was one of the moderate Republican­s who initially spoke with White House officials in a bid to reach a compromise on the stimulus package.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States