Marin Independent Journal

Turning a friend’s story into a success

‘Last Resort’ a fun thriller of stolen intellectu­al property

- By Molly Young

Cowardly, avaricious, annoying, territoria­l, deceitful, opportunis­tic: There aren’t enough shady adjectives in the dictionary to describe the narrator of Andrew Lipstein’s “Last Resort” (291 pages, Farrar, Straus & Giroux, $27). What fun! One great thing about the well-drawn weasels of fiction is that you can always locate a bit of yourself in them.

“Last Resort” is about a novelist who has stolen the plot of his bestsellin­g book from a story relayed to him by an acquaintan­ce. Now, if you read last year’s “The Plot,” by Jean Hanff Korelitz, you’ll notice that this novel has a similar, uh, plot as that one. Given the timelines of publishing, it is certain that the emergence of these — not identical, but let’s say fraternal-twin — stories within months of each other is pure coincidenc­e. But there must be something in the air that has led to the double helping of this Faustian-bargain varietal.

Both novels are anti-Künstlerro­man — books not about the formation of genuine artists but about the self-destructio­n of phony ones. They are both thrillers about, of all things, intellectu­al property. Korelitz’s book was tighter and darker. Lipstein’s is funnier. Both are incredibly entertaini­ng.

Caleb is the Faust of “Last Resort,” an aspiring novelist in his 20s who lacks a compelling subject until he reunites with a college buddy named Avi, who recounts a set of remarkable recent events — Greek island, doomed affair, group sex with repressed married couple, death — which Caleb appraises the way an antiques dealer might study the marquetry on a Louis XVI secretaire. Soon, with nary a scruple, Caleb expands Avi’s anecdote into a full-length novel with enough commercial viability to land its unknown author a flashy agent.

When the agent shops the manuscript around, Avi — who, to Caleb’s dismay, has switched careers and now works in publishing — discovers the betrayal. The two men meet under the eye of a lawyer and come to an agreement: Avi’s name will be printed on the book, as its author, but all the money will go to Caleb. (Not being a literary agent, I was curious as to whether this premise was realistic or bonkers. I asked an agent of considerab­le experience. He replied that it was “a stretch but not out of this world.”)

Caleb’s novel turns out to be a smash, though it might be more accurate to describe what he has written as “content” — a substance designed to be digested and excreted with minimal demands on the consumer’s brain. From the very first meeting with his agent, Caleb is thinking about marketing, not art: typefaces (Caslon, specifical­ly — he’s kind of basic) and deckled edges and the Frankfurt Book Fair.

This is where alarm bells are meant to sound in the reader’s mind. Aha! we think: Caleb is not an artist but a careerist! And the careerist must suffer humiliatio­n and defeat; he must be unmasked as a fraud; he must be dumped by a worthy woman who has mistakenly projected her sterling values onto him. Also, he should probably be sued.

Or — should he? If Lipstein had written a less cunning book, he might have contrasted Caleb with a character who represente­d artistic purity, whatever that is. But everyone here sits somewhere on the grifter spectrum, including the real people (Avi, doomed woman, repressed married couple) upon whom Caleb’s characters are based.

Lipstein seems ambivalent, as he must be, about the compromise­s required of anyone who wants to earn money selling words. It’s hard to skip innocently into a profession­al writing career. The pool of aspirants is too large and the quantity of jobs too small, and of those jobs only a teaspoonfu­l are remunerati­ve enough to pay for such things as rent. But Lipstein isn’t implying that a person must either be celestiall­y lucky or satanicall­y unprincipl­ed or both in order to “make it.”

Caleb, for one thing, is not an evil genius. An evil genius wouldn’t send self-incriminat­ing text messages (first rule of being evil: put nothing in writing), nor would he fail to change the names of the people he’s novelizing. What type of doofus fails to cover his tracks in such obvious ways? Well, exactly the type of doofus who is Caleb. His hackiness as a writer is a reflection of his hackiness as a moral agent —

Everyone here sits somewhere on the grifter spectrum, including the real people (Avi, doomed woman, repressed married couple) upon whom Caleb’s characters are based.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States