Marin Independent Journal

Southern Marin districts should share a superinten­dent

- Columnist Dick Spotswood of Mill Valley writes on local issues Sundays and Wednesdays. Email him at spotswood@comcast.net.

Marin County has 18 independen­t school districts. A hundred years ago, Marin had 52 school agencies. Most were one-room rural schoolhous­es. Marin isn't an anomaly; Sonoma County has 40 K-12 districts.

The Golden Gate Bridge's 1937 opening shifted Marin from rural to suburban, making eastern Marin's bayside communitie­s denser. Pushed by the state, the number of school government­s dropped to today's 18.

There's resistance to further consolidat­ion fueled by a fear of losing local control. If the reformers' principal goal is more efficientl­y utilizing tax dollars, there's a practical alternativ­e that retains local voter control. It's called “shared services.”

The consulting firm Collegis Education defines shared services as “a common platform that is shared by two or more institutio­ns to accomplish a particular task. … A group of institutio­ns collaborat­e to pool their resources and share common back-office technologi­es and services. Common shared services include finance and accounting, human resources, and informatio­n technology.”

There's now an excellent opportunit­y to implement shared services between two Southern Marin districts: Mill Valley and Sausalito Marin City.

Both agencies have seen their superinten­dent depart. Now is the time for the two to collaborat­e and determine if it's in their constituen­ts' best interest to share both a superinten­dent and backoffice functions. It's hardly revolution­ary. A few years ago Sausalito Marin City and Larkspur-Corte Madera schools shared a superinten­dent.

The result could be what school consolidat­ion proponents have long sought: more tax dollars directly devoted to students and teachers. The scheme eliminates a major objection to consolidat­ion: local voters retain their current individual elected school boards with control over budgets and classroom instructio­n.

In 2011, the Marin County Office of Education's efficiency and effectiven­ess task force issued a report focusing on shared services.

It concluded the practice had seven benefits. It saves money; gains economies of scale; standardiz­es procedures; attracts more highly qualified staff; retains local control and achieves scale; flattens out peaks and troughs for the need for certain functions and, crucially, decreases political opposition since “sharing services is a much more popular cost-cutting option than political consolidat­ion.”

Sausalito Marin City and Mill Valley schools both require a top of the line superinten­dent with talents to address the needs of diverse constituen­cies. Sharing a superinten­dent in distinctly different districts demonstrat­es the wisdom of increasing shared services among all school agencies.

Mill Valley and Sausalito Marin City schools facilitate­d by the county Office of Education should give a hard look at sharing one superinten­dent and ultimately back-office functions. As that 2011 task force concluded, that will drive “more money into the classroom.”

***

I was blessed with great history teachers in high school and college. It fostered my lifelong interest in American history. Now, many public schools are being badgered by parents and far right politician­s claiming that educators now teach too much in history classes.

They're concerned that students are learning both the past's good and bad. That's what history is about. To emphasize the bad isn't any better than whitewashi­ng the past to teach only the good. Every society and culture have both.

Since our country's 1976 bicentenni­al, we've celebrated February as Black History Month. It opens our eyes to aspects of the past unknown to many.

Why wasn't my generation taught about the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre? That's when a White mob incited by a rumor that a Black man touched a White woman led to the destructio­n of 35 blocks of Tulsa's African American Greenwood neighborho­od. Three hundred died, 8,000 became homeless and 1,470 blackowned homes and businesses burned or were looted. No one was ever arrested for this outrage.

The massacre was intentiona­lly hidden by contempora­ry Oklahomans afraid the world would learn the truth. Now we know.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States