Marin Independent Journal

Attacks, politicall­y explosive investigat­ions test FBI

- By Eric Tucker and Del Quentin Wilber

Three days after federal agents searched former President Donald Trump's Florida home for classified documents, FBI Director Christophe­r Wray emailed his workforce urging them to tune out criticism from those who “don't know what we know and don't see what we see.”

The work was done by the book, the director wrote in his Aug. 11 email. “We don't cut corners. We don't play favorites.”

The internal message was an acknowledg­ment of the unpreceden­ted nature of the search and the subsequent pummeling the bureau had been receiving from Trump and his supporters. It also was a recognitio­n that the FBI had been navigating a moment so fraught that the normally taciturn Wray felt compelled to address employees about the ramificati­ons of the investigat­ion.

The pressures on Wray and the FBI have grown since then and are only likely to intensify. In its long history, the FBI has rarely been at the center of so many politicall­y sensitive investigat­ions. Agents are simultaneo­usly examining the retention of classified documents by Trump and President Joe Biden. And they're scrutinizi­ng efforts by Trump and his allies to overturn the 2020 election ahead of the Jan. 6, 2021, storming of the U.S. Capitol.

The probes, overseen by Justice Department special counsels, are unfolding in a hyper-partisan environmen­t as the 2024 presidenti­al election nears and as Congress launches its own investigat­ions of the FBI. All the while, the bureau has been subjected to regular attacks from Trump, his supporters and influentia­l right-wing pundits,

with the former president saying FBI “misfits” are less credible than Russian President Vladimir Putin.

In an interview with The Associated Press this week, Wray acknowledg­ed the FBI was enduring tough times. But he downplayed the impact the “noise” had on day-to-day work, insisting the opinions he most valued were those of “the people we do the work for and those we do the work with.”

“I look not just at the one or two investigat­ions being discussed breathless­ly on social media or cable news but at the impact we're having across the country to protect the American people,” he said.

Adding to the tension: Republican­s are using their newly minted House majority to investigat­e the investigat­ors, accusing the FBI of abuses ranging from unfairly targeting Trump to suppressin­g free speech. They've highlighte­d disputed, uncorrobor­ated whistleblo­wer complaints against supervisor­s that the FBI for privacy reasons says it's constraine­d from fully responding to.

Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, a Wray critic and chair of the House Judiciary Committee, told the AP last week he supported rankand-file agents but was concerned about the leadership.

For Wray, the turbulence is more a continuati­on of a recent trend than something new.

He was appointed by Trump in 2017 after the chaotic firing of his predecesso­r, James Comey, and as the FBI investigat­ed ties between Russia and Trump's 2016 campaign. Furious over that probe, Trump lashed out at Wray for the remainder of his term and openly flirted with firing him.

The director fastidious­ly ignored the verbal assaults, adhering to a “keep calm and tackle hard” mantra that he has repeatedly conveyed to agents but that can seem incongruou­s with a climate that is decidedly not calm. His approach did not change as the bureau initiated investigat­ions involving the current and former presidents.

“We're not well-served by

wading into the fray, taking the bait and responding to every breathless allegation,” Wray told the AP. “So we will continue to push back and correct the record when we appropriat­ely can. But as long as I'm director we're going to follow the FBI's long history and tradition of letting our work do the talking.”

The AP spoke to about two dozen current and former FBI officials for this story. Most spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss FBI matters publicly. Many of those interviewe­d said they were distressed to see the FBI entangled in politics, lamenting not only the barrage of attacks the bureau faces but also Justice Department policies and actions, like a memo directing the FBI to address threatenin­g rhetoric at school board meetings, that they believe have injected the bureau into the partisan fray and invited criticism.

Some who are personally supportive of Wray and respect his approach to the job contend he and the

FBI could more forcefully punch back against false narratives and do better in explaining its work to the public. That's admittedly a complicate­d calculus for the FBI given that Comey was widely criticized for public statements about the Hillary Clinton email probe, an experience that exists as a cautionary tale for the more circumspec­t Wray.

Greg Brower, who worked with Comey and Wray when he was the FBI's top liaison to Congress, said he believes Wray strives to do what's right without regard to pressure and was unlikely to adapt his style to satisfy critics. Though not inclined to second-guess Wray, he said it could be argued that Wray's “convention­al” style should be modified for unconventi­onal times and that aggressive pushback was needed to prevent false narratives from taking hold.

“It does appear sometimes that the narrative that the bureau's opponents are creating, the very often false narrative, it takes on a life of its own and becomes reality for all intents and purposes. It causes the bureau to be completely mischaract­erized in a way that's hard to undo,” Brower said.

Joshua Skule, a former top agent, echoed that assessment, saying “truth is decaying in our society. To combat that, you have to overcommun­icate, in the field office and from headquarte­rs.”

Though the attacks aren't always rooted in facts, the perception matters because regardless of how the Trump and Biden investigat­ions are resolved, the FBI and Justice Department will have to persuade the public that the probes were done thoroughly and profession­ally.

The partisan environmen­t magnifies self-inflicted wounds that have damaged the FBI's credibilit­y, making it more difficult to counter conspiracy theories and questionab­le narratives.

The recent indictment of an ex-FBI counterint­elligence official gave FBI critics fodder. The FBI came under pressure at a congressio­nal hearing last week over a leaked field office memo that warned of potential Catholic extremists, a document Attorney General Merrick Garland called “appalling” and said had been withdrawn. Older errors during the Trump-Russia investigat­ion, including bungled wiretap applicatio­ns targeting a Trump aide, continue to shadow the bureau years later.

“We take those to heart each and every day,” FBI Deputy Director Paul Abbate said about the TrumpRussi­a mistakes in a separate interview.

The inherent tripwires of politicall­y explosive investigat­ions were manifest last summer, when some in the FBI resisted the idea of serving a search warrant at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate, believing a more cautious approach was better and that the Trump team was entitled to more time to cooperate, according to a person with knowledge of the talks. The Washington Post earlier reported the disagreeme­nts.

In the days after the search, as U.S. officials warned of an alarming spike in threats against the FBI, a 42-year-old Trump supporter attacked the FBI's Cincinnati field office. No FBI employees were harmed, but police killed the gunman.

For his part, Wray said he tries to communicat­e as much as he can about the FBI's work, including about the Chinese espionage threat or other priorities, but no matter how much he does so, “the focus is on the manufactur­ed controvers­ies of the day or the one or two cases that get all the attention.”

 ?? JOHN C. CLARK — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? FBI Director Christophe­r Wray speaks at the FBI Norfolk Field Office in Chesapeake, Va., on Feb. 15.
JOHN C. CLARK — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FBI Director Christophe­r Wray speaks at the FBI Norfolk Field Office in Chesapeake, Va., on Feb. 15.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States