Marin Independent Journal

Accompanyi­ng support crucial for Marin City

In approving controvers­ial plans for the renovation of Marin City's Golden Gate Village public housing apartments, county supervisor­s also promised to give its residents greater say in managing the 296unit complex.

-

The county board made its first move toward living up to that promise. It earmarked $2 million for an “empowermen­t” fund for Golden Gate Village's 650 residents.

Tapping into Marin's share of the American Rescue

Plan Act, the fund joins two other county appropriat­ions for Marin City, including $5 million toward the renovation and $4 million to open a county services hub in the community.

In November, the county Housing Authority board — a seven-member board on which the five supervisor­s serve — approved plans for the $170 million renovation of the 63-year-old complex.

While the board turned down a plan advanced by a tenants council, the plan it approved included a pledge to provide Golden Gate Village residents with more power in guiding the management of the complex and a commitment to invest in economic opportunit­y for tenants.

The complex was built for affordable housing for working-class households, most of whom were Black families who emigrated to the West Coast to work in wartime boatyards. Over its history, its population has been mostly low-income Black residents. Today, 63% are African American and 20% are Latino.

For many Golden Gate Village households, multiple generation­s have called the complex home.

Supervisor Stephanie Moulton-Peters, whose district includes Marin City, summed the intent of the “empowermen­t” fund: “The revitaliza­tion of GGV is more than the renovation of the buildings and grounds, it is also addressing past harms and inequities through the empowermen­t of residents with support from this fund.”

The Marin Community Foundation will administer the program. It is also seeking private contributi­ons to the community initiative.

The county's approval of the renovation plan and its creation of an “empowermen­t” fund addresses years of the county's failure to keep up with maintenanc­e needs of the complex and historical shortcomin­gs in addressing racial and economic inequities facing our county.

At the very least, this is a start — one that could help forge pathways for its residents. If approached with true active collaborat­ion with tenants, it could be enriching and healing.

Given the county's contributi­on, the public deserves to know how the funds are being spent. It should be accountabl­e in reporting the progress.

Potential goals for the fund include educationa­l opportunit­ies, job training, home ownership and wealth creation, according to county staff.

Given the size of Golden Gate Village — 650 residents — the county's funding may not go very far. But it is a start and the fund's beginning could attract other grants and contributi­ons.

Seeing county supervisor­s live up to their promise is encouragin­g. But being able to live up to the fund's promise is going to take more than cash.

The fund's progress in making a difference for Golden Gate Village households deserves to be watched and reported.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States