Marin Independent Journal

Women of color need universal health care across state

- By Indira D'Souza Indira D'Souza is the winner of the 2023 UC Davis Center for Poverty and Inequality Research Black History Month Student Essay Contest, from which this commentary was adapted. Distribute­d by CalMatters.org.

Addressing racial and economic inequality in California requires policies that improve the material circumstan­ces of those groups in our society who face the greatest hardship. One such group is women of color, and one such policy would be the introducti­on of universal health care coverage.

The experience­s of women of color are highly racialized and tied to the institutio­nal legacies of American slavery, Jim Crow and discrimina­tory social policies that limit their access to benefits and incarcerat­e them at higher rates.

Women of color are also subject to disparitie­s when it comes to health care. For example, infant mortality rates are highest for African-American women across all education levels. As annual pregnancy-related deaths increase across the U.S., it is low-income, minority women who face the highest maternal mortality rates.

Racialized and gendered health inequaliti­es require bold, creative policies designed to improve the socioecono­mic status of women in relation to men. Medicaid already covers 50% of births in the U.S., but Medicare only covers people aged 65 and older, and can be expanded at the state level to ensure that all births in California are covered by health insurance.

Accordingl­y, California­ns need a system of single-payer, universal health care coverage such as “Medicare for All.”

Countries with universal health care coverage, such as Canada and Britain, have significan­tly lower maternal mortality rates than the U.S. with 6.5 and 8.6 deaths per 100,000, respective­ly, compared to 17.4 in the U.S. Universal health care coverage would improve the health of infants and pregnant people by providing free maternity care to all California­ns pre- and post-birth.

Since a large share of maternal deaths occur in the postpartum period, the Medicare-for-all system could include incentives to train and license midwives and provide home visiting programs, two evidence-supported methods to improve outcomes for the pregnant person and the infant. Home visits are essential to assess social determinan­ts of health for families such as housing and food access, and to provide mental health support for new parents.

While the Affordable Care Act improved gendered health disparitie­s by requiring that insurance plans include contracept­ives and banning gender discrimina­tion for insurance premiums, Medicare for all builds on the ACA and Medicaid expansion to provide quality care regardless of socioecono­mic status.

Mirroring Sen. Elizabeth Warren's plan to provide federal universal coverage, an ideal route for California could begin with a public option. Under the Warren plan, children and families earning below 200% of the federal poverty line would be automatica­lly enrolled in the public option with no premiums or costsharin­g, and adults over 50 could opt into Medicare, significan­tly reducing rates of uninsuranc­e.

Continuing with Warren's public option proposal, those with employer-based insurance could opt into the public plan with mandatory employer contributi­ons and significan­t reductions in premiums (capped at 5% of income) and copays (capped at 10%). The public option would ensure greater bargaining power with pharmaceut­ical companies (helping to reduce drug prices), pay providers more to incentiviz­e participat­ion, and cover benefits such as prescripti­on drugs, dental and vision.

Thanks to reduced administra­tive and provider costs when compared to private insurance, Medicare for all would ultimately save money. Over five years, Warren's transition plan ensures that premiums and cost-sharing would be reduced to zero. This would create a state-level single-payer healthcare system that, like Bernie Sanders' proposal, will be funded through wealth, capital gains and income taxes directed at the wealthiest California­ns and Silicon Valley corporatio­ns. Private plans, which have been steadily increasing in cost for workers while covering fewer services, would be eliminated in favor of the state health plan.

The transition from a public option to a single-payer healthcare insurance would provide health care access for vulnerable communitie­s, increase competitio­n, drive costs and drug prices down, and reduce health disparitie­s for pregnant people.

Most importantl­y, it would help to alleviate disparitie­s in health care access faced by lowincome women of color. As such, Medicare for all would be an important step towards reducing racial and socioecono­mic inequality across California.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States