Marin Independent Journal

Electrical grid proposal raises questions

- By Susan Morgan Susan Morgan, of San Rafael, is founder and director of Indivisibl­e Marin. Online at indivisibl­emarin.org.

Concerns about power outages, the high cost of electricit­y and the importance of building a future for our state where we rely more on renewable energy than the dirty fossil fuels that are leading to catastroph­ic climate change are front of mind for many California­ns.

Those worries could be amplified by the proposed Assembly Bill 538, which is making its way through the state Assembly. Re-introduced this year by Southern California-based Assemblyme­mber Chris Holden, with support from deep-pocketed energy lobbyists, this bill would regionaliz­e California's electrical grid and dismantle the various state protection­s that were put into place 20 years ago after the Enron Corporatio­n defrauded California ratepayers of $40 billion in overcharge­s.

If passed, our state would cede control over our electricit­y system, and our transmissi­on line constructi­on, to the board of a western regional transmissi­on organizati­on (RTO) that would be serving the interests of utilities and energy traders from coal-burning states like Wyoming, Utah and Montana.

If California becomes a member of an RTO, it is a federally binding membership that would likely be impossible to leave.

An ad hoc coalition of advocacy and environmen­tal groups in Marin County has mobilized quickly to oppose AB 538, including 350 Bay Area Action, 350 Marin, Democracy Action Marin, Indivisibl­e Marin, Indivisibl­e

Ross Valley and Women's Energy Matters.

These groups are concerned that it will decimate our climate progress, while exporting thousands of jobs and millions of dollars in revenue to other states.

The California-based consumer watchdog group TURN (The Utility Reform Network), the California Building and Constructi­on Trades Council (representi­ng nearly half a million workers), and the Sierra Club have also expressed opposition, as they did when the bill was originally introduced by Holden in 2018. Additional­ly, Food and Water Watch, the Clean Coalition and many others opposing the bill in 2018 are signatorie­s to an opposition letter.

Thankfully, Marin's new Assemblyme­mber Damon Connolly has courageous­ly challenged this flawed bill. Through his participat­ion in an Assembly committee hearing in April, he secured a commitment from the author to stop moving the bill forward until the objections of consumers and labor and environmen­tal organizati­ons are addressed.

This is the highest form of responsibl­e legislatin­g: Stop a bad bill until either its flaws are corrected or the bill is abandoned. We applaud Connolly's wisdom and are grateful for his leadership on this important issue.

Still, work needs to be done to block passage of this bill until it is fixed, or altogether abandoned. At the Energy Committee meeting where Connolly played such a constructi­ve role, the bill ran into tough questionin­g by other legislator­s as well.

According to several experts advising our groups, the core issues have not yet been resolved by amendments Holden subsequent­ly proposed.

Unfortunat­ely, MCE (formerly known as Marin Clean Energy), which is Marin's community choice aggregator, is playing an unconstruc­tive role. Our coalition was recently surprised and disappoint­ed to learn that the management of MCE sent a public letter in support of this highly flawed bill.

MCE's position flies in the face of its stated mission “to confront the climate crisis by eliminatin­g fossil fuel greenhouse gas emissions, producing renewable energy, and creating equitable community benefits.”

We encourage Connolly to keep fighting the good fight against this wrong-headed legislatio­n.

We also encourage MCE to revisit its support of the bill and consider its many environmen­tally conscienti­ous consumers, like the members of our respective organizati­ons, who may be less inclined to patronize an organizati­on that does not prioritize the energy independen­ce and security of the electrical grid in the great state of California.

And we encourage all concerned citizens to call the offices of their elected officials to speak out against a bill that would put our energy future in the hands of coal-burning states.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States