Marin Independent Journal

Huffman remains evasive as Palestinia­n civilians die

- By Norman Solomon Author Norman Solomon, of West Marin, is national director of RootsActio­n.org and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. A former candidate for Congress, Solomon lost a primary election to Rep. Jared Huffman in 2012.

Reading social media posts and press releases from Rep. Jared Huffman, of San Rafael, is illuminati­ng.

The House member repeatedly and quite properly condemned the horrific killings of Israeli civilians on Oct. 7 by Hamas. He repeatedly and quite properly condemned antisemiti­sm. What he has not done is devote anywhere near the same amount of emphasis to condemning the horrific killings of Palestinia­n civilians in Gaza that have continued since that day.

This is particular­ly striking since Huffman has routinely joined with others in Congress to vote for supplying many billions of dollars' worth of weapons and ammunition to the Israeli military. It has persisted in killing Palestinia­n civilians — estimates say at least 19,000 of them since early October. The wherewitha­l is largely courtesy of appropriat­ions from Huffman and his congressio­nal colleagues.

A pattern of civilian carnage was soon obvious. By mid-November, five weeks into Israel's massive bombing of Gaza, the World Health Organizati­on's directorge­neral told the United Nations that the Israeli military was killing Palestinia­n children at an average rate of about six per hour. That amounts to about 1,000 kids each week.

One wonders whether members of Congress, now providing such easy rhetoric in public statements to justify huge and ongoing military support to Israel, would be so comfortabl­e with those appropriat­ions if they had to dig their own dead children out of rubble.

As a Jewish American, I know about antisemiti­sm. I grew up with the frightenin­g stories of storm troopers and concentrat­ion camps, where some of my relatives perished. I know full well that antisemiti­sm is a real problem. None of that justifies continuing to vote in the House of Representa­tives for massive military aid to Israel — aid that has been and is being used to slaughter civilians as innocent as ones you would see at a shopping mall in Corte Madera, San Rafael or Novato.

By mid-October, there was an opportunit­y for members of Congress to take a clear stand for a cease-fire. Eighteen Democrats in the House signed on as co-sponsors of the cease-fire resolution (House Resolution 786). But Huffman chose not to be among them and he is still not a cosponsor.

Instead, Huffman has basically supported President Joe Biden's policies toward the conflict. On Nov. 19, Huffman posted on social media that a cease-fire would require “Hamas releases all hostages, disarms & relinquish­es control of Gaza” -- in effect, first unconditio­nal surrender. While a letter to Biden that Huffman signed two days later urged “immediate cessation of hostilitie­s against targets with a civilian presence to facilitate the timely evacuation and protection of children and babies,” it notably did not call for a cease-fire.

In the White House and on Capitol Hill, ethnocentr­ic and racial biases have combined with geopolitic­al priorities and political expediency to enable U.S. government support of ongoing atrocities by the Israeli military. Huffman is a participan­t in this dynamic.

Congressma­n Huffman would better represent the decency of people in this congressio­nal district by actually supporting a single standard of human rights.

Unfortunat­ely, proclaimin­g opposition to antisemiti­sm sometimes serves as a smokescree­n for egregious and lethal double standards.

In early December, Huffman distanced himself — a bit — from the ridiculous and manipulati­ve conflation of the Israeli government with the religion of Judaism, writing in a tweet that “anti-Zionism is often antisemiti­sm, but not always.” Since many Jews are antiZionis­t, that should hardly be a revelation.

Yet, last month, Huffman touted his “long-standing opposition to BDS” — the effort to boycott, divest and sanction Israel — and he flatly called it a form of “antisemiti­sm.” Such labeling evades the fact that authoritat­ive human rights groups — including Amnesty Internatio­nal, Human Rights Watch and the Israeli organizati­on B'Tselem — have declared that Israel is an apartheid state.

It sounds as if Huffman is claiming that such nonviolent measures as boycotting Israel are antisemiti­c. That's absurd. Much as it would have been absurd to call such nonviolent measures that were aimed at South Africa's apartheid government “anti-White.”

Someday, hopefully, a member of Congress representi­ng Marin will have the minimal courage to apply a single standard of human rights to foreign policy.

Huffman would better represent the decency of people in this congressio­nal district by actually supporting a single standard of human rights.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States