Marin Independent Journal

Rail line cost could rise again

- By Gabriel Greschler

South Bay residents shocked by last fall's price jump for the San Jose BART extension — from $9.1 billion to $12.2 billion — may need to brace themselves again.

In a turn of events that could have major consequenc­es for an extension already struggling with exploding prices and timeline delays, an independen­t assessment set to be released this month from federal officials may peg the project's cost even higher than the agency's $12.2 billion estimate, the Valley Transporta­tion Authority's chief megaprojec­t officer said this week.

“I don't want to ever be sugarcoati­ng things for our (VTA board of directors),” said the agency's Tom Maguire. “I think there's a chance the number is over $12.2 billion, but I don't know how much higher.”

The forthcomin­g risk assessment, overseen by the Federal Transit Administra­tion, serves as a third-party study that shows a project's progressio­n and points out potential issues when local agencies request funding.

VTA is seeking to get about half the project covered by the FTA, with the rest paid by state dollars and local tax measures. Maguire and federal officials spent three days this month going over the BART plans — and the chief megaprojec­t officer said the continuing rise in constructi­on costs leads him to believe the total may increase.

If the FTA raises the price tag, it would be the fourth time local and federal agencies have increased estimates from the original 2014 projection of $4.7 billion.

In October, VTA announced its most recent cost jump and an expected completion date of 2036 — a decade later than originally expected. The announceme­nt sparked the VTA Board to create an oversight committee investigat­ing issues facing the project.

“I think if there is one common theme with the cost escalation, it is that the more time we wait to get a shovel in the ground, the more expensive it gets,” said Maguire. “We feel urgently with this — to answer for the voters who have been asking about this for 20 years. … I don't mean to poo-poo a billion dollars. But it only gets worse if we don't get started. And we are ready to get started.”

Members of the VTA's board said that while a further cost increase to the project could present funding difficulti­es, the importance of creating a “ring of transit” around the Bay Area is paramount.

The extension would create six miles of new track — including a subterrane­an tunnel underneath San Jose — looping BART service from the north part of the city to downtown and then up to Santa Clara at its Caltrain terminal.

“I think what the federal government is trying to make sure is that we're being conservati­ve as we can be when we're pricing projects,” said Santa Clara County Supervisor Cindy Chavez, who also serves on the extension's oversight group. “Because we want to be open and transparen­t with the public and also progress with the constructi­on.”

Palo Alto Councilmem­ber Pat Burt said that he doesn't expect the federal government's new number to be too much higher than $12.2 billion — but that any increase may present funding challenges.

“The FTA has treated this program as one of their top transit projects in the country,” he said. “They've repeatedly found it to be an important and worthwhile investment. And they're committed to it. However, we still have uncertaint­ies.”

The rising constructi­on costs track with what Ken Simonson is seeing.

The chief economist at the Associated General Contractor­s of America said the prices for materials necessary for transporta­tion projects, namely concrete, have jumped significan­tly — a unique trend that's continued during the pandemic.

In addition, electrical equipment such as switch gears and transforme­rs are experienci­ng “unpreceden­ted” delays, he said.

Simonson also attributes the rising prices to the national competitio­n to obtain materials and recruit transporta­tion expertise, as cities across the country aim to beef up their infrastruc­ture.

“The fact that so many agencies have been doing expansions and modernizat­ion (is) putting pressure on the same suppliers,” said Simonson.

That challenge is reflected in the federal government's most recent update this month on the BART extension, which states that they are “concerned” about two vacant positions for the project — program director and constructi­on director — blaming “high demand for transit profession­als in the U.S. and especially in the California market.”

The report states, “Due to frequent turnover and vacancies in key (BART San Jose extension) positions, (the Project Management Oversight Contractor) is concerned about the lack of succession planning and inadequate transition periods in dealing with attrition and turnover.”

Maguire said a “national recruitmen­t effort is underway, and we hope to have two directors on board by the middle of 2024.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States