Marin Independent Journal

Kurtenbach

-

There is only one thing that matters for the remainder of the season: beating the Lakers.

Yes, beat them on March 16 and April 9. But more importantl­y, make sure you're ahead of them in the standings when the regular season ends.

Perhaps in shooting for the Lakers, the Warriors can push for the No. 7 or No. 8 spot in the playin tournament. That stuff will take care of itself.

But all that matters is taking care of the team in purple. (I refuse to call it by its trademark name).

Is this lowering the bar that once used to be placed at the “title or bust” level?

Absolutely.

But it's also a realistic expectatio­n — a gettable goal in a season that feels, even at its peak, to be rudderless.

Barring catastroph­e, the Warriors will play postseason basketball. Going into Tuesday night's games, Golden State has a fivegame lead on the Jazz for the No. 10 seed and the final play-in tournament spot.

But the Dubs would need to win 16 of their final 22 games to reach 48 victories and reasonably expect to make the “real” playoffs with a top-six seed in the Western Conference.

I don't think the most ardent Dubs optimist sees that coming, even against the second-easiest schedule in the Western Conference down the stretch.

So the play-in tournament it is.

And, in all likelihood, given the Mavericks' current

play and the Kings' two-game lead on the Warriors, the Dubs will be in a one-game, 9-versus-10 showdown with the Lakers.

That sound you hear is NBA commission­er Adam Silver's drool hitting his desk in Manhattan.

While the Warriors' fate seems mightily close to being decided, where that one-game, win-or-go-home showdown will be played is still up in the air.

If the Warriors can achieve only one thing this season, they should ensure that game is in San Francisco.

Any accomplish­ment beyond that — be it a regularsea­son success or a playoff run — is gravy.

There are certainly worse coattails to ride than a great rivalry's.

Caring about one team and one team only for the remainder of the season is simple, elegant and might be exactly what the Dubs need — a narrowed focus.

While the Warriors and

Lakers have countless rivalries these days — such are the perks of success — they must acknowledg­e they have a special place of hate for each other. At least the fans in this part of the Golden State have it.

Rivalries are what makes sports great.

Comparison might be the thief of joy, but it's the lifeblood of these games we love.

And frankly, the NBA doesn't have enough true team rivalries.

No, instead, there are a million other sidequests happening, small and large: Jayson Tatum vs. true stardom, Luka Doncic vs. passing, Nikola Jokic vs. jumping and sweating, the Knicks vs. the modern game.

The Warriors and Lakers are no different. They have Steph vs. time, Draymond vs. his breathing exercises, Klay vs. his legs; LeBron vs. humility, D'Angelo Russell vs. the concept of defense, and

Anthony Davis vs. consistenc­y.

It makes for interestin­g ESPN fodder, seeing as the network long ago forgot that teams, not singular stars, play the games.

Wouldn't it be better to channel all that frivolous, angsty energy that defines the NBA today into a singular goal — beating a singular opponent in a singular game?

The Warriors have a chance to do just that.

And wouldn't it be better for the Dubs to exit this season with the possibilit­y of accomplish­ing something instead of failing to win everything?

Narrow the focus. Lower the bar. Then exceed it.

Just be better than the Lakers. It's a worthy and achievable endeavor.

And perhaps, in achieving that modest goal, the Warriors will achieve a bit more than expected this season.

 ?? STEVEN SENNE — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Warriors forward Jonathan Kuminga (00) grabs the ball in front of Boston Celtics guard Jaylen Brown (7) in the first half Sunday in Boston.
STEVEN SENNE — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Warriors forward Jonathan Kuminga (00) grabs the ball in front of Boston Celtics guard Jaylen Brown (7) in the first half Sunday in Boston.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States