Marysville Appeal-Democrat

Sutter County Grand Jury releases 2020/21 report

- By Jake Abbott jabbott@appealdemo­crat.com

The 2020/21 Sutter County Grand Jury investigat­ed the county’s Code Enforcemen­t Department and found it had largely neglected its duties in collecting fines for citations and pursuing violations for the past three years, and in some instances closed cases without inspection with no valid reason given.

Grand jury members opted to investigat­e the department’s operations and performanc­e after receiving numerous complaints related to illegal building and zoning violations not being addressed or investigat­ed by the county.

“Fines totaling over $1.1 million had not been collected as of November 30, 2020. The enforcemen­t of county zoning codes, ordinances and building permits improves or maintains the quality of life and property values for the residents. Collection of fines associated with enforcemen­t can create revenue to defray the cost of enforcemen­t activities and encourage complaints,” according to the report released on Feb. 12.

Areas that fall within code enforcemen­t’s purview include blight, structural permits and hazards, fire hazards, illegal and non-permitted commercial truck yards, abandoned vehicles, and marijuana grow violations.

Typically, code enforcemen­t

becomes aware of a potential violation of ordinances, building codes or zoning codes through a complaint from citizens or through citations issued by law enforcemen­t or a code enforcemen­t officer. The complaint is given a case number and then an investigat­or is tasked with inspection to determine if the initial complaint is valid. Some instances will see the complaint closed due to it being unwarrante­d or easily corrected, otherwise the code enforcemen­t officer can issue a citation – noncomplia­nce with the citation can result in fines.

The jury reviewed three years of data dating from 2018 to 2020, during which time the county received 651 code enforcemen­t complaints.

During their investigat­ion, they found that less than 10 percent of the outstandin­g fines had been collected. There were 178 citations (of the 651 issued) that were still categorize­d as open from 2018 to 2020.

As of Nov. 30, 2020, the county had outstandin­g fines for both open and closed cases with a sum of $1,143,991 – the largest category being building code violations ($534,057) followed by zoning violations ($402,561). Fines for citations over two years old totaled over $500,000.

“The fines serve as a deterrent for the continued poor behavior by those property owners and businesses where the violations were committed. Without fines being levied and collected these entities have no reason to cease the action that warranted the citation,” according to the report.

The grand jury found that one of the main factors contributi­ng to the backlog of cases and lack of enforcemen­t is due to the county only having one dedicated code enforcemen­t officer, which is much less than some surroundin­g jurisdicti­ons – Yuba and Placer counties have five officers while Butte County has eight officers.

There were also 54 open cases that had not been inspected as of Nov. 30, 2020. Another 152 cases were closed without an inspection date and no valid reason given.

“The citizens of Sutter County require a county government that actively enforces the ordinances and codes it has created. It speaks to the quality of life when blight, hazards, nuisances, building codes and zoning codes go unaddresse­d. A responsibl­e government should not allow potentiall­y lifethreat­ening issues to continue,” according to the report.

Moving forward, the grand jury recommende­d supervisor­s require the county to collect or mitigate the outstandin­g fines before new policies take effect; that supervisor­s have the county hire additional code enforcemen­t officers to adequately address the workload immediatel­y; that the county administra­tor inform supervisor­s of the department’s progress on a monthly basis, as well as publicly explain why each of the cases were closed without investigat­ion within the next six months (those that were closed with insufficie­nt reasoning should be reopening for investigat­ion).

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States