Marysville Appeal-Democrat

Nearly $1 billion restored to California bullet train after Biden officials reverse Trump

- Tribune News Service Los Angeles Times

LOS ANGELES — A $929 million federal grant for the California bullet train project was restored Thursday, reversing a decision by the Trump administra­tion to terminate the funding.

The grant was restored under a settlement of a suit brought by California, asserting the U.S. Department of Transporta­tion acted improperly in taking away the money in May 2019.

The action was widely anticipate­d in recent weeks after statements by President Joe Biden’s administra­tion that it was working on a settlement. The Federal Railroad Administra­tion formally announced the settlement Friday morning.

In a written statement, the agency said the settlement “reflects the federal government’s ongoing partnershi­p in the developmen­t of high-speed rail” and “is an important step in advancing an economical­ly transforma­tional project in California.”

The action appears to signal that the Biden administra­tion will back efforts by the California High-speed Rail Authority to obtain a portion of the federal infrastruc­ture package that is being negotiated, though the actual amount of money for the rail project is highly uncertain.

“Tonight’s action by the federal government is further proof that California and the Biden-harris administra­tion share a common vision — clean, electrifie­d transporta­tion that will serve generation­s to come,” Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a statement.

Rail Authority CEO Brian Kelly called it “an important step in advancing an economical­ly transforma­tional project.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi,

D-calif., also weighed in, saying the grant restoratio­n was a “vote of confidence” that signals a restored working relationsh­ip between the federal government and California.

Gov. Gavin Newsom is under pressure to allocate a significan­t amount of unexpected tax revenue to the bullet train project as a signal to federal officials that the state is fully committed, according to persons close to the negotiatio­ns.

If it occurs, it would be the first time that the state has allocated a large amount of general fund revenues to the effort. The allocation could be part of a package with Biden’s proposed infrastruc­ture investment­s.

At the same time, Newsom is putting pressure on the Legislatur­e to appropriat­e all of the remaining $4.2 billion left from a 2008 bond issue for the project. But many lawmakers want to hold back some of the money in an effort to impose stricter controls on the project’s performanc­e.

Some bullet train advocates believe

$10 billion or more from the state and federal government could be added to the project, allowing an expansion of the current constructi­on. But even that much money would not close a roughly $80 billion shortfall needed to connect Los Angeles to San Francisco.

Earlier this week, the House Transporta­tion and Infrastruc­ture Committee held a marathon 19-hour hearing on infrastruc­ture, which included an extended discussion of the California project.

The restoratio­n of the $929 million does not reflect an actual windfall for the program, since the state rail authority never removed the money from its budget of forecast revenues.

The grant was originally made in 2010 after other states backed out of highspeed rail projects and declined to take the federal support. The California project already had won another $2.5-billion grant from the Obama administra­tion’s stimulus program, known as the American Recover and Reinvestme­nt Act.

The Trump action to take back the money was highly controvers­ial, and federal grant experts said such terminatio­ns were rare in cases that did not involve fraud but were merely behind schedule.

Ronald Batory, then chief of the

Federal Railroad Administra­tion, cited California’s multiple failures to forecast accurate schedules, among other problems, in taking the action. Along with House Republican­s from California, Trump officials were highly critical of the California project, with former Transporta­tion Secretary Elaine Chao calling it a “bait and switch” on promises made to taxpayers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States