Lawmakers and Big Tech clash over the fate of self-driving semitrucks in California
California lawmakers are moving forward with plans to restrict the deployment of self-driving semitrucks — a move that industry representatives say is misguided.
“Rather than doing the responsible thing and waiting to see what a co-equal branch of government is doing, (legislators) are stepping in the middle and lighting a stick of dynamite,” said Jeff Farrah, executive director of the Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association.
California assembly members on Wednesday overwhelmingly voted to pass Assembly Bill 316, a proposal with bipartisan support to require a trained individual to sit behind the wheel of autonomous semitrucks and big rigs.
The legislation, which will need to pass the
Senate and get signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom before it becomes law, is part of a larger national conversation around the risks of automation and artificial intelligence. It is shaping up to become one of the marquee fights between lawmakers and technology companies this legislative session.
“Let’s face it. There are a lot of people in Big Tech lobbying against this bill, and you know they have the ear of the governor and his staff,” said the bill’s author, Assemblywoman
Cecilia Aguiar-curry, D-winters. “But we need to make sure that the roads are safe for the sake of our constituents and that jobs are safe for our truck drivers.”
As written, the bill essentially intervenes in a public rule-making process underway in the California Department of Motor Vehicles, which administers the state’s autonomous vehicles program and issues permits to manufacturers for testing and deployment.
Current state law, established by the DMV, allows testing and deployment of driverless light-duty autonomous vehicles that weigh 10,000 pounds or less — stopping short of allowing the same for long-haul trucks and big rigs with autonomous capabilities.
Aguiar-curry’s bill would not stop the DMV from permitting the testing of autonomous heavy-duty trucks but would mandate that the trucks always have a human operator.
Assemblywoman Laura Friedman, D-glendale, who voted in support, said she had “not been impressed” with the
DMV’S actions around autonomous vehicles up to this point.
“Unfortunately, the
DMV has failed to keep track of problems that are occurring right now with the autonomous vehicles that are on the road,” Friedman said, pointing to cars shutting down in the middle of streets and on transit tracks, or trying to flee police.
“The fact of the matter is, if a human was driving like some of these vehicles, they probably would have had their license suspended by now.”
Proponents of AB 316 include San Francisco Mayor London Breed and U.S. Representatives Barbara Lee, Katie
Porter and Adam
Schiff. The California
Labor Federation and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, which represents truck drivers across the state, were also integral to the crafting of the bill.
Supporters say the regulation would help protect people traveling on California roadways and support the livelihoods of truck drivers across the state.
“In our view, autonomous vehicles are a direct threat to good, middle-class jobs,” said Peter Finn, western region vice president for the Teamsters. “... The purpose of why these autonomous vehicles are being created and why big corporations want to use this technology is for one reason only — and that’s to cut their labor costs.”
Opponents of the legislation say it’s an overreach that fails to improve driving conditions on California roads.
Driverless semis are already on the roads in a handful of states, including Arkansas, Nevada and
Texas. The autonomous driving software company Aurora has partnered with Fedex to transport shipments between major metropolitan areas across Texas.
Mufaddal Ezzy, Aurora’s senior director of state public affairs, said the company takes safety seriously and its trucks operate almost exclusively on highways — largely avoiding urban congestion and pedestrian traffic.
Permitting the testing and deployment of autonomous trucks in California would help eliminate human errors, such as texting and driving and distraction, that contribute to traffic fatalities, Ezzy said.
“I think what’s oftentimes unfortunately lost in the debate is that this human-driven status quo is incredibly tragic and getting worse,” he said. “There’s an opportunity here for autonomous trucks to really help make an impact on that.”
Farrah, of the Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association, argues lawmakers are conflating autonomous driving technology with advanced driver assist technology. Driver assist technology, such as Tesla’s autopilot capabilities, require assistance from a human operator while autonomous vehicles function without any assistance. People in autonomous vehicles travel only as passengers.