Marysville Appeal-Democrat

Senate dispenses with Mayorkas impeachmen­t without a trial

- By Michael Macagnone Cq-roll Call

WASHINGTON

— The Senate voted Wednesday to dispense with impeachmen­t articles against Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas without a trial, in a show of procedural hardball from the Democratic caucus.

Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., who had said his party would quickly dispense of the impeachmen­t, made two procedural points of order that the articles did not meet the constituti­onal standard for impeachmen­t.

The Democratic caucus stuck together to back those, in 51-48-1 and

51-49 votes, which meant that the articles fell. Republican­s made procedural motions to halt that fate, but the Democratic caucus rejected them.

About three hours after the senators were sworn in as impeachmen­t jurors, the chamber had wiped out the articles and ended its time as the impeachmen­t court.

The procedural drama on the floor started right away. Schumer offered Republican­s a time agreement which would have allowed more than three hours of debate along with votes on several resolution­s.

Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-MO., objected and blocked that plan, and accused Democrats of “setting the Constituti­on ablaze” by voting to dispense with the articles without a trial.

That’s when Schumer made his first point of order. After a brief pause, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-texas, made a motion to take the

Senate into closed session.

Schumer was no longer interested. “In our previous consent request, we gave your side a chance for debate in public, where it should be, and your side objected. We are moving forward,” Schumer said.

The two impeachmen­t articles, accusing Mayorkas of “willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law” and “breach of public trust,” were the first effort to oust a sitting Cabinet secretary in more than a century.

Mayorkas’ tenure as Homeland Security secretary has made him a lightning rod for criticism amid the broader disputes between the Biden administra­tion and Republican­s over immigratio­n and border policy.

Senate Republican­s claimed Wednesday’s votes to avoid a trial damaged the institutio­n, as Democrats sought to ignore damage done by the Biden administra­tion’s immigratio­n policies.

Sen. Mike Lee, R-utah, one of the major advocates for the chamber to hold a trial, made a motion on the floor and pointed out that the second of the two articles included an allegation that Mayorkas lied to Congress, a felony.

“If this is not impeachabl­e, then what is?” Lee said.

Lee and Sen. Ron Johnson, R-wis., have threatened that Republican­s may withhold the unanimous consent usually required for the Senate floor to function in response to the votes.

After the votes, Schmitt told reporters the process “bulldozes 200 years of precedent and lights fire to our constituti­onal order,” echoing other Republican criticism of the vote.

Schumer called the Mayorkas impeachmen­t the “least legitimate, least substantiv­e and most politicize­d impeachmen­t trial ever” that was meant to boost former President Donald Trump’s reelection chances, in a floor speech Wednesday.

Sen. Christophe­r S. Murphy, D-conn., and other Democrats said the impeachmen­t articles offered by Republican­s were meritless and meant as a political ploy.

“This is merely an attempt to politicall­y damage the president. Everybody knows it. And it would be irresponsi­ble for us to treat it as a serious exercise of the impeachmen­t clause of the Constituti­on,” Murphy told reporters after the votes.

Murphy also said he felt like Republican complaints about the process or the precedent set by Democrats were overblown.

“It’s the Senate. A precedent lasts until it’s overturned,” Murphy said. “Ultimately, votes control in the Senate.”

Biden administra­tion spokesman Ian Sams praised the Senate vote to dispense with the impeachmen­t in a statement Wednesday.

“President Biden and Secretary Mayorkas will continue doing their jobs to keep America safe and pursue actual solutions at the border, and Congressio­nal Republican­s should join them, instead of wasting time on baseless political stunts while killing real bipartisan border security reforms,” the statement said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States