Miami Herald (Sunday)

‘Mega-traffic’? Hundreds of jobs? The truth about Miami Beach’s convention center hotel

- BY KYRA GURNEY kgurney@miamiheral­d.com

In the weeks leading up to the November election, Miami Beach residents have been flooded with mailers, text messages and TV ads for and against a proposed convention center hotel, which is on the ballot.

Mailers covered in images of traffic jams warn that the “mega-hotel” will back up traffic for miles. One ad includes a fake check and claims that taxpayers will be on the hook for millions if the project fails. Other mailers show pictures of smiling children and hotel workers and promise that the hotel will deliver hundreds of jobs and generate millions of dollars in revenue.

It’s enough to confuse even the savviest of voters. Although the hotel would be privately funded, the city needs approval from 60 percent of voters in order to lease public land in the convention center district.

And there’s a lot at stake. Tourism experts say that Miami Beach needs a hotel connected to its newly renovated convention center in order to compete with other cities. Two previous proposals failed to win public support in part due to concerns over traffic and the size of the hotel.

The newest proposal, created by Turnberry’s Jackie Soffer, Terra

Group’s David Martin, Miami Design District developer Craig Robins and architectu­re firm Arquitecto­nica, features a 185-foot tall, 800-room hotel connected to the Miami Beach convention center via a pedestrian bridge. The facade includes a 53-foot podium with two taller wings of hotel rooms stretching behind.

So what impact would the hotel actually have on Miami Beach? The Miami Herald fact-checked claims made by both sides and here’s what we found:

TRAFFIC

With numerous events held in Miami Beach and droves of tourists visiting every year, residents are sensitive to anything that could make the island’s traffic worse. Mailers warning of massive traffic jams in South Beach have likely scared more than a few voters.

Developers say that they have built in plenty of space for cars to queue on hotel property, however, rather than spilling into the street. Their plans include a three-lane pick-up and

drop-off system similar to an airport, including one lane dedicated to ridesharin­g services like Uber and Lyft. The parking garage would only be accessible from hotel grounds to keep cars from backing up on nearby streets as they wait to enter.

“We have prepared an excellent parking and traffic analysis with engineers to make sure we can contain all of that drop-off action inside the hotel and not spill into the streets of the city,” said Bernardo Fort-Brescia, co-founder of architectu­re firm Arquitecto­nica.

Constructi­on, which will take an estimated two years, won’t require any daytime lane closures and constructi­on workers will use a service road for cranes and equipment, Martin said.

As for the hotel’s longterm traffic impacts, Miami Beach staff believe it will ultimately reduce the amount of traffic generated by the convention center. Without a headquarte­r hotel, the convention center will attract consumer and trade shows whose attendees drive in from nearby areas, City Manager Jimmy Morales wrote in a memo to the City Commission, whereas with a hotel it would attract more conference­s and convention­s with out-of-town attendees who fly in and stay at the hotel, enabling them to walk to their meetings.

PARKING

Mailers against the convention center hotel claim that it would take up limited parking in South Beach. The proposed site for the hotel is a parking lot adjacent to the convention center with 160 public parking spots.

The 800-room hotel would include 320 on-site parking spaces, which Martin said is in keeping with the standard room-toparking spot ratio in the hospitalit­y industry. These spots would be open to the public as well as hotel guests.

Miami Beach has seen a 25 percent decrease in demand for public parking in recent years, a phenomenon the city attributes to a number of factors including the popularity of ride-sharing services.

FLOODING

Some mailers claim that the hotel would “reduce ground filtration, intensifyi­ng floods,” but the site is currently an asphalt parking lot where there is little, if any, ground filtration, according to city staff. The hotel would include water retention components, as well as other eco-friendly features such as solar panels, according to Walter Meyer, an urban designer who developed the hotel’s resiliency features.

The hotel’s roof would hold rainwater for up to 24 hours and cisterns would store the water for longer periods for use in irrigation, toilets and other parts of the hotel, said Meyer, the co-founder of Local Office Landscape Architectu­re. The hotel landscapin­g was also designed to absorb water, and planting areas would be set lower than nearby surfaces so that the plants could absorb water from the street.

“We’re going to reduce groundwate­r flooding because ... what we’re doing is increasing porosity,” Meyer said.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

Opponents of the proposed hotel claim that it risks taxpayer money because the public would “foot the bill if the project fails,” while supporters say the hotel would generate millions for the city.

The $362 million hotel would be entirely privately funded with no taxpayer subsidies. According to the terms of the lease agreement, the hotel would have to pay the city either fixed rent totaling $16.6 million over the first 10 years or a percentage of hotel revenue, whichever is greater. If the project fails and the mortgage lender fails to take responsibi­lity for the hotel, the lease stipulates that the property would be returned to the city. Taxpayers wouldn’t assume any of the risk for the project.

Financial projection­s from Miami Economic Associates, which were commission­ed by the developer, show that the hotel could generate up to $225 million in today’s dollars in lease payments and taxes for Miami Beach over the course of the 99-year lease.

Voters will get to decide how the money is used. One item on the ballot asks voters whether the guaranteed hotel rent payments should be earmarked in equal portions for traffic reduction measures, stormwater projects and education initiative­s. Otherwise, the money would go into the city’s general fund where it could be used for a broader range of expenses.

In addition to rent payments and taxes, Miami Beach estimates that the hotel will generate more than 700 full-time jobs and that constructi­on will generate approximat­ely 1,900 jobs.

Both city staff and the visitors bureau argue that the convention center needs a headquarte­r hotel in order to compete with other cities for convention­s. The convention center, which just underwent a $620 million renovation, has lost at least $130 million in bookings since 2015 because it lacks a headquarte­r hotel, according to the visitors bureau.

VIEWS

Mailers opposing the hotel claim that it would block views for nearly 200 feet. The hotel’s neighbors would include City Hall, the convention center and the New World Center as well as some apartments. A city spokeswoma­n said that “a very limited number of buildings and apartment units on Washington Avenue, one block away from the Hotel, would be partially impacted in terms of views.”

The hotel would be roughly 100 feet shorter than the previous proposal, however. Fort-Brescia said that the hotel’s design pushes the taller wings as far back from the street as possible in order to keep the front of the building consistent with the height of neighborin­g structures.

 ?? Miami Beach Connect ?? A rendering of the proposed Miami Beach Convention Center hotel, which is on the November ballot.
Miami Beach Connect A rendering of the proposed Miami Beach Convention Center hotel, which is on the November ballot.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States