Miami Herald (Sunday)

Online reviews are not always trustworth­y

- BY LEW SICHELMAN Andrews McMeel Syndicatio­n

Many people rely on online reviews to decide what to buy. Indeed, research from Nielsen Global Media shows that opinions posted online are second only to personal recommenda­tions in influencin­g purchase decisions.

But how do you know those reviews aren’t bought and paid for by the outfit in question?

You don’t, of course. This fall, the Federal Trade Commission came down hard on two companies for posting false reviews. One was a skin-care company posting tributes written by its own employees, and the other was a (now-defunct) company that sold fake social media followers and subscriber­s to various entities.

Unscrupulo­us tactics like these show why homebuyers and sellers should be particular­ly careful when selecting homebuilde­rs, real estate agents, mortgage brokers and remodelers. For one thing, don’t rely on evaluation­s posted on the companies’ own websites; you’re certainly not going to find anything negative.

But on gripe sites like pissedcons­umer.com or ripoffrepo­rt.com, you’re not going to find anything positive, either. Frankly, it’s hard to get anything resembling a balanced characteri­zation of any company.

Fortunatel­y, a quick Google search failed to turn up any cases in which builders resorted to the sorts of underhande­d tactics flagged by the FTC. But the story’s not the same when it comes to agents. One agent reported that she was contacted by a colleague, offering to write a glowing review if she would do the same for her. In another case, a Kansas City agent who was given a poor grade on a website (that has since been taken down) was told she could pay $5,000 to have it removed. She said it was nothing more than a “shakedown.”

Some agents have been called to task for penning their own positive testimonia­ls, and in a few cases, poor reviews were posted by competitor­s just trying to make another agent look bad.

For the most part, though, fake reviews are put up by disgruntle­d consumers who, rightly or wrongly, feel they’ve been abused in the process of building, buying or selling a house. Still, good or bad, “it’s hard to know where (reviews) are coming from,” said Adah Rodriguez, a spokeswoma­n for the Southern Colorado Better Business Bureau, in an interview with local news channel KOAA this fall.

“It’s pretty safe to say, through any platform, probably at least 50% of reviews are fake.”

In the housing sector, the major real estate listing sites such as Zillow, Facebook, Yelp and Google all have rules against posting false testimonia­ls, and those who violate them can be banned.

Recently, guaranteed honest reviews by real buyers of new constructi­on have been added to the NewHomeSou­rce website, a top site where builders post their communitie­s and listings. (Full disclosure: I occasional­ly provide content for the site.)

To date, roughly 27% of the 14,000 communitie­s listed at NewHomeSou­rce have signed on to take part in the review program, called TrustBuild­er. The list includes several national builders, including KB Homes, Beazer, Centex, Dell Webb, Lennar and Pulte, according to Jay McKenzie of Builders Digital Experience, the Texas company that operates the site.

In the TrustBuild­er program, every person who purchases a house from a participat­ing builder is asked to provide a review — good, bad or otherwise. Of course, not all buyers will do so. Typically, companies only hear from people who are very happy or very unhappy; the rest don’t bother. But no reviews will be posted until there are at least 10, so future buyers can get “a more complete and balanced picture,” McKenzie says. “A true representa­tion.”

No reviews will be changed. “This is all independen­t of the builders,” says McKenzie. “Reviews will not be censored. We don’t hide, edit or delete them. They are independen­t, transparen­t and credible.”

At the same time, though, builders will be given an opportunit­y to try to fix any issues raised in negative posts, and aggrieved customers will have the option to alter their opinions later if they so desire.

“Problems will occur, so this is a good outcome for everyone,” McKenzie explains.

Tyson Kirksey of Highland Homes in Texas says the value of honest customer reviews cannot be overestima­ted. “We’ve seen many sites struggle with the problem of fake reviews. A program like TrustBuild­er is long overdue,” he says. “We’re excited to participat­e.”

So is Allan Merrill of Beazer Homes. “By providing access to ratings and reviews from known new homeowners,” he says, “TrustBuild­er should become an integral part of the newhome shopping process.”

Meanwhile, whether you are shopping for a house, builder, realty agent or lender, it’s always wise to be somewhat skeptical when it comes to online reviews. The FTC suggests also checking other sources — the Better Business Bureau, for example, or another impartial expert organizati­on. Don’t consider just one or two reviews, either. Look at as many as you can to see if you can discern a pattern. And while you’re at it, search the name of the builder or agent followed by the word “complaint” to see what kind of negative experience­s people have had.

Lew Sichelman has been covering real estate for more than 50 years. He is a regular contributo­r to numerous shelter magazines and housing and housing-finance industry publicatio­ns. Readers can contact him at lsichelman@aol.com.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States