Miami Herald (Sunday)

Legislator­s remain silent about repairing Florida’s tarnished redistrict­ing process

- BY MARY ELLEN KLAS meklas@miamiheral­d.com Herald/Times Tallahasse­e Bureau

TALLAHASSE­E

When Florida legislator­s launch the once-a-decade redrawing of state legislativ­e and congressio­nal district boundaries this week, they will face new obstacles that include a compressed schedule because of a delay in the census process and restoring public trust after a court’s conclusion that the last process was secretly and illegally “hijacked” by Republican political operatives 10 years ago.

But despite the hurdles, Florida GOP leaders have held no public hearings, will give no media interviews, and have not responded to requests from voters’ groups that they conduct a transparen­t process devoid of influence from secretive political operators.

For the Fair Districts Coalition, a group of nonpartisa­n advocates that won voter approval for the Fair Districts amendments that require legislator­s to draw maps that do not favor incumbents or political parties, the Legislatur­e’s approach falls short.

“This is a very disappoint­ing start,’’ said Ellen Freidin, CEO of FairDistri­cts NOW, a member of the coalition, whose partners include Common Cause Florida, League of Women Voters of Florida, Florida Rising, UnidosUS and Florida Conservati­on Voters.

““I think they’re being told not to talk to anybody because basically, what the leaders are saying to the members is: Anything you say can be used in a court of law,’’ she said. “But if they were following the law, there’s not going to be any use for it. In other words, if they say things that are consistent with the Fair Districts amendments, then how could that be used against them?”

Under state and federal law, legislator­s must update the congressio­nal and legislativ­e political boundaries every 10 years to reflect the changes in population to make sure that all citizens are fairly and equally represente­d. But because of delays brought on by the pandemic, the release of the official Census data was delayed, compressin­g the time lawmakers now have to do the work when they meet in regular session in January.

In addition, legislator­s must overcome the black eye they received 10 years ago, when they attempted to circumvent the Fair District amendments to the state Constituti­on. When the maps were challenged by the League of Women Voters and a coalition of voters groups, the courts rejected multiple versions of the GOP-led Legislatur­e’s congressio­nal and state Senate maps, turning to third parties to draw the maps now currently in place.

“The House deeply understand­s the large responsibi­lity ahead of us, and we are committed to ensuring that the entirety of this process will follow all state and federal law,’’ said Rep. Tom Leek, ROrmond Beach. and chair of the House Redistrict­ing Committee, in a statement through a spokespers­on on Tuesday.

The House plans its first meeting Wednesday, Sept. 22, with congressio­nal and legislativ­e subcommitt­ees to follow the next day. Leek’s statement said that during interim committee weeks that take place before the January legislativ­e session, “we will educate members about the redistrict­ing process, review available materials for constituen­ts, and train members on the map drawing software, among other things.”

The Senate schedule suggests that its regularly scheduled committee hearings in September, October and November will also serve as “public hearings.”

“It does not seem that it would be appropriat­e for the chair and [subcommitt­ee chairs] to get out ahead of a noticed meeting,’’ wrote Katie Betta, Senate deputy chief of staff, in response to the Herald/ Times requests for interviews ahead of the Senate Redistrict­ing Committee Meeting scheduled for Monday, Sept. 20.

“We are happy to provide you the following informatio­nal presentati­ons that may be helpful,’’ she wrote, and attached links to prepared documents on the Senate’s incomplete redistrict­ing timeline, a selective overview of the redistrict­ing process, the role of the 2020 Census and a collection of historical maps. “These were developed for Senators to use in communicat­ing with constituen­ts and other groups about redistrict­ing.”

COALITION ASKS LEGISLATOR­S TO KEEP PROCESS OPEN

In a letter to legislator­s, the coalition asked them to pledge to support transparen­cy in the redistrict­ing process, stream map-drawing online in real time so the public can watch the process — as a court ordered North Carolina legislator­s to do in 2019 — create opportunit­ies for the public to provide input before maps are drawn, and allow public comment on draft maps after they are presented.

The coalition also asked that “all records including draft maps” be retained and that members be instructed to “not destroy any documents that relate to redistrict­ing.” In 2012, when the Supreme Court ordered the Legislatur­e to release all its redistrict­ingrelated documents, the Legislatur­e had destroyed it all, except a handful of draft maps.

“Now it is your turn to show the state and our country that Florida legislator­s actually respect our Constituti­on and are willing to put it ahead of their personal or partisan wish lists,’’ the coalition wrote to legislator­s. “The pressure will be great for you to succumb to partisan demands. But, in order to restore public trust, we implore all of you to put the people of Florida first and scrupulous­ly follow the Fair Districts Amendments.”

They pointed to the botched handling of the redistrict­ing process in 2012, when Don Gaetz, then Senate president, proclaimed the redistrict­ing process was “the most open, transparen­t and interactiv­e process in Florida history” at the same time he and other legislativ­e leaders were engaged in a shadow process that allowed political consultant­s to draw maps and secretly share them with legislativ­e staff.

WHAT HAPPENED LAST TIME

GOP political consultant Frank Terraferma and other political operatives testified how proposed maps with shadowy names such as “Sputnik,” “Schmedloff” and “Frankenste­in” were created and then secretly shared during the months legislativ­e staff was also drawing maps.

And for the first time in state history, sitting legislator­s were called to testify in a pending court case. They admitted to routinely deleting redistrict­ing records. Phone records of a House speaker and his right-hand man, sought for more than a year, were never produced. And legislativ­e leaders acknowledg­ed they met secretly with their staff and political operatives to discuss strategy.

The maps drawn by political consultant­s closely mirrored those submitted under the name of a former Florida State University student who denied being associated with the redistrict­ing process. Plaintiffs argued that was proof that GOP consultant­s had orchestrat­ed a “shadow” system to infiltrate the redistrict­ing process.

Although the House map was not challenged and was approved by the Florida Supreme Court, House leaders ultimately were implicated in the shadow map-drawing scheme. Kirk Pepper, the former deputy chief of staff to former House Speaker Dean Cannon, admitted in court that he made a mistake by secretly feeding redistrict­ing plans to a Republican political consultant in 2012.

Leon County Circuit Court Judge Terry Lewis concluded that political operatives had worked to “hijack” the state’s redistrict­ing process and tainted the congressio­nal map with “improper partisan intent.”

YEARS OF COURT CASES WITH A DAMNING OUTCOME

After four years of litigation, the Florida Supreme Court adopted maps that are so competitiv­e that both the state Senate and the congressio­nal delegation saw shifts in the partisan balance after the 2016, 2018 and 2020 election cycles.

“As a result of all the litigation, the Legislatur­e was proven to have acted intentiona­lly to violate the Constituti­on. They lost public trust and it’s pretty clear that people don’t trust them to do the right thing,’’ Freidin said Tuesday. “There’s only one way, in my view, for them to earn that trust back and that is to conduct this process transparen­tly.”

There are some signs that House and Senate leaders are being cautious about their legal liability. In a Sept. 3 email to senators, Senate President Simpson wrote:

“Senators should continue to take care to insulate themselves from interests that may intentiona­lly or unintentio­nally attempt to influence the redistrict­ing process inappropri­ately. Senators and staff should also be mindful that correspond­ence, including electronic communicat­ions related to the enactment of new districts, whether sent or received on official Senate accounts or devices or personal email accounts or devices, may be of permanent or archival value and those records should be preserved accordingl­y.”

Rep. Joe Geller, an Aventura Democrat who was appointed Tuesday to serve as ranking Democrat on the House Redistrict­ing Committee, said his goal is to make sure the committee is focused on “transparen­cy, public input, a fair process that allows everyone access to the technology” and “a process of fairness and a result of fairness that reflects where this state is politicall­y and the closeness of divisions.”

“The product is the ultimate way to restore trust and enact something that’s fair,’’ he said.

Florida’s redistrict­ing process has been pummeled by legal challenges for the last 40 years, starting when Democrats controlled the Legislatur­e in 1992 to 2012, when courts rejected the maps and allowed legislator­s to run in outdated districts in

2012 and 2014 as the lawsuits moved through the court system.

During those years, however, legislativ­e leaders did not shy away from answering reporters’ questions about their vision for moving forward, how they planned to avoid the legal pitfalls of the past, and what the timeline looked like.

Before the House or Senate released their maps in November 2011, for example, then-Rep. John Legg, co-chairman of the House subcommitt­ee on congressio­nal redistrict­ing, said in an interview with the Miami Herald that the issue of retrogress­ion, the reduction in voting strength of a racial or ethnic minority based on a redistrict­ing plan, was “going to be a paradigm issue we have to look at.’‘

Ten years earlier, in March 2001, then-Sen. Daniel Webster, R-Orlando, and the chairman of the Senate Reapportio­nment Committee, told the Palm Beach Post that Republican­s who believe they can draw a plan that guarantees they wouldn’t lose seats in the House and Senate were mistaken. “I don’t think you could have a plan that could guarantee that for either side,” he said.

This year, the Fair Districts Coalition asked all 160 legislator­s to sign a pledge to to keep the redistrict­ing process transparen­t. Only 19 lawmakers, all Democrats, signed it.

Mary Ellen Klas : Mary Ellen Klas

Mary Ellen Klas can be reached at meklas@miamiheral­d.com and @MaryEllenK­las

 ?? PHIL SEARS AP ?? In the last redistrict­ing, Senate Reapportio­nment Chairman Sen. Bill Galvano, R-Bradenton, discusses an amendment in the Senate in August 2014. Behind him are maps of the 2012 Florida congressio­nal districts, left, and redrawn districts he proposed.
PHIL SEARS AP In the last redistrict­ing, Senate Reapportio­nment Chairman Sen. Bill Galvano, R-Bradenton, discusses an amendment in the Senate in August 2014. Behind him are maps of the 2012 Florida congressio­nal districts, left, and redrawn districts he proposed.
 ?? MATIAS J. OCNER mocner@miamiheral­d.com ?? People wait in line to vote at the John F. Kennedy Library in Hialeah during the general election on November 3, 2020.
MATIAS J. OCNER mocner@miamiheral­d.com People wait in line to vote at the John F. Kennedy Library in Hialeah during the general election on November 3, 2020.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States