Miami Herald (Sunday)

Banning books is banning truths

-

Roughly a decade ago, Alexandria Martin, an English teacher at Miami Carol City Senior High, assigned a book to her class with a provocativ­e title — the n-word, spelled out — that discussed the origins and ramificati­ons of the racial slur.

The point was to challenge her students: “If [a book] is triggering to people... that’s actually normal,” she told the Herald Editorial Board.

She felt support from her school administra­tion, but, today, she said teachers might not feel as comfortabl­e to assign certain books.

“I think it’s because of all the scrutiny schools are under,” Martin said.

Teachers are under the microscope of standardiz­ed tests and school grades. But now there’s new meddling in classrooms — and school libraries. Attempts to ban books from K-12 schools are rising across the nation, according to the American Library Associatio­n. Usually behind these efforts are conservati­ve groups that say they want to protect children from pornograph­y and sexually explicit content, as well as material that might make students feel “uncomforta­ble” because of their race or gender.

The point appears to be to sanitize history and the country’s relationsh­ip with race and racism.

ERADING HISTORY

Even a book titled “Martin Luther King Jr and the March on Washington” came under fire from a Tennessee chapter of Moms for Liberty for being “Anti-American, Anti-White, and Anti-Mexican.” That chapter of the group — which started in Florida — had an issue with images of segregated water fountains and Black children being blasted with water by firefighte­rs, according to Insider.

Whose sensitivit­ies are being so threatened that the only resolution is this figurative book burning? A list of 850 books compiled by a Texas Republican lawmaker offers more insight.

The list covers titles that “might make students feel discomfort, guilt, anguish or any other form of psychologi­cal distress because of their race or sex,” Texas Rep. Matt Krause said, according to Houston Public Media.

The books include: “How to Be an Antiracist;” “Black Lives Matter: From Hashtag to the Streets;” “LGBT Families” and “The Birds, the Bees, and You and Me,” a young adult novel about a teen who begins dolling out sex advice to schoolmate­s in the girls’ restroom.

In sum, lots of books about race, the LGBTQ community and — what a shocker — sex.

Lots of Black and LGBTQ authors.

Lots of books that purportedl­y make white, straight kids — or, more to the point, their parents — “feel discomfort.”

In Florida, Moms for Liberty led the charge against COVID mask mandates and now has branched out to book monitoring. The group’s Indian River County chapter, for example, has released a list of titles that “contained pornograph­ic and/or sexual content.”

There are depictions of sex in those books. For example, “Looking for Alaska,” a comingof-age novel about a teenage boy’s experience at a boarding school, has a detailed descriptio­n of oral sex, though the book isn’t only about sex.

Is this appropriat­e for students of any age? No. The book is recommend for 14 and up on some websites and 16 and up on others. It’s understand­able that some parents might not want it available to younger students at school libraries.

WHAT’S THE RIGHT AGE?

“I think academic freedom needs to be balanced with a sense of what’s age appropriat­e,” Miami-Dade County School Board Vice Chair Steve Gallon told the Editorial Board.

Where do you draw the line on what’s appropriat­e and decide whose definition of appropriat­eness should prevail? What happens when “pornograph­ic and/or sexual content” or “discomfort” are simply a guise to ban anything that offends a small group of vocal parents?

The Moms for Liberty Indian River chapter has other books it wants to ban, according Treasure Coast Newspapers: Ibram X. Kendi’s “How to be an Antiracist,” which proposes ways people can fight systemic racism, and Kendi’s picture book for children, “Antiracist Baby.” Moms for Liberty said the latter is, “Completely CRT (critical race theory), racist and unacceptab­le for children.”

CRT is an academic theory taught mostly in law schools that says racism is embedded in American institutio­ns. It is the new scapegoat for conservati­ves who don’t want their children exposed to discussion­s about racism. Gov. Ron DeSantis banned the theory from K-12.

Critical race theory, books and white parents clutching their pearls are a political gold mine for the Republican Party. That’s why these efforts to “protect” students from harmful content aren’t just about parental control.

This is about narrative control and who gets to tell their version of American history. The GOP-preferred version excludes voices and erases the experience­s of a large share of Americans.

‘‘ MY DAUGHTER ASKED ME HOW TO BEGIN HER LETTER TO SANTA CLAUS, SO I SUGGESTED SHE START WITH, “HEAR ME OUT …”

 ?? ??
 ?? CATHERINE DELAHAYE Getty Images ?? Many conservtiv­e white parents are driving a move to ban books on race from schools.
CATHERINE DELAHAYE Getty Images Many conservtiv­e white parents are driving a move to ban books on race from schools.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States