‘Ever Green’ a plea to preserve the megaforests
When asked about a proposed Redwood National Park in 1966, Ronald Reagan, then running for governor of California, said, “A tree is a tree, how many more do you need to look at?”
The quote appears in “Ever Green: Saving Big Forests to Save the Planet,” by John W. Reid, an economist and conservationist, and Thomas E. Lovejoy, a renowned tropical-forest ecologist who died in December.
The authors offer an eloquent and fact-filled refutation to the Reagans of the world who see untamed nature as a blank space on the map that cries out to be developed for human uses. They detail why forests are a critical life-support system for the Earth, moderating temperatures, storing carbon, preserving watersheds and generating “flying rivers,” moisture-laden currents of air that bring life-giving rains to regions both near and far away.
The good news is that five almost unimaginably vast megaforests remain largely intact: the Amazon, the North American boreal zone, the Taiga of Russia and far northern Europe, the island of New Guinea, and the Congo Basin. They are the Earth’s greatest depositories of biodiversity, where evolution continues to this day and untold thousands of species are yet to be discovered.
You don’t really know what a megaforest is until you’ve had the experience of flying over one, as I did during a reporting trip to the Amazon in 2015. For more than an hour in the middle of a flight from Brasilia to Manaus, the largest city in the Amazon basin, I saw virtually no roads or towns — only an ocean of green striped by oxbowing rivers and stretching from horizon to horizon. I could scarcely believe my eyes.
Since that flight seven years ago, Brazil alone has lost tens of thousands of square miles to forest cutting and the massive fires that have followed human incursions. The authors write that we are moving perilously close to a point of no return when losses in Amazonia may trigger an unstoppable transition of the entire ecosystem to a drier, savanna-like landscape.
The prospects are a bit less dire in the other great forests, where population pressures are not so acute. But all of them face threats from logging and road-building as well as from climate change, which will make it difficult for many highly adapted species to continue living where they are now.
Perhaps the most compelling argument for preserving forests intact is that they are the planet’s first line of defense against global warming.
Big forests “metabolize the carbon” that our industrial civilization spews into the air. The boreal forests in the Arctic and the Congo rainforest also safeguard, just below the surface, huge deposits of peat, the largest storehouse of carbon on the planet. Trees also shade the Earth, and their leaves transpire, cooling whole regions of the planet in much the same way that sweating prevents our bodies from overheating.
Moreover, maintaining forests is far cheaper than implementing technology-intensive schemes for lowering the temperature, such as carbon capture, or weaning ourselves off fossil fuels. “Keeping carbon in tropical forests costs a fifth as much as reducing emissions from energy and industry in the United States or Europe,” the authors report.
They are not arguing against reducing emissions. But, they say, “the math of keeping our world livable doesn’t add up” without preserving megaforests, which exercise a critical stabilizing influence on global climate.
To their credit, Reid and Lovejoy don’t limit themselves to making these utilitarian arguments for forest preservation. They intersperse the science with accounts of what forests have traditionally meant to the peoples who live in them.
When they asked their tribal informants what they wanted to say to the readers of the book, Reid and Lovejoy expected to hear warnings about climate change, streams drying up or the loss of permafrost. Instead, the most common message was an invitation: “Tell them to come!”
I suspect they were motivated by the faith that once we saw their magnificent forest up close, we’d grow to love it, too.
That was clearly the case for the authors of this book. “Ever Green,” for all its scholarly precision, is ultimately an impassioned plea to save the world’s last great wild places by two men who had come, through long professional acquaintance, to love them.