Miami Herald (Sunday)

A peek at Democratic politics, through the eyes of Biden, Obama

- BY EMILY TAMKIN Special to The Washington Post

From its first pages, Gabriel Debenedett­i’s “The Long Alliance: The Imperfect Union of Joe Biden and Barack Obama” makes clear its ideal reader. Political obsessives — especially those who closely observe Democratic Party politician­s and operatives, eager to pull back the curtain and peek into their conversati­ons and debates — are in for a treat.

Debenedett­i, national correspond­ent at New

York magazine, has written a colorful, highly detailed and scenic account of the last two decades of American politics, and specifical­ly of the last two decades of American politics as experience­d by Biden and Obama, together and apart. The first chapter details both men’s experience­s during thenSen. John F. Kerry’s presidenti­al campaign, with a particular focus on the 2004 Democratic National Convention where Obama delivered the speech that catapulted him to political stardom. By the afterword, he’s led us through the first year of the Biden administra­tion.

In between, we get their rocky start, with Biden’s less-than-glowing perception of Obama after a “sour” meeting in which the latter assured the former that he could afford a fancy dinner (and Obama’s offense that Biden didn’t think he could). We get the fallout from, and cleanup following, Biden referring to Obama as “the first mainstream African American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy” early in their 2008 presidenti­al campaigns, and Obama’s selection of Biden as his running mate. We watch as their different styles play out in Obama’s first term, and read one extremely amusing anecdote in which Biden proves his loyalty to Obama by yelling at thenRep. Anthony Weiner.

Part I ends with Obama’s 2012 campaign against Mitt Romney, and in particular with Biden’s debate against Romney’s running mate, Paul D. Ryan, in which Biden dismissed, belittled and otherwise laughed off Ryan for the better part of 90 minutes. “The reaction in Chicago was almost unanimous delight, and Obama, who watched on Air Force One on the way back to DC after a day of campaignin­g in Florida, exhaled,” Debenedett­i writes. “Biden had reset Obama’s way of thinking about the rest of his showdowns with Romney, the president said.”

Part II takes us through to the present, dwelling on low points in the relationsh­ip as Obama hinted at his support for Hillary Clinton to run in 2016, even though Biden (per Debenedett­i) felt himself to be Obama’s more natural heir and to have a better understand­ing of the populist way the political winds were blowing. (We also glimpse Obama unconvince­d that Biden is the right candidate heading into 2020.) And we witness high points, such as Biden leaning on Obama leading up to and after the passing of his son Beau.

Throughout, the story is told in detailed, colorful scenes. Here’s Jill Biden walking in, wearing a bikini with the word “no” written on her stomach to stop Biden from running for president in 2004; there’s Ron Klain, now White House chief of staff, pumping Biden up before the Ryan debate; there’s Obama calling Biden ahead of a crucial 2020 Democratic primary debate, advising him to “go out there and be president.”

It is all the more remarkable that the book is as descriptiv­e, alive and scene-driven as it is given that, as Debenedett­i shares in his note on sources, neither Biden nor Obama sat for an interview for the book. Despite that, he manages to paint full portraits of both men. It is perhaps a reflection of their different personalit­ies that Debenedett­i’s rendering of charismati­c Obama crackles and pops more than his descriptio­ns of Biden, who neverthele­ss comes off as perhaps the more sympatheti­c of the two, a loyal, ambitious, intelligen­t, gaffeprone creature of Washington and middle-class America.

Whether readers find this book satisfying will depend on what they are looking for. Those whose eyes glaze over at names like David Axelrod, Austan Goolsbee, Valerie Jarrett and Ted Kaufman, or who follow only the broad contours of American politics, may find themselves overwhelme­d with the sheer quantity of detail — of names, dates, meetings and conversati­ons in the halls of power in Washington and across America. And readers looking for a deeper analysis of the way we live and conduct politics now will not find it here. “The Long Alliance” does not explore in depth, for example, whether or how the period of Democratic politics it covers paved the way for Donald Trump’s presidency. Further, politics in this book sometimes seems to exist first as a way to win elections, not to improve the lives of people.

There are some passing paragraphs that invite reflection. In the chapter titled “2008-2009,” Obama, Biden and company are surprised to learn how few congressio­nal Republican­s are willing to work with them to save the nation, a realizatio­n that now seems downright quaint; in the chapter “2009-2010,” we learn that nobody in the White House took the radical right-wing tea party movement and its falsehoods about Obama’s health-care plan especially seriously at first, because “no serious Republican­s were talking about this stuff.”

 ?? HENRY HOLT Handout ??
HENRY HOLT Handout

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States