Miami Herald

DEADLY DESIGN

Feds blame FIU, state, contractor­s for disaster

- BY ALEX DAUGHERTY, NICHOLAS NEHAMAS, ANDRES VIGLUCCI AND MONIQUE O. MADAN adaugherty@mcclatchyd­c.com nnehamas@miamiheral­d.com aviglucci@miamiheral­d.com mmadan@miamiheral­d.com

‘‘ THE CRACKS WERE ‘SCREAMING THAT THERE WAS SOMETHING DEFINITELY WRONG WITH THIS BRIDGE AND YET NO ONE WAS LISTENING.’

National Transporta­tion Safety Board Chairman Robert Sumwalt

Nineteen months after the collapse of the Florida Internatio­nal University bridge, the National Transporta­tion Safety Board was told that everyone from engineers to the state failed to respond to gaping cracks in the 950-ton structure.

During a hearing Tuesday on last year’s deadly Florida Internatio­nal University pedestrian footbridge collapse, the National Transporta­tion Safety Board concluded that the bridge’s “catastroph­ic failure” stemmed from a flawed design with “significan­t errors.”

All of the major parties involved in the project — from the university to the Florida Department of Transporta­tion and the project’s engineers and contractor­s — came in for harsh criticism during the public hearing, something they have largely avoided as the NTSB conducted a closed-doors investigat­ion over the past 19 months while victims and their families demanded answers.

The NTSB determined that

FIU, FDOT, as well as the project’s design-build team and inspectors failed to exercise independen­t judgment, or even common sense, in leaving the busy road underneath the bridge open while a constructi­on crew performed emergency work. Six people died on March 15, 2018, when the 950-ton span collapsed onto cars idling on Tamiami Trail. Ten people were injured.

Before the collapse, “abnormal” cracks had been growing and spreading throughout a crucial support junction at the span’s north end, left critically weakened by a major design error, NTSB investigat­ors told the board at a hearing in Washington, D.C. But no one acted to close down the road.

The cracks were “screaming that there was something definitely wrong with this bridge and yet no one was listening,” said NTSB Chairman Robert Sumwalt.

The unique concrete truss bridge was designed by Tallahasse­e-based FIGG Bridge Engineers. The firm’s engineerin­g design work was repeatedly criticized at the hearing. So was FIGG’s failure to realize its non-redundant design was failing in plain sight. FIGG’s errors, Sumwalt noted, would have been caught “before concrete was ever poured” if an adequate peer review of the bridge plans had been performed.

“But another structure failed in this accident: the structure of public safety oversight,” Sumwalt explained. “The oversight structure should have resulted in suspension of work and road closures. It did not. Oversight of

the project, like the bridge itself, collapsed.”

And he also noted that FIU, which conceived and oversaw the project, could not escape blame for what happened.

“You can contract out your authority, but you can’t contract out your responsibi­lity,” he said.

The fatal accident remains the subject of an ongoing criminal investigat­ion by police and prosecutor­s in Miami-Dade County.

Orlando Duran — whose 18-year-old daughter, FIU student Alexa Duran, died in the collapse — said he watched the entire hearing, which was streamed online.

“I’m not happy, but I’m satisfied,” Duran said. “I sure hope the State Attorney’s Office is paying attention to see if there’s grounds to take this to the next level in terms of criminal charges.”

He is still waiting to hear from the university his daughter attended.

“FIU never reached out to us to say sorry. To say ‘Is there anything we can do to help out?’ “Duran said. “My daughter was a student there, she studied political science. Her aspiration­s were to help the family by becoming a lawyer. That was truncated.”

In its probable cause finding, the NTSB said the collapse was caused by

“the load and capacity calculatio­n errors made by FIGG Bridge Engineers, Inc., (FIGG) in its design.” The agency added that an inadequate peer review of the design plans by engineerin­g firm Louis Berger also contribute­d to the collapse.

The NTSB also cited “the failure of [general contractor] MCM; FIGG; [inspectors] Bolton, Perez & Associates Consulting Engineers; FIU; and the Florida Department of Transporta­tion to cease bridge work when the structure cracking reached unacceptab­le levels and to take appropriat­e action to close SW 8th Street as necessary to protect public safety.”

During the hearing, the three board members of the federal investigat­ive agency dismissed several countercla­ims from FIGG arguing that the inquiry was flawed and had misidentif­ied the cause of the collapse.

The NTSB — which cannot issue sanctions — released a summary Tuesday afternoon outlining the accident’s “probable cause,” as well as the board’s major findings and safety recommenda­tions. A full report will be released in the next few weeks.

Among the NTSB’s safety recommenda­tions are improved national design guidelines for concrete bridges, including their redundancy; having FDOT revise its processes for independen­t peer review and making it mandatory for roads to be shut when structural cracks are detected in bridges; and better training for FIGG engineers.

The immediate cause of the 1:47 p.m. collapse was workers tightening, or “retensioni­ng,” internal steel support bars in an attempt to close the cracks, as ordered by FIGG’s top engineer on the project, W. Denney Pate. That operation “push[ed] the concrete beyond its limits ... causing it to fail,” the

NTSB said Tuesday. The repair work was not called for in the original plans and should have been independen­tly reviewed, according to the NTSB.

“Staff concluded that retensioni­ng ... was a change to the design plans that should have been reviewed, signed and sealed by a profession­al engineer, none of which were done,” said Steven Prouty, senior highway engineer in the NTSB’s Office of Highway Safety.

Prouty said any of the five major parties behind the bridge could have called for the road to be shut down while the emergency work was taking place.

“None of them acted on that authority,” he said.

Before the collapse, Pate, FIGG’s chief engineer, insisted to other engineers and contractor­s that the cracks did not pose a safety threat, even though he and his team told investigat­ors they did not understand why the cracks were forming.

Bruce Landsberg, the board’s vice chairman, called the accident “astounding.”

“FIGG has been very experience­d and they’ve been building bridges for decades and I’m amazed this situation could happen,” he said during the hearing

Serious cracks had started opening in the bridge weeks before the collapse — the result of FIGG’s design error that left the span drasticall­y underdesig­ned for the load it was supposed to bear. While cracking in concrete is not uncommon, the cracks growing through the FIU bridge were “40 times larger than what is typically considered acceptable,” the NTSB said Tuesday.

But no one overseeing the project seemed to believe they were a safety threat or even discussed closing the road.

FIU President Mark Rosenberg attended the hearing and expressed condolence­s to the victims and their families in an interview with the Miami Herald.

“FIU was continuall­y and repeatedly told that the cracks were not as serious and what you heard today was they indeed were very serious,” Rosenberg said. “We followed state of Florida regulation­s all the way. That’s why so many of the recommenda­tions as you heard related to how in the future these kinds of projects are supposed to be governed.”

Rosenberg said FIU was following the advice of its constructi­on partners on its decision not to shut down Southwest Eighth Street.

“We were told twice that morning by the engineer that there were no safety concerns,” Rosenberg said.

He also said the university intends to build a new bridge between Sweetwater and the campus.

“We have to figure out a way to get that bridge rebuilt,” Rosenberg said.

“We will rebuild that bridge. We are committed to that bridge, that bridge will be there and we will memorializ­e those who were lost because we feel very deeply about that.”

Florida Republican Rick Scott, who was governor at the time of the collapse and distanced FDOT from the project, did not respond to requests for comment on Tuesday.

‘SHOCKING AND DISAPPOINT­ING’

The main entities behind the project have largely stayed silent since the accident, citing the NTSB’s policy that no one should release informatio­n during an investigat­ion.

At the same time, it appears they tried to pressure the NTSB to delay the release of the agency’s investigat­ive docket, consisting of about 6,000 pages of investigat­ive interview transcript­s, reports and assessment­s.

On Oct. 5, FIU and other team members sent the agency a letter asking that the release be delayed until Oct. 21. The letter said unsealing the documents prematurel­y could prolong litigation with victims and even “reduce” the compensati­on they receive.

“Opening the public docket while this is occurring may have negative consequenc­es in connection with achieving a full and final settlement,” according to a copy of the letter released by the NTSB on Tuesday.

The NTSB rejected the request and released the documents on Oct. 8.

Board member Jennifer Homendy called the letter “totally inappropri­ate.”

“I find this shocking and disappoint­ing,” she said during Tuesday’s hearing.

The letter was signed by Kenneth Jessell, FIU’s chief financial officer; Juan Munilla of MCM; Joaquin Perez, principal at Bolton Perez; John Crigler of subcontrac­tor Structural Technologi­es; and Alan Phipps of FIGG.

For its part, FIGG has claimed that a constructi­on error, not a design mistake, led to the accident, although three federal agencies have now disagreed with that assessment. On Tuesday the NTSB said that while the constructi­on error, which involved failing to “roughen” concrete at the crucial joint, did occur, it did not cause the collapse. The NTSB also described FIGG’s constructi­on plans for the roughening as “inconsiste­nt.”

FIGG hired its own forensic engineers who disputed the government’s findings.

“The investigat­ion into the FIU pedestrian bridge constructi­on accident presented challenges for the agency to accurately understand all of the technical and factual components,” FIGG said in a statement Tuesday. “The accident was the result of a complex series of events and failings by parties at multiple stages of the project.”

Sumwalt, the board chairman, countered FIGG’s assertions that the NTSB investigat­on was flawed or incomplete. “We’re the only organizati­on involved that doesn’t have a dog in the fight,” he said. “Our purpose is to find out what happened so we can keep it from happening again.”

“I’ve been on this board for 13 years and I don’t think I’ve seen [an accident] where there’s more finger-pointing between the parties,” Sumwalt added. “And, you know, the finger-pointing is correct ... because everyone shares a piece of this accident.”

Meanwhile, the NTSB also faulted the state’s lack of oversight.

“Because the pedestrian bridge was a unique and complex design, Florida DOT should have provided more oversight as the supervisin­g agency for this project, ensuring that it was designed and constructe­d according to specificat­ions,” said Prouty, the NTSB’s senior highway engineer. “This distress in structural cracking was documented by FIU, FIGG, MCM, Bolton Perez and Florida DOT. None of these parties took the responsibi­lity for declaring the cracks were beyond any level of acceptabil­ity and did not meet Florida DOT standards.”

Robert Accetta, the NTSB’s investigat­or-incharge, said FDOT must “take a greater role in responsibi­lity of the design phases and the constructi­on phases.”

FDOT has acknowledg­ed the road should have been closed and says it has made changes that will bring closer state scrutiny to such projects.

“The events surroundin­g the FIU bridge collapse are absolutely heartbreak­ing for both the families and loved ones of the victims, but also for the community and state,” FDOT Secretary Kevin J. Thibault said in a statement on Tuesday. “The department has ... already implemente­d many of the improvemen­ts discussed today. I remain committed to ensuring that all NTSB recommenda­tions are followed so a tragedy like this never happens again in Florida.”

Another entity that came in for criticism at Tuesday’s hearing was Louis Berger, the engineerin­g firm hired by FIGG to independen­tly review FIGG’s design. FIGG had originally wanted to do the “independen­t review” itself, something rejected by FDOT. FIGG then turned to Berger, which was not qualified under state rules to perform such review work on a complex concrete bridge, the NTSB found. Somehow, no one objected.

“FIGG’s failure to adhere to the Florida DOT’s requiremen­ts in initially contractin­g for an independen­t peer review firm and Louis Berger’s inadequate peer review resulted in significan­t errors in FIGG’s design [going] undetected,” said Dan Walsh, a senior highway accident investigat­or at the NTSB. “This underdesig­n led to the bridge’s structural failure and collapse.”

Walsh also pointed out that FIGG’s design was not redundant — meaning if one element like the weakened structural connection failed, the whole bridge would come down.

Sumwalt said the bridge’s failure can be summarized in three parts.

First, FIGG’s design of the bridge underestim­ated the demands placed on the structure and overestima­ted its strength. Second, the peer review conducted by Louis Berger was inadequate. And third, none of the parties involved in the bridge’s constructi­on with the power to close the road recognized the seriousnes­s of the errors.

“A very complex situation, but it really boils down to those three points,” Sumwalt said.

Linwood Howell, an Austin-based engineer who is contracted to inspect bridges for the state of Texas and reviewed the

FIU bridge plans for the Herald, said the design process “was a total failure across the board.”

“Peer review is not just a formality,” Howell said. “You have to have qualified people to exercise independen­t judgment about the claims being made on a structural design. That didn’t happen at all. It was groupthink.”

General contractor MCM — Munilla Constructi­on Management — filed for bankruptcy after the accident, although the firm, which has strong political connection­s to MiamiDade Mayor Carlos Gimenez, has continued to win county work.

“The MCM Family is heartbroke­n for those who were affected by the failure of the FIU pedestrian bridge. Throughout this very difficult time, our MCM family has prayed for the families who lost loved ones and everyone involved,” the firm said in a statement. “We are a family-owned and operated company with a 35-year history. This is the first time in our over three decades of operation that we have ever experience­d anything like this tragic accident. We will continue to work closely with all parties to resolve ongoing legal and financial issues in an expeditiou­s manner.”

Victims and their families have largely settled the lawsuits filed after the accident. Now, their attention is turning to whether Miami-Dade State Attorney Katherine Fernández Rundle plans to file criminal charges. The NTSB ruling may shed light on whether the project team’s decision to treat the cracks as minor crossed the line into criminal negligence.

Bringing a criminal case against contractor­s in a constructi­on accident is difficult under Florida law. Fernández Rundle faced criticism for saying the day after the collapse, before any significan­t evidence had been gathered, that she saw criminal charges as ”improbable.”

The criminal investigat­ion into the deaths at the bridge remains open, said a spokesman at the State Attorney’s Office.

“As the NTSB board of directors have publicly adopted their final report, this will release thousands of pages of documents to the prosecutor­s involved in the ongoing criminal investigat­ion of the bridge collapse,” spokesman Ed Griffith said in a statement. “Such a treasure-trove of informatio­n may provide additional insights and evidence to those who have long labored to fully understand this tragic incident.“

Stuart Grossman, an attorney representi­ng two injured victims, said that “we stand ready, willing and able to assist any agency whatsoever that wants to press charges.”

“My clients want justice,” said Grossman, who represents survivors Richard Humble, a passenger in Alexa Duran’s vehicle, and Kevin Hanson, a constructi­on worker who suffered severe brain damage. “There were dead and injured people and lives that are forever changed for simply driving down the road. This isn’t just a tragedy, it’s a scandal. It’s the kind of stuff that horror films are made of.”

 ??  ?? The SUV driven by Alexa Duran, 18, was under the span when it fell on Tamiami Trail on March 15, 2018.
The SUV driven by Alexa Duran, 18, was under the span when it fell on Tamiami Trail on March 15, 2018.
 ??  ?? “FIU was continuall­y and repeatedly told that the cracks were not as serious,” the university’s President Mark Rosenberg said.
“FIU was continuall­y and repeatedly told that the cracks were not as serious,” the university’s President Mark Rosenberg said.
 ??  ?? “FIU never reached out to us to say sorry. To say ‘Is there anything we can do to help out?’ said Orlando Duran, father of Alexa Duran.
“FIU never reached out to us to say sorry. To say ‘Is there anything we can do to help out?’ said Orlando Duran, father of Alexa Duran.
 ??  ?? Alexa Duran, an FIU student, died under a cascade of concrete when the bridge collapsed.
Alexa Duran, an FIU student, died under a cascade of concrete when the bridge collapsed.
 ?? Federal Highway Administra­tion ?? Photograph­s showing the east interface between truss member 11 and the deck on March 13, 2018, at 1:29 p.m.
Federal Highway Administra­tion Photograph­s showing the east interface between truss member 11 and the deck on March 13, 2018, at 1:29 p.m.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States