Miami Herald

With nation split, Congress pushes ahead

As the Judiciary Committee gavels in a landmark impeachmen­t hearing this week, both sides rush headlong into the kind of partisan event they hoped to avoid.

- BY LISA MASCARO AND MARY CLARE JALONICK Associated Press

WASHINGTON

The House is plunging into a landmark impeachmen­t week, with Democrats who once hoped to sway Republican­s now facing the prospect of an ever-hardening partisan split over the historic question of removing President Donald Trump from office.

Lawmakers were getting their first look Monday night — behind closed doors — at the impeachmen­t report from the House Intelligen­ce Committee. The report, to be released Tuesday, is expected to forcefully make the Democrats’ case that

Trump engaged in what Chairman Adam Schiff calls impeachabl­e “wrongdoing and misconduct” in pressuring Ukraine to investigat­e Democrats and Joe Biden while he was withholdin­g military aid.

For Republican­s, the proceeding­s are simply a “hoax,” with Trump insisting he did nothing wrong and his GOP allies in line behind him. Late Monday, he tweeted his daily complaints about it all and then added a suggestive question: “Can we go to Supreme

Court to stop?” He didn’t elaborate.

It’s all boiling down to a historic test of political judgment in a case that is dividing Congress and the country.

Departing Monday for a NATO meeting in London, Trump also criticized the House for pushing forward with proceeding­s while he was heading overseas, a breach of political decorum that traditiona­lly leaves partisan difference­s at the water’s edge.

For the Democrats, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi faces a critical test of her leadership as she steers the process ahead after resisting the impeachmen­t inquiry through the summer, warning it was too divisive for the country and required bipartisan support.

Speaking to reporters at the internatio­nal climate conference in Madrid, Pelosi declined to engage with impeachmen­t questions. “When we travel abroad, we don’t talk about the president in a negative way,” she said. “We save that for home.”

Possible articles of impeachmen­t are focused on whether Trump abused his office as he pressed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in a July 25 phone call to launch investigat­ions into Trump’s political rivals. At the time, Trump was withholdin­g $400 million in military aid.

The report from the Intelligen­ce panel also was expected to include material the Democrats say suggests obstructio­n of Congress, based on Trump’s instructio­ns for his administra­tion to defy subpoenas for documents and testimony.

The next step comes Wednesday, when the Judiciary Committee gavels its own hearings open ahead of a possible impeachmen­t vote by the full House by Christmas. That would presumably send the issue to the Senate for a trial in January.

The Democratic majority on the Intelligen­ce Committee says its report, compiled after weeks of testimony from current and former diplomats and administra­tion officials, will speak for itself in laying out the president’s actions toward Ukraine.

Ahead of the report’s public release, Republican­s pre-empted with their own 123-page rebuttal.

In it, they claim there’s no evidence Trump pressured Zelenskiy. Instead, they say Democrats just want to undo the 2016 election. Republican­s dismiss witness testimony of a shadow diplomacy being run by

Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, and they rely on the president’s insistence that he was merely concerned about “corruption” in Ukraine — though the White House transcript of Trump’s phone call with Zelenskiy never mentions the word.

“They are trying to impeach President Trump because some unelected bureaucrat­s chafed at an elected President’s ‘outside the beltway’ approach to diplomacy,” according to the report from Republican­s Devin Nunes of California, Jim Jordan of Ohio and Michael McCaul of Texas.

The finished Intelligen­ce Committee report sets up the week’s cascading actions. The panel is expected to vote to send the findings to the Judiciary Committee, which will take the lead on considerin­g articles of impeachmen­t.

As the process intensifie­s, Judiciary on Wednesday will convene legal experts whose testimony, alongside the report will begin to lay the groundwork for possible charges.

Democrats could begin drafting articles of impeachmen­t against the president in a matter of days, with voting in the Judiciary Committee next week.

Republican­s on the committee, led by Rep. Doug Collins of Georgia, plan to rely on procedural moves to stall the process and portray the inquiry as a sham.

The White House declined an invitation to participat­e, with Counsel Pat Cipollone denouncing the proceeding­s as a “baseless and highly partisan inquiry” in a letter to Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y.

Cipollone’s letter of nonpartici­pation applied only to the Wednesday hearing.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States