Miami Herald

Study finds airline passengers are unlikely to spread COVID-19 if they wear masks

- BY TARA COPP tcopp@mcclatchyd­c.com

WASHINGTON

During a long flight, if a passenger behind you coughs, how much risk do you face of catching the coronaviru­s that causes COVID-19?

A new study by the U.S. Transporta­tion Command found that the exposure risk might be small — especially if everyone wears masks.

Researcher­s from Transporta­tion Command and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) conducted

300 tests with mannequins and sensors aboard United Airlines 767 and 777 wide-body jets.

“No one has generated this level of understand­ing of aero

The Pentagon studied possible virus transmissi­on on aircraft to determine the safest seat configurat­ions for its global transport flights of troops and their families.

sol movement in aircraft,” said DARPA scientist Eric Van Gieson. “Now there is a dataset out there that the commercial and private industry can utilize.”

The Pentagon sought the study to determine what the safest seat configurat­ions were for its global transport flights of troops and their families.

In the tests, aerosols with fluorescen­t tracers were released to map the circulatio­n of air particles during breathing. In some tests, a mannequin, representi­ng an infected passenger, would release a “cough” of aerosol particles that were detected by the sensors. In some of the tests the mannequin wore a mask, in others, it didn’t.

The greatest exposure occurred for passengers seated in the same row, and in the rows immediatel­y behind and in front of the mannequin.

But even with those passengers, the sensors detected that the saturation of particles had dropped off by as much as 99% by the time they traveled to those seats. That finding led TRANSCOM’s researcher­s to conclude that passengers would have to be in the aircraft for more than two days with an infected person to absorb a high enough level of COVID-19 particles to become ill.

The mannequin was moved around to different seats in the aircraft to see where the particles would spread.

The tests, which were conducted in August, did not look at “large droplet” transmissi­on, for example, if a person spoke without a mask on, moved around the cabin without a mask, or took the mask off to eat.

The researcher­s found that when the mannequin wore a mask, 95% of the particles were blocked.

When there was no mask, however, the spread of the aerosol particles still only traveled to a smaller area of people than expected.

“The analysis showed an overall low exposure risk on aircraft from airborne pathogens like COVID-19,” said Vice Adm. Dee Mewbourne, deputy commander of Transporta­tion Command.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported in September that 1,600 passengers it had studied who had flown while infected with COVID-19 might have exposed as many as 11,000 passengers to the virus, but the CDC also said it was not able to verify that those additional passengers had become exposed because of the flight.

The Transporta­tion Command study found that, depending on where the “infected” mannequin was located, there were very slight difference­s in exposure levels recorded between a passenger who sat on the aisle, versus a middle seat or window.

Overall, the different levels of exposure were so miniscule for aisle or window seats that “there is no practical difference at these high overall reduction levels.”

One of the key factors in reducing the travel of the particles was use of the plane’s air-filtration system. “Keeping air supply and recirculat­ion mode (HEPA-Filtration) operating is critical,” the study said, recommendi­ng that all aircraft have the filtration system on during boarding.

The study also recommende­d that based on its findings, wider contact tracing of the entire passenger manifest might not be necessary just because an infected passenger flew on an airline.

However, it found that contact tracing might be necessary “for large droplet transmissi­on in the seats immediatel­y neighborin­g an infectious passenger, or from uncertaint­y in human behavior, such as talking to a neighborin­g passenger while eating or drinking without a mask.”

 ?? STEPHENIE WADE U.S. Transporta­tion Command ?? Vice Adm. Dee Mewbourne, right, deputy commander of U.S. Transporta­tion Command, receives a descriptio­n of the airflow-particle test from David Silcott, chief executive of S3i, a research company, on board a United Airlines 767 in August.
STEPHENIE WADE U.S. Transporta­tion Command Vice Adm. Dee Mewbourne, right, deputy commander of U.S. Transporta­tion Command, receives a descriptio­n of the airflow-particle test from David Silcott, chief executive of S3i, a research company, on board a United Airlines 767 in August.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States