Miami Herald

Supreme Court revives abortion-pill restrictio­n

- BY ADAM LIPTAK

In the Supreme Court’s first ruling on abortion since the arrival of Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the court Tuesday reinstated a federal requiremen­t that women seeking to end their pregnancie­s using medication­s pick up a pill in person from a hospital or medical office.

The court’s brief order was unsigned, and the three more liberal justices dissented. The only member of the majority to offer an explanatio­n was Chief Justice John Roberts, who said the ruling was a limited one that deferred to the views of experts.

The question, he wrote, was not whether the requiremen­t imposed “an undue burden on a woman’s right to an abortion as a general matter.” Instead, he wrote, it was whether a federal judge should have second-guessed the Food and Drug Administra­tion’s determinat­ion “because of the court’s own evaluation of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.”

In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Elena Kagan, said the majority was grievously wrong.

“This country’s laws have long singled out abortions for more onerous treatment than other medical procedures that carry similar or greater risks,” Sotomayor wrote.

Judge Theodore D. Chuang, of the U.S. District Court in Maryland, had blocked the requiremen­t in light of the coronaviru­s pandemic, saying a needless trip to a medical facility during a health crisis very likely imposed an undue burden on the constituti­onal right to abortion.

The case concerned a restrictio­n on medication abortions, which are permitted in the first 10 weeks of pregnancy. About 60% of abortions performed in those weeks use two drugs rather than surgery.

The first drug, mifepristo­ne, blocks the effects of progestero­ne, a hormone without which the lining of the uterus begins to break down. A second drug, misoprosto­l, taken 24 to 48 hours later, induces contractio­ns of the uterus that expel its contents.

The contested measure requires women to appear in person to pick up the mifepristo­ne and to sign a form, even when they had already consulted with their doctors remotely. There is no requiremen­t that women pick up misoprosto­l in person, and it is available at retail and mail-order pharmacies.

The American College of Obstetrici­ans and Gynecologi­sts and other groups, all represente­d by the American Civil Liberties Union, sued to suspend the requiremen­t that women make a trip to obtain the first drug in light of the pandemic.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States