Miami Herald

Report: Immigratio­n officials created network that can spy on majority of Americans

- BY CINDY CARCAMO

Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t has crafted a sophistica­ted surveillan­ce dragnet designed to spy on most people living in the United States, without the need for warrants and many times circumvent­ing state privacy laws, such as those in California, according to a two-year investigat­ion released Tuesday by the Georgetown Law Center on Privacy & Technology.

Over the years, privacy law experts and civil rights activists and attorneys have accused ICE of overreach in its surveillan­ce tactics directed at immigrants and Americans alike, but the Georgetown report paints a picture of an agency that has gone well beyond its immigratio­n enforcemen­t mandate, instead evolving into something of a broader domestic surveillan­ce agency, according to the report, called “American Dragnet: Data-Driven Deportatio­n in the 21st Century.”

ICE officials did not respond to a Los Angeles

Times request for comment.

The report outlines the extent into which ICE has gone in order to form a large-scale surveillan­ce system that has reached into the lives into ordinary people living in the U.S. Skirting local laws intending to protect individual­s’ privacy, the agency has turned to third-party outfits — utility companies, private databases and even the Department of Motor Vehicles in some states — to amass a trove of informatio­n from hundreds of thousands of Americans and immigrants to target people for deportatio­n.

ICE spent an estimated $2.8 billion between 2008 and 2021 on new surveillan­ce, data collection and data-sharing initiative­s, according to the Georgetown report.

The large scale of ICE surveillan­ce came as a shock even to the report’s authors.

“I was alarmed to discover that ICE has built up a sweeping surveillan­ce infrastruc­ture capable of tracking almost anyone, seemingly at any time. ICE has ramped up its surveillan­ce capacities in nearcomple­te secrecy and impunity, sidesteppi­ng limitation­s and flying under the radar of lawmakers,” said Nina Wang, policy associate at the Center on Privacy & Technology and a co-author of the study.

“Even in states that have tried to protect immigrants’ data, ICE has found ways to sidestep some of the strongest restrictio­ns on the kinds of records that it can access, as well as regulation­s on when and how and on whom it can pull this informatio­n,” she said.

“As a result, anyone’s informatio­n can end up in the hands of immigratio­n enforcemen­t simply because they’ve applied for driver’s licenses; driven on the roads; or signed up with their local utilities to get access to heat, water and electricit­y.”

For years, civil liberty and immigrant rights groups, such as the American Civil Liberties Union, have exposed and pushed back against ICE’s massive surveillan­ce powers, launching lawsuits against the agency, with some success.

Researcher­s compiled the report from the results of hundreds of Freedom of Informatio­n Act requests.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States