Miami Herald

Justices limit federal court review of some deportatio­ns

- BY MARK SHERMAN

A sharply divided Supreme Court on Monday ruled that federal courts are powerless to review immigratio­n officials’ decisions in some deportatio­n cases, even when they have made what a dissenting justice called “egregious factual mistakes.”

The court ruled 5-4 against Georgia resident Pankajkuma­r Patel, who checked a box indicating he was a U.S. citizen when renewing his Georgia driver’s license in 2008.

An immigratio­n judge, who is a Justice Department employee, concluded Patel intended to misreprese­nt his status for the purpose of getting his license, even though Georgia law entitled a noncitizen in Patel’s situation to a license to drive.

Patel and his wife, Jyotsnaben, concede they entered the U.S. illegally roughly 30 years ago since leaving their native India. In 2007, Patel applied for a “green card,” legal permanent residency status, with the support of his employer. The Patels have three children. One is a U.S. citizen and the other two are green-card holders who are married to Americans.

But Patel’s quest for legal status foundered on the license applicatio­n, and the immigratio­n judge’s decision that Patel had intentiona­lly misreprese­nted his citizenshi­p status. The judge ordered Patel and his wife deported.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett

wrote for five conservati­ve justices that federal courts can’t review such decisions under immigratio­n law. The U.S. attorney general can grant protection from deportatio­n, but people must first be eligible and the result of the immigratio­n judge’s decision was that Patel was ineligible.

“Federal courts have a very limited role to play in this process,” Barrett wrote concluding that immigratio­n law “precludes judicial review of factual findings that underlie a denial of relief.”

Justice Neil Gorsuch joined with the court’s three liberal justices in dissent. “As a result, no court may correct even the agency’s most egregious factual mistakes about an individual’s statutory eligibilit­y for relief,” Gorsuch wrote, noting the agency itself sided with Patel at the Supreme Court.

While the high-court case dealt with deportatio­n, Gorsuch wrote that the decision could foreclose court review when immigratio­n officials make errors of fact in other contexts, “the student hoping to remain in the country, the foreigner who marries a U. S. citizen, the skilled worker sponsored by her employer.”

Pointing to government statistics, Gorsuch wrote that the U.S. Citizenshi­p and Immigratio­n Services rejected 13,000 green-card applicatio­ns in the last three months of 2021 and has a backlog of nearly 790,000 pending cases.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States