Miami Herald

Miami to put ‘tiny homes’ for homeless on an island after commission­ers change course

- BY JOEY FLECHAS, ALEXANDER LUGO AND LINDA ROBERTSON jflechas@miamiheral­d.com alugo@miamiheral­d.com lrobertson@miamiheral­d.com Joey Flechas: 305-376-3602, @joeflech Alexander Lugo: @Alexlugo67

One hour after Miami commission­ers rejected a concept to create a temporary homeless shelter on Virginia Key, one commission­er flipped his vote, allowing the city to pursue a plan to set up

“tiny homes” for 50 to 100 people on the island.

The idea for a “transition zone” was first suggested by Commission­er Joe Carollo in 2021 and was pitched Thursday as a way to connect people who are homeless with social services. But it sparked an outcry among outdoor enthusiast­s and cyclists who bike, hike and paddle in the area, and was criticized by the Miami-Dade County Homeless Trust.

Initially, Carollo and Chairwoman Christine

King were the only two votes in favor of a pilot program to build several dozen small rooms on the northeast end of Virginia Key. When Carollo moved to launch the program, the vote failed Thursday evening. Then less than two hours later, Commission­er Alex Díaz de la Portilla asked to reconsider the idea.

Díaz de la Portilla then endorsed the pilot program and asked City Manager

Art Noriega’s staff to analyze options for other locations in Miami and outside city limits. The administra­tion is expected to produce a report in late September.

The reversal quickly revived a controvers­ial plan that appeared to be stalled for at least a few months. Díaz de la Portilla joined Carollo and King to pass the pilot program. Commission­ers Manolo Reyes and Ken Russell voted against.

Now, the city is planning to buy small dwellings and place them on Virginia Key, near several outdoor recreation­al areas.

Earlier in the day, King said she saw the idea as an opportunit­y to provide more support for the city’s homeless population. Carollo was defiant in the face of the opposition to the Virginia Key plan. After mocking critics with references to Alcatraz and Devil’s Island, he argued his case for why he thought the approach was reasonable.

“We see it clearly. No one wants this in their neighborho­od, it’s always somebody else’s they want to dump it in,” Carollo said. “I think we could move on in looking at one particular site that does not affect any of the population areas. Then we could see, if it works in one site, if we want to expand it.”

Russell, who represents Virginia Key, rejected building the shelter in his district, and he said he thought it was a bad idea overall.

“It’s not in compliance with the Virginia Key master plan; we’ve got a lot of hopes for that area with regards to recreation­al and conservati­on activities,” Russell said. “It’s not that I don’t think it should be in one location more than the other, I simply don’t think we should be doing it.”

William Porro, the city’s director of human services, presented the concept as a humane way to help “chronicall­y homeless” people, or people who live on the street and refuse to go to a shelter. He described a facility where an outside management firm would provide security and enforce a zero tolerance policy on drug use, alcohol and violence. The “transition zone” would be a voluntary program.

“I know I’m probably alone on these types of things, but I’m OK with that,” he told commission­ers. “The way that they’re living currently is just deplorable. And they do it day in and day out. I don’t know how they do it.”

Díaz de la Portilla grilled Porro for presenting a list of possible locations that included Virginia Key, a lot under Interstate 95 in Liberty City and other addresses without studying upcoming adjacent real estate projects or, in one case, not speaking with private property owners. Porro also said he had not consulted with entities like the Virginia Key Advisory Board before making his presentati­on Thursday.

Before he changed his vote, Díaz de la Portilla said he’d be open to exploring an idea that didn’t come to his desk last minute.

Community advocates who blasted the Virginia Key idea criticized the city’s approach.

“The city could have avoided the embarrassm­ent of floating this absurd idea,” said Leah Kinnaird, a founder of the Virginia Key Alliance advocacy group and a former nurse at the Camillus House clinic.

Esther Alonso, owner and operator of the Virginia Key Outdoor Center, said the opposition against the project is not about not-inmy-backyard elitists.

“This is about land like no other natural area in Miami,” she said. “Nobody wants a homeless encampment in their backyard, so we’ll put it in everybody’s backyard, in a gem of a public park. It would not be a good co-existence situation. You can’t have a bunch of homeless men around teenage girls in bikinis.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States