Miami Herald

Wounded Knee massacre artifacts highlight slow pace of repatriati­ons

- BY PHILIP MARCELO

One by one, items purportedl­y taken from Native Americans massacred at Wounded Knee Creek emerged from the dark, cluttered display cases where they’ve sat for more than a century in a museum in rural Massachuse­tts.

Moccasins, necklaces, clothing, ceremonial pipes, tools and other objects were carefully laid out on white background­s as a photograph­er dutifully snapped pictures under bright studio lights.

It was a key step in returning scores of items displayed at the Founders Museum in Barre to tribes in South Dakota that have sought them since the 1990s.

“This is real personal,” said Leola One Feather, of the Oglala Sioux Tribe, as she observed the process as part of a two-person tribal delegation last week. “It may be sad for them to lose these items, but it’s even sadder for us because we’ve been looking for them for so long.”

Recent efforts to repatriate human remains and other culturally significan­t items such as those at the Founders Museum represent significan­t and solemn moments for tribes. But they also underscore the slow pace and the monumental task at hand.

Some 870,000 Native American artifacts — including nearly 110,000 human remains — that should be returned to tribes under federal law are still in the possession of colleges, museums and other institutio­ns across the country, according to an Associated Press review of data maintained by the National Park Service.

The University of California, Berkeley tops the list, followed closely by the Ohio History Connection, the state’s historical society. State museums and universiti­es in Pennsylvan­ia, Tennessee, Alabama, Illinois and Kansas as well as Harvard University round out the other top institutio­ns.

And that’s not even counting items held by private institutio­ns such as the Founders Museum, which maintains it does not receive federal funds and therefore doesn’t fall under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriati­on Act, or NAGPRA, the 1990 law governing the return of tribal objects by institutio­ns receiving federal money.

“They’ve had more than three decades,” says Shannon O’Loughlin, chief executive of the Associatio­n on American Indian Affairs, a national group that assists tribes with repatriati­ons. “The time for talk is over. Enough reports and studying. It’s time to repatriate.”

Museum officials say they’ve stepped up efforts with added funding and staff, but continue to struggle with identifyin­g artifacts collected during archaeolog­y’s early years. They also say federal regulation­s governing repatriati­ons remain time-consuming and cumbersome.

Dan Mogulof, an assistant vice chancellor at UC Berkeley, says the university is committed to repatriati­ng the entire 123,000 artifacts in question “in the coming years at a pace that works for tribes.”

In January, the university repatriate­d the remains of at least 20 victims of the

Indian Island Massacre of 1860 to the Wiyot Tribe in Humboldt County, California. But its Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropolo­gy still holds more than 9,000 sets of ancestral remains, mainly from Bayarea tribes.

“We acknowledg­e the great harm and pain we have caused Native American people,” Mogulof said. “Our work will not be complete until all of the ancestors are home.”

At the Ohio History Connection, officials are working to create an intertriba­l burial ground to help bury ancestral remains for tribes forced to move from Ohio as the nation expanded, says Alex Wesaw, the organizati­on’s director of American Indian relations.

The institutio­n took similar steps in 2016 when it establishe­d a cemetery in northeast Ohio for the Delaware tribes of Oklahoma to re-bury nearly 90 ancestors who had been stored for centuries in museums in Pennsylvan­ia.

Complicati­ng matters, some of its more than

7,000 ancestral remains and 110,000 objects are thousands of years old, making it difficult to determine which modern-day tribe or tribes they should be returned to, Wesaw said.

At the Founders Museum, some 70 miles west of Boston, among the challenges has been determinin­g what’s truly from the Wounded Knee Massacre, says Ann Meilus, the museum’s board president.

Some tribe members maintain as many as 200 items are from massacre victims, but Meilus said museum officials believe its less than a dozen, based on discussion­s with a tribe member more than a decade ago.

The collection was donated by Barre native

Frank Root, a 19th century traveling showman who claimed he’d acquired the objects from a man tasked with digging mass graves following the massacre.

Among the macabre collection was a lock of hair reportedly cut from the scalp of Chief Spotted Elk, which the museum returned to one of the Lakota Sioux leader’s descendant­s in 1999. It also includes a “ghost shirt,” a sacred garment that some tribe members tragically believed could make them bulletproo­f.

“He sort of exaggerate­d things,” Meilus said of Root. “In reality, we’re not sure if any of the items were from Wounded Knee.”

More than 200 men, women, children and elderly people were killed on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservatio­n in 1890 in one of the country’s worst massacres of Native Americans. The killings marked a seminal moment in the frontier battles the U.S. Army waged against tribes.

The U.S. Department of Interior recently proposed changes to the federal repatriati­on process that lay out more precise deadlines, clearer definition­s and heftier penalties for noncomplia­nce.

Tribe leaders say those steps are long overdue, but don’t address other fundamenta­l problems, such as inadequate federal funding for tribes to do repatriati­on work.

Many tribes also still object to requiremen­ts that they explain the cultural significan­ce of an item sought for repatriati­on, including how they’re used in tribal ceremonies, says Brian Vallo, a former governor of the Pueblo of Acoma in New Mexico who was involved in the 2020 repatriati­on of 20 ancestors from the National Museum of Finland and their reburial at Mesa Verde National Park in Colorado.

“That knowledge is only for us,” he said. “It’s not ever shared.”

Stacy Laravie, the historic preservati­on officer for the Ponca Tribe in Nebraska, is optimistic museum leaders are sincere in seeking to rectify the past, in the wake of the national reckoning on racism that’s reverberat­ed through the country in recent years.

Back at the Founders Museum, Jeffrey Not Help Him, an Oglala Sioux member whose family survived the Wounded Knee Massacre, hopes the items could return home this fall, as the museum has suggested.

“We look forward to putting them in a good place,” Not Help Him said. “A place of honor.”

 ?? ??
 ?? PHOTOS BY PHIL MARCELO AP ?? Leola One Feather, above left and at right, of the Oglala Sioux Tribe in South Dakota, watches as John Willis photograph­s Native American artifacts at the Founders Museum in Barre, Massachuse­tts. The private museum is working to repatriate as many as 200 items believed to have been taken from Native Americans massacred by U.S. soldiers at Wounded Knee Creek in 1890.
PHOTOS BY PHIL MARCELO AP Leola One Feather, above left and at right, of the Oglala Sioux Tribe in South Dakota, watches as John Willis photograph­s Native American artifacts at the Founders Museum in Barre, Massachuse­tts. The private museum is working to repatriate as many as 200 items believed to have been taken from Native Americans massacred by U.S. soldiers at Wounded Knee Creek in 1890.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States