Miami Herald

Applaud countries that support human-rights claims against Qatar. And shame those that haven’t

- BY ANDRES OPPENHEIME­R aoppenheim­er@miamiheral­d.com Don’t miss the “Oppenheime­r Presenta” TV show on Sundays at 7 pm E.T. on CNN en Español. Twitter: @oppenheime­ra

The soccer federation­s of United States and several European countries — as well as some multinatio­nal companies — deserve credit: They support a petition by human-rights groups asking organizers of the World Cup in Qatar to pay $440 million in compensati­on to migrant workers who were abused while building the sites for the world’s biggest sports event.

It’s time to name and shame the countries and companies that, so far, haven’t supported that petition or separate demands that Qatar stop persecutin­g its LGBTQ+ community.

As of Nov. 21, a day after the start of the World Cup, not one single Latin American soccer federation participat­ing in the tournament, nor 10 of the 14 multinatio­nal firms that sponsored it, had supported the petition for reparation­s to migrant workers, a spokesman for Human Rights Watch told me.

Human Rights Watch, Amnesty Internatio­nal and several other advocacy groups launched a campaign six months ago, demanding Qatar and the FIFA world soccer federation compensate migrant workers. Hundreds, if not thousands, of foreigners have died in Qatar while working in extreme hot weather; others have been denied the wages promised, human-rights groups say.

By turning a blind eye to human-rights abuses, “FIFA indisputab­ly contribute­d to the widespread abuse of migrant workers involved in World Cuprelated projects in Qatar,” Agnés Callamard, Amnesty Internatio­nal’s secretary general, said in a statement.

Tamara Taraciuk, a senior official with Human Rights Watch, told me that $440 million for reparation­s “is a very small amount, if we compare it to what FIFA expects to win in this World Cup, which is about $6 billion.”

The U.S., Dutch, English, French and Belgian soccer federation­s have supported the humanright­s groups’ petition. But only four multinatio­nal firms — Adidas, CocaCola, McDonald’s and Budweiser — responded positively to Human

Rights Watch’s letters to all World Cup sponsors asking for their support.

Another 10 sponsors — Visa, Hyundai/Kia, Wanda Group, Qatar Energy, Qatar Airways, Vivo, Hisense, Mengniu, Crypto and Byju’s — did not respond to the letter, Taraciuk

told me.

To their credit, the soccer federation­s of England, Wales, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, the Netherland­s and Switzerlan­d joined together to support their team captains’ use rainbow-colored armbands as a show of support for gay rights in Qatar, where homosexual­ity is a crime, punishable with up to three years in jail.

Shamefully, FIFA threatened to penalize players with yellow cards if they wore the armbands, forcing them to abandon the plan. Their teams would have been at a serious disadvanta­ge, since players who receive two yellow cards during a match are ejected.

FIFA President Gianni Infantino has accused human-rights groups of “hypocrisy,” arguing that many European countries have a long history of mistreatin­g migrants, and that they banned homosexual­ity until only a few decades ago.

“What we Europeans have been doing for the past 3,000 years we should be apologizin­g for the next 3,000 years before we start giving moral lessons to people,” Infantino said.

But this argument is a false equivalenc­y. It’s not fair to compare the human-rights situation in Qatar today with one that existed in Europe in the past. By that token, you could potentiall­y justify slavery, or human sacrifice. The fact is that Qatar is an hereditary dictatorsh­ip with no free elections or political parties. There is little freedom of the press. In addition to criminaliz­ing homosexual­ity, Qatar, despite recent labor law reforms, still tolerates abuses against migrant workers.

The 2022 Freedom House report on freedoms around the world classifies Qatar as a “not free” country. The emir “holds all executive and legislativ­e authority, and ultimately controls the judiciary as well,” the report says.

Granted, this is not the first time a World Cup is taking place in an authoritar­ian country. In 1978, the games were held in Argentina during that country’s military dictatorsh­ip; in 2018, they were held in Russia.

But if we normalize FIFA’s decisions to hold World Cup tournament­s in repressive countries and give countries such as Qatar a free pass to whitewash their image by sponsoring these tournament­s — a practice known as “sportswash­ing” — it will be a huge setback for human rights and democracy in the world.

Let’s not allow FIFA to do that again.

 ?? HASSAN AMMAR AP Photo ?? Former Emir of Qatar Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, center, and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan greet each other before the start of the World Cup on Nov. 20.
HASSAN AMMAR AP Photo Former Emir of Qatar Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, center, and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan greet each other before the start of the World Cup on Nov. 20.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States