Miami Herald

Lawmakers should protect Florida business by protecting pharmacy benefits

- BY JULIO FUENTES fshcc.com Julio Fuentes is the president and CEO of the Florida State Hispanic Chamber of Commerce.

The implementa­tion process for The Prescripti­on Drug Reform Act (SB 1550), passed by the Florida Legislatur­e this year, has started. While certain provisions of this law took commendabl­e steps to hold big drug companies accountabl­e for profiteeri­ng practices, other aspects of the law targeting pharmacy benefits pose substantia­l risks for Florida employers — including the Hispanic-owned business community that contribute­s $90 billion annually to the Florida economy.

Overreach in the implementa­tion of the bill, or additional policies that further undermine pharmacy benefits, threaten to restrict the cost-saving options businesses count on to offer better quality and more affordable prescripti­on drug coverage to employees.

While the full consequenc­es of state policies targeting pharmacy benefits remain to be seen for Florida businesses, Congress is considerin­g regulation­s that would go further and have disastrous effects on employers and patients.

Like SB 1550, the federal proposals aimed at pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) would impact the pharmaceut­ical supply chain in unforeseen ways. These policies could limit the methods through which patients can secure their prescripti­ons and the health insurance options business owners are able to offer.

Employers are under no obligation to hire PBMs, but a majority choose to because of the savings and flexibilit­y they offer. For employers, like the 604,000 Hispanic-owned businesses in the Sunshine

State, the number of options at available through a PBM is critical. We should be empowering business owners and making their lives easier, not limiting their options.

The charge to undermine pharmacy benefits is being led by some of the most visible opponents of the pro-growth, pro-business power of the private sector, including U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chairwoman Lina Khan.

The approach they are advocating for would do nothing to lower prescripti­on drug costs, while restrictin­g employers’ ability to offer high-quality, affordable health coverage to their employees and their families. For minorityow­ned businesses, like the ones I work with at the Florida State Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, this would be devastatin­g.

Matrix Global Advisors founder and economist Alex Brill recently published a paper on the critical role PBMs play in the pharmaceut­ical supply chain and explained why employers use them:

“Given the burdens and complexiti­es of managing a pharmacy benefit, most payers opt to hire a PBM, which also allows payers (and by extension their members) to benefit from the leverage in price negotiatio­ns that PBMs gain from representi­ng multiple payers.

“But PBMs do not merely offer leverage. As one expert explained, ‘Creating value requires both scale and expertise . . . PBMs use techniques and programs that have been researched and reported in the peerreview­ed literature as being effective — that is, have demonstrat­ed value,’ including evidence based formulary design, strategies for reaching high-risk members, and retrospect­ive analysis of drug utilizatio­n.”

Brill concluded that antiPBM policies do “nothing to address drug prices and may raise pharmaceut­ical spending overall.”

Instead of eliminatin­g flexibilit­y for Florida employers to design affordable, high-quality prescripti­on drug coverage, policymake­rs at both the federal and state level should focus on addressing the root cause of high prescripti­on drug prices, building on the foundation set in SB 1550 for holding big drug companies accountabl­e.

SB 1550 contains provisions that will require drug manufactur­ers to report price increases above 15 percent in one year or exceeding 30 percent over three years. This is a positive policy that will shine a light on bad actors putting patients at risk through market-distorting price hikes.

What lawmakers shouldn’t advance are policies that restrict employers’ ability to offer coverage — especially when the federal government is teetering on the edge of advancing similar policies that would negatively affect the business community nationwide.

In the coming year, Florida’s elected leaders must prioritize strengthen­ing our business community and protecting growth at a tenuous time for the economy. This includes rejecting any new proposals aimed at employers’ pharmacy benefits.

 ?? Photo from Christina Victoria Craft, UnSplash ?? Federal proposals could limit patients’ ability to secure their prescripti­ons and the health insurance options business owners are able to offer.
Photo from Christina Victoria Craft, UnSplash Federal proposals could limit patients’ ability to secure their prescripti­ons and the health insurance options business owners are able to offer.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States