Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Public financing for other arena projects.

- By TOM KERTSCHER tkertscher@journalsen­tinel.com

News broke Wednesday that an agreement was close on how to pay for a new $500 million arena for the Milwaukee Bucks.

Some details of the proposed arrangemen­t between the Bucks and state and local government officials were new. But the overall cost sharing was, more or less, what had long been expected: The Bucks’ owners would pay half and taxpayers would pay half.

According to Tim Sheehy, president of the Metropolit­an Milwaukee Associatio­n of Commerce, such a split would be good for taxpayers. Here is what he said April 10 on “Here and Now,” a Wisconsin Public Television show:

“If this comes out close to a 5050 partnershi­p, it will be much better — in terms of the portion of the public financing — than most of the other arena projects done around the country.”

In other words, Sheehy is saying that taxpayers picking up half the tab for a new Milwaukee arena is relatively low, compared with how much taxpayers have contribute­d toward arenas for other National Basketball Associatio­n teams.

Let’s take a look.

Other arena deals

To see how other NBA arenas have been financed, we turned to two sources: The 2012 edition of “Financing Economic Developmen­t in the 21st Century,” a textbook that has a chapter on financing profession­al sports facilities. And a database, last updated in August, that is maintained by Marquette University Law School’s National Sports Law Institute.

Based on the two sources we checked, at least eight of the 15 NBA arenas built since 1999 were financed with more than 50% taxpayer support. Indeed, although there is some variations in the figures in the two sources, seven of the eight arenas were built with at least 82% public money (the total cost figures are according to the textbook).

Those arenas were built in Orlando, Fla.; Charlotte, N.C.; Memphis, Tenn.; Houston; San Antonio; Oklahoma City; Miami; and New Orleans. According to the textbook, the public portion ranged between 82% and 100%; according to Marquette, the range was 59% to 100%.

Conversely, the textbook and Marquette agree that only four of the arenas were built with taxpayer contributi­ons of 50% or less.

Those arenas were built in Dallas, Toronto, Denver and Los Angeles. The two sources agreed that the Toronto arena was 100% privately financed. The public portion for the other three arenas ranged from 16% to 50%, according to the textbook. Marquette said the range was 3% to 30%.

There was not agreement between the two sources on the public portion paid for arenas in Brooklyn, Indianapol­is and Atlanta.

Our rating

Sheehy said a 50-50 public-private split for paying for a new Milwaukee Bucks arena would “be much better in terms of the portion of the public financing than most of the other arena projects done around the country.”

Of the 15 NBA arenas — composing half the cities in the league — built since 1999, at least eight were built with more than 50% of the money coming from taxpayers. Seven of those eight were built with at least 82% public money.

We rate his statement True.

 ??  ?? TAXES Tim Sheehy, president of Metropolit­an Milwaukee Associatio­n of Commerce
THE STATEMENT A 50-50 publicpriv­ate split for paying for a new Milwaukee Bucks arena would “be much better — in terms of the portion of the public financing — than most of...
TAXES Tim Sheehy, president of Metropolit­an Milwaukee Associatio­n of Commerce THE STATEMENT A 50-50 publicpriv­ate split for paying for a new Milwaukee Bucks arena would “be much better — in terms of the portion of the public financing — than most of...
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? THE VERDICT Taxpayers have paid well over 50% for most NBA arenas built since 1999.
THE VERDICT Taxpayers have paid well over 50% for most NBA arenas built since 1999.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States