Energy and the Resurrection

I read with interest two articles in the Journal Sentinel Crossroads section on Easter Sunday: the frontpage editorial, “A new spring for energy” and “Remembering the Resurrection” on page 2.

The editorial states, “Here’s hoping for a new spring for renewable energy.” Correctly, it articulates how renewable energy can help mitigate the effects of climate change, which is real and ever more urgent. Yes, the state Public Service Commission needs to find ways to expedite the wind projects described. I add that it also needs to speed up many other renewable energy projects. Indeed, the state’s 10% renewable energy goal is anemic. A higher goal is needed to mitigate climate change.

But the editorial missed two important points: renewable energy and the “new economy” generate more jobs in Wisconsin than the dirty “old economy” based on fossil fuels. It is ludicrous that the governor and Legislature, who profess to want to stimulate jobs, are behind the eight-ball — and behind other states — in recognizing this. Further, all the money paid for fossil fuels goes out of the state, whereas renewable energy jobs can recirculate money within the state as the jobs generate additional economic activity.

Robert J. Hutchinson’s piece on the Resurrection argued, as I read it, that Jesus came alive in the beliefs and practices of the early Christian community. This community-based understanding of the Resurrection makes sense to me as a Christian. Along with Jesus’ teachings, this understanding leads me to say we are called by God to promote community. Renewable energy promotes community by creating local jobs and building more prosperity. We must promote policies that mitigate global warming, not ones that court disasters, such as more severe storms, and tear apart our community. Bruce G. S. Wiggins

Milwaukee